The controversial birth of human-shampshame and the death of the secrets Human knowledge passed through red lines

Recently, strange and unbelievable rumors of a human-shampshesian birth have been released in a laboratory in Florida, USA and its controversial death.

The process of human and chimpanzee evolution was separated about six to seven million years ago, during which time, each lived independently in different conditions and evolved in different forms. However, the idea of ​​creating a human-Shampisse hybrid called Humanzee has historically become a controversial topic.

Humeni has been introduced as a hypothetical creature that has common physical and behavioral characteristics of humans and chimpanzees. The idea of ​​creating such a creature is generally a scientific curiosity, but it also faces challenges from ethical and biological perspectives.

Many rumors about the creation of Humanas have been caused by genetic abilities and scientific research. In the 1980s, allegations that scientists have been able to create a hybrid of humans and chimpanzees fell on languages. These rumors are particularly attributed to a laboratory in Florida, where it is said to have been born with Humeni characteristics. But have this controversial birthday rumors of this human-chickens have a scientific basis?

List of Content

The first human attempt to give birth

The concept of the creation of a human-shampschose hybrid, often known as “Humansey” or “Chuman”, has always been a controversial and fascinating subject in the sci-fi fields. In the meantime, the efforts of Russian biologist Ilya Ivanovic are one of the most famous and at the same time the most immoral projects to achieve this goal.

Ilia Ivanovich Ivanov became famous in the 1980s for her pioneering efforts to inoculate artificial animals. With the support of the Soviet government, he began a project aimed at creating human and chimpanzee hybrids. Ivanovic used two methods of artificial inoculation of female chimpanzees with human sperm and the artificial inoculation of volunteer women with chimpanzee sperm to perform this experiment. Ivanovich’s efforts not only faced scientific failure, but were also criticized for serious ethical issues, including the use of animals and humans, without conscious consent and dangerous genetic manipulation.

The controversial claim of American evolutionary psychologist

The report of the American Evolutionary Psychologist Gordon Gallup in an interview with The Sun about the creation of a human-shampschine hybrid in the 1980s in Orange Park, Florida, is a very controversial claim without providing certified evidence. In 2018, Gallup made this claim based on information obtained from an anonymous “scientist”.

According to her research center, a female chimpanzee is inoculated with an anonymous donor sperm and has led to the birth of a baby with a human appearance but with many hair. After birth, scientists decided to kill the baby by examining the ethical and scientific consequences of the experiment.

Lack of scientific evidence and contradictions in the claim of Gallop

Gordon Gallup’s claim to be successful in producing a human-shampschose hybrid in the 1980s, despite its attractiveness, is extremely unacceptable. The sentence “A reputable scientist told me” without providing any documentary evidence, names or any other approved information cannot be considered a reliable evidence for such an extraordinary claim.

In addition to the lack of evidence, there are significant scientific and genetic barriers to the production of a human-shampschose hybrid. While some scientists believe that the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees could have been reproductive until 4 million years ago (our last ancestor lived about 6 to 7 million years ago), this claim is still under discussion.

Genetic challenges in the claim.

Genetic research has shown that the genetic split time in the X chromosome between humans and chimpanzees is shorter than expected. This may mean that some kind of genetic exchange occurred in a distant past between the two species. But this certainly does not indicate the successful intercourse of these two species in recent times and can be due to other mechanisms such as natural choice.

Also, though in the nature of species with relatively similar genetic distances of humans and chimpanzees, such as horses and zebra, they can produce hybrid children, these children are usually infertile. Even if we assume that the genetic resemblance of humans and chimpanzees is enough to lead to the formation of the fetus, the possibility of fetal survival is very low and unlikely. This is due to the significant genetic and physiological differences between the two species.

Differences in the number of chromosomes, genetic structure, and physiological adaptations can seriously endanger the process of forming and growing a hybrid fetus and lead to abortion or infant death. Finally, given the lack of reliable evidence, major scientific and genetic barriers and other factors of Gallop’s claim must be examined with great doubt.

Also read