\n
Samsung on the second day of March 2025 of two Phone He unveiled his new mid -range. The Galaxy A36 and the Galaxy A56 are the two mid -range that came to the market with attractive upgrades compared to the previous generation. The A36 should actually know another version of the Galaxy A55, but on the other hand the Galaxy A56 is a relatively new handset with great features. But the question that comes up is this; Given the price difference that these two products have, what is their situation? Is it more logical to buy the Galaxy A36 or the Galaxy A56? In this post we are going to compare the Galaxy A36 with the Galaxy A56 to answer the question that The best Samsung mid -range handset Which is.
\n\n
31,950,000 Toman
\t
\n
25,100,000 Toman
\t
\n
\n
\n
Compare Galaxy A36 with Galaxy A56; Technical specifications table
\n
The first comparison section is dedicated to the technical specifications of the two phones. Before starting the comparison, it is best to look at the specifications of the Galaxy A36 and the Galaxy A56 on paper to see what their status is. Then we will continue to examine the details more completely and more accurately.
\n
| Name of the phone | Galaxy A56 | Galaxy A36 |
| Dimensions | 162.2 × 77.5 x 7.4 mm | 162.9 78.2 × 7.4 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g |
| Body material | Gorilla Glass Glass Victus Plus and Aluminum | Gorilla Glass Glass Victus Plus and Plastic |
| Water resistance | ✅IP67 – up to 1 meter deep for 30 minutes | |
| Two SIM cards | Nanu | \n |
| Display type | Super AMOLED with 120 Hz Refresh and Lighting 1900 Nits | |
| Support +HDR10 | ✅ # | ❌ |
| Panel size | 6.7 inches – 110.2 cm | \n |
| Plate -to -body ratio | % 87.7 | % 86.5 |
| Image resolution | 1080 × 2340 pixels | |
| Page protector | با | |
| The screen always bright | ✅ # | |
| Operating system and interface | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Software support time | 6 years | |
| CPU | Exynos 1580 | Snapdragon 6 generation 3 |
| CPU specifications | 1 Cortex-A720 core with 2.9 GHz frequency, 3 Cortex-A720 cores with 2.6 GHz, 4 Cortex-A520 cores with 1.9 GHz frequency | 4 Cortex-A78 cores with 2.4 frequency and 4 Cortex-A55 cores with 1.8 GHz frequency |
| Graphic processor | XCCLIPSE 540 | Adreno 710 |
| The memory card port | ❌ | |
| The combination of RAM and internal memory | 128/8, 256/8, 256/12 GB | 128/8, 256/8 GB |
| Memory type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main camera | 50 megapixel f/1.8 | |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 inches | 1/1.96 -inch |
| Optical stabilizer | ✅ # | |
| Second Camera | 12 -megapixel with 123 -degree angle | 8 -megapixel wide -angle with 123 -degree angle |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 inches | 1/4.0 inches |
| Third Camera | 5 megapixel macro | |
| 4K filming | ✅30 frames | |
| 1080p filming | ✅30/60 frames | |
| Salafi Camera | 12 -megapixel f/2.2 | |
| 4K filming | ✅30 frames | |
| 1080p filming | ✅30/60 frames | ✅30 frames |
| Strine Speaker | Hybrid | |
| 3.5mm jack | ❌ | |
| FM Radio | ❌ | |
| Bluetooth | ✅5.4 | ✅ 5.3 |
| Fingerprint sensor | ار Optical display | |
| Artificial Intelligence | ❌ | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | |
| Charger | 45 watts | |
| Charger inside the box | ❌ | \n |
| Color | Pink, olive, graffiti, light gray | Purple, black, white and lemon |
| Price range | 28.5 to 36 million | 23.5 to 25 million |
\n
As you can see, both the Galaxy A36 and the Galaxy A56 are fundamentally different in a series of sections, but in most parts there is no difference. In the meantime, the price difference between these two phones in Configuration is at least 5 and a maximum of 11 million USD; No matter how 45 watts for both phones, we will see a similar price increase. However, we need to compare and compare the Galaxy A36 with the Galaxy A56 to see if they are really slightly minor.
\n
\n
Contents within the box; What is the inside packaging of the Galaxy A56 and A36?
\n
Given Samsung’s recent policies, it is no wonder that neither of the Galaxy A56 and the Galaxy A36 offers special accessories in their box. The process of removing the charger and accessories first started from the flagship series, and has been fully reached by mid -range phones for many years. As a result, there is only one USB-C cable to USB-C and the phone itself; There is no charging adapter, no protective frame, not even hands -free.
\n
\n
Samsung has introduced the decision as part of the environmental conservation approach, but an extra cost is imposed on the user to buy a 45 -watt charger in addition to the phone itself. So if you want to buy any of these phones, it is best to plan a suitable charger adapter (preferably 45 watts) and protective frames.
\n
\n
\n
Comparison of the design and quality of the Galaxy A36 with the Galaxy A56
\n
Galaxy A56 and Galaxy A36 are very similar in design; To the extent that at first glance they can hardly be distinguished. Both phones use a common design language, including a flat display, a flat frame with a bump in the hardware keys and smooth edges. In the back, only if you look closely at the design of the camera module, you may notice a very slight difference in its form or texture. These similarities make it visually transmitted from both models.
\n
Galaxy A36 Black, Galaxy A56 Silver
\n
The dimensions of these two phones are not much different. The Galaxy A36 is 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm only a little taller and wider than the A56, which has a dimension of 162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm. This difference is not tangible in practice and does not make any difference in the hands of the pocket or in the pocket. The thickness of both models is exactly the same, so in terms of design elegance, none have a tangible superiority.
\n
The conditions are almost equal in weight. The Galaxy A36, weighing 195 grams, is only 3 grams lighter than the Galaxy A56, weighing 198 grams. This difference is very small and not felt in normal use. Both phones have a balanced sense, not too light nor heavy annoying.
\n
The welcome of these two models is no different. Depending on the dimensions and weight of approximately the same, the experience in both devices is similar. Symmetrical design, smooth edges, and thick thickness make both phones feel good and not boring in long -term use.
\n
Galaxy A36 down, Galaxy A56 Top
\n
The main difference starts from the quality of the construction. The Galaxy A56 is made with a more durable aluminum frame and conveys in a higher quality sense. In contrast, the Galaxy A36 uses a plastic frame, which is lighter, but does not feel the luxury A56. This difference is the main point in terms of construction quality between the two models. From the sense of premium, the aluminum of the Galaxy A56 frame makes you feel the temperature earlier and more when hot. But on the other hand, our broadcast is better.
\n
Galaxy A36 down, Galaxy A56 Top
\n
Despite the difference in the frame, both phones in other parts use Gorilla Glass Victus Plus resistant glass for the front and rear panel. This means that the surface resistance to the line and impact is largely equal. Also, both devices have an IP67 certificate that make them resistant to dust and water (up to 1 meter deep for 30 minutes).
\n
Finally, although the Galaxy A36 has more happier and diverse colors that may be more appealing to some users, the Galaxy A56 has a luxurious feeling using more metal materials. Therefore, the choice between the two is more about the personal priority in designing and touching the body of the body than the actual difference in dimensions or weight.
\n
\n
Galaxy A36 vs. Galaxy A56; Porters and connections
\n
One of the major changes to both the Galaxy A56 and the Galaxy A36 compared to the previous generation is the removal of the microSD port. While last year’s models supported the memory card, none of these phones have this feature this year. The only exception among Samsung’s intercourse this year is the Galaxy A26, which has continued to use MicroSD.
\n
The buttons and control features are also very similar to the two models. Both phones are equipped with an optical fingerprint sensor under the screen that delivers quick and accurate performance. Also, the presence of stereo speakers in both models has provided users with satisfactory voice experience; Especially in watching video or running games.
\n
Galaxy A36
\n
In the field of wireless communications, the Galaxy A56 and A36 both use 5G networks with support for SA and NSA SUB-6 bands. This support is provided to users both through two nano -physical SIM cards and through the possibility of using two ESIMs. Therefore, both phones are completely up -to -date in terms of flexibility to connect to mobile networks.
\n
In the local communications section, both phones support the Wi-Fi 6 Wi-Fi Wi-Fi, which brings fast and sustainable connection. The NFC feature is also present in both models, although in some markets this feature may be inactive. However, both handsets lack a 3.5mm headphone and FM radio; A point that may not be very pleasant for some traditional users.
\n
Galaxy A56
\n
The only minor and interesting difference between these two models is the Bluetooth version. The Galaxy A56 uses Bluetooth 5.3, while the A36 is unexpectedly equipped with the newer version 5.4. Although this difference does not have much effect on everyday use, it may be involved in certain specific applications such as connecting newer gadgets or transmitting low -use data.
\n
\n
Galaxy A56 display quality compared to Galaxy A36
\n
Both the Galaxy A56 and the Galaxy A36 use the 6.7 -inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 120 Hz, which gives you a smooth and transparent experience in scrolling, playing and everyday use. The maximum brightness of about 1,200 nits in real conditions has also made them perform well under the sun. Although there is no difference between the two screens at first glance, the display -to -body ratio in the A56 is about 87.7 % and the A36 is slightly lower and equal to 86.5 %; This means that the margins around the screen in the A36 are a little more, although this difference is less common in normal use.
\n
Galaxy A36
\n
Another important difference is the support for the HDR10+ standard in the Galaxy A56; The capability that is deleted in A36. Although both phones are doing well in watching video content, when playing HDR videos, the A56 displays the colors with higher contrast and dynamics because of this support. In contrast, the A36 in the broadcast of this type of content may be slightly lower than expected. Of course, this difference is mainly tangible when displaying specific HDR format videos, and you will probably not feel any different differences in everyday use such as web browsing, social networks or common games.
\n
Galaxy A56
\n
Both screens are protected by a layer of Gorilla Glass Victus Plus; Resistant glass that performs well both against impact and line. The presence of this glass in both models makes it easier for users to have the durability of the display, making the A36 and A56 even on the same level. Therefore, if your use is more common in general and common applications, you will have an almost equal experience of both phones; But if HDR content is a serious part of your media consumption, the A56 will be a better choice.
\n
\n
Galaxy A56’s battery life and speed of the Galaxy A36
\n
Battery life
\n
Both the Galaxy A56 and the Galaxy A36 use a 5000 mAh battery, and because their display, capacity and base consumption are almost the same, we expect close performance. Standard tests are also highly confirmed, however, there are differences in specific applications that can be due to the difference between chipset and software optimization.
\n
\n
The Galaxy A56 performs better in video and video conversation and lasts more time. In contrast, the Galaxy A36 lasts more than an hour in the games. Since the Galaxy A56 is better and more powerful, so you can’t say if you are interested in the game. Because neither this clock difference between them is very gross, nor the Galaxy A36 in terms of processing and graphic power of A56.
\n
| Name of the phone | Galaxy A36 | Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | |
| Daily use (Active Use) | 11: 38H | 12: 08H |
| Conversation | 27: 46h | 34: 02H |
| Web review | 11: 41H | 12: 27h |
| Video playback | 12: 08H | 16: 22h |
| Play | 7: 03h | 5: 52H |
\n
Charging speed
\n
The comparison of the Galaxy A56 and A36 in the charger speed section brings us almost the same result. Because both phones support a 45 -watt fast charge with Power Delivery technology. Their full charge takes about 73 to 74 minutes, which is an acceptable number for Samsung mid -range phones, although it is still slower than some competitors.
\n
| Name of the phone | Galaxy A36 | Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Charging power | 45 watts | 45 watts |
| Recharge in 15 minutes | 36 % | 38 % |
| Charging in 30 minutes | 60 % | 65 % |
| Full charge | 74 minutes | 73 minutes |
\n
Interestingly, the slight difference in the charging curve is between the two phones. The Galaxy A56 is 38 % in 15 minutes and A36 during the same period. These minor differences are probably not as noticeable in practice, but are recorded in detailed tests.
\n
\n
Comparison of the Speaker and Galaxy A56’s sound quality with A36
\n
The Galaxy A56 and A36 are equipped with stereo speakers. The combination of a main speaker on the lower edge and a second speaker that integrates with the speaker speaker provides a great audio experience. In audio tests, both models appeared with “good” and the same sound of the same sound 26.2-LUFS.
\n
\n
The sound of both phones is similar. A warm sound, with a good depth and low distortion that even offers the user with a high -profile sound experience. In fact, there is no difference between the two phones in terms of sound quality and high quality, and the choice between them will depend on other features.
\n
\n
Comparison of Galaxy A36 camera with Galaxy A56
\n
Although in appearance, the camera modules of the Galaxy A36 and Galaxy A56 are not significantly different, when we enter the technical details, there are significant differences between the two models that affect the performance of the cameras in different light conditions. In the following, we carefully compare and compare the performance of the cameras in different situations.
\n
\n
At first glance, both handsets are equipped with a 50 -megapixel main camera, a 12 and 8 -megapixel superb camera (a larger Galaxy A56), a 5 -megapixel Macro, and a 12 -megapixel selfie camera. But the most important difference in the type of main camera sensor; The Galaxy A56 uses a larger Sony IMX906 sensor of 1.56 inches and 1.0 micrometer pixels, while the Galaxy A36 is equipped with a smaller Sony IMX882 sensor and 0.8 -micrometer pixels. The same difference in the sensor size makes the A56 performance better, especially in poor light conditions. Because the larger the sensor, the more capable of absorbing light.
\n\n
In daylight and when shooting with the main camera, the image quality of both phones is good, but if you carefully, the Galaxy A56 is superior to the more accurate reproduction of colors, better recording of intense shades and light details, and reducing noise.
\n\n
Especially when using a 2X digital zoom, the A56 images are clearer and more natural, while the A36 photos look a bit soft and flat. These differences are quite natural, and due to the differences in the size of the sensors as well as the price difference, they are quite expected. In fact, the important point is that the Galaxy A36 does not go beyond expectation.
\n\n
The super -wide camera is one of the points where the differences are more common. The Galaxy A56 uses a 12 -megapixel Sony IMX258 sensor with better detail and wider dynamic range, while the A36 uses the weaker 8 -megapixel Galaxycore GC08A3. In the images captured with the super -wide camera, the difference between resolution and better light control in the A56 is easily visible.
\n\n
In low or night environments, the difference in the quality of the two phones is quite evident. With a larger sensor and better processing algorithms, the Galaxy A56 has a more balanced exposure, captures bright points (such as lights) without excessive brightness, and works more natural in color regeneration. The A36 tends to tend to the yellow and red spectrum in these conditions and is accompanied by high exposure fluctuations.
\n\n
In terms of selfie camera, both phones have a 12 -megapixel camera paper, but the type of sensor is different; The Galaxy A56 uses the Samsung S5K3LC and the A36 of the Galaxycore GC12A2. Result? In actual images, both perform well, but zoom in detail, greater clarity of facial skin, tissues and color depths in A56 selfie.
\n
In the video section, both phones can record 4K videos of acceptable quality with the main camera and in the right light. But the A36 is weaker in the dynamic range and tends to take the exposure to the dark. With better control of shades and details in bright areas, the Galaxy A56 produces more depth videos and more natural colors.
\n\n
A serious restriction on A36 in filming with the super -wide camera; Because it only supports 1080p resolution, while the A56 is capable of capturing 4K resolution. As a result, the A56’s superb videos are much clearer and better quality than the A36. Of course, fewer people work with a wide -angle camera, and all a user uses the phone is often summarized in the main camera and selfie, which is both superior to the Galaxy A56. Although this superiority is not as tangible to influence the user’s choice, a user will notice it.
\n
Overall, although the Galaxy A36 has a relatively good performance and can capture acceptable photos in good light conditions, the Galaxy A56 offers better results in most scenarios due to a larger sensor, better processing, and a stronger wide -angle camera.
\n
\n
Software and hardware; Is the Galaxy A56 more suitable for game or A36?
\n
Software
\n
Both the Galaxy A56 and the Galaxy A36 have come on with the latest version of Samsung’s One UI 7 based on Android 15. In terms of software support, they also have great conditions; Samsung has promised that both models, 6 years of security update and 6 versions of the operating system upgrades. This means that in the long run in terms of security and facilities, none will be left behind and will receive updates even in 2030.
\n
\n
While the Android version, the interface and the length of support are the same, the user experience in practice is a bit different. The main reason is the hardware power. With its powerful processor, the Galaxy A56 runs the user interface more smoothly, and is felt faster and less in the faster and less infallible in everyday use, programs opening, moving between pages and artificial intelligence performance. So, if you are looking for a faster and softer experience, the A56 is a better option.
\n
\n
The Galaxy A56 is equipped with the Exynos 1580 chipset, while the A36 uses the Snapdragon 6 generation 3. This difference of the processor not only affects the speed of the user interface, but also has a direct impact on graphic performance and multiple tasks simultaneously. In addition, the 12GB A56 RAM compared to the 8GB A36 RAM is an important advantage in running better games, heavy programs and generally multiple apps at the same time.
\n
It goes without saying that both phones come with 128 GB base memory, but the type of memory is different. The A56 uses UFS 3.1 memory, which has much higher reading and writing speed than the UFS 2.2 used in the A36. This makes programs open faster, files move faster, and the overall experience is smoother. Of course, the A36 is a fast handset, but it doesn’t reach the A56.
\n
According to the tests, the A56 processor and graphics performance are superior to all areas. In the table below you can see and compare the exact difference between the processing power of the A56 and A36.
\n
| Benchmark | Galaxy A36 | Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Gickebench 6 (single -core) | 1019 | 1361 |
| Gickebench 6 (multi -nucleus) | 2915 | 3894 |
| 3dmark Extreme (High) | 914 | 1322 |
| 3dmark Extreme (Low) | 909 | 1313 |
\n
As you can see, the difference is significant in all four tests, which means you will definitely have a better experience with the Galaxy A56. This difference will be noticeable, and it is not like you don’t understand it.
\n
In applications such as photo editing, video, work with heavy apps or more at the same time, the Galaxy A56 is more powerful. Higher RAM, better graphics, and faster memory, all have made it even more stable than the A36 for long -term use. So for more professional users, the A56 will be a safer option.
\n
\n
If you are a player, the Galaxy A56 is undoubtedly a better choice. The more stable frame rate, the more controlled temperature and the game’s smoother performance, thanks to the stronger graphics processor and the faster memory are possible in this model. In heavy games like the Genshin Impact or PUBG, the Galaxy A36 also performs well, but it will be more noticeable in frame and leaf.
\n
Talking about the stability we have to say, in general, both phones have shown a similar situation in the tests. But their status is generally as follows. In the table you can more easily see these differences.
\n
| Name of the phone | Galaxy A56 | Galaxy A36 |
| Processing stability in 1 hour | % 80 with high swing in the second 30 minutes | % 81 with high fluctuations from 90 to 80 % |
| Graphic stability in 10 minutes | % 99.4 | \n |
| Battery charging drop | From 91 to 84 % | From 100 to 95 % |
| Temperature changes | From 26 to 34 degrees | From 30 to 35 % |
| Frame rate | 5 to 11 frames per second | 4 to 7 frames per second |
\n
As you can see, in heavy use, the Galaxy A56 rose by about 9 degrees, but the Galaxy A36 is just 5 degrees. But if you look closely, you will see that even in this case the Galaxy A56 is 1 degree less temperature. Of course, the test has been done when the initial temperature of the Galaxy A56 was lower, which means that the test room temperature may be different.
\n\n
But in general, both phones do not increase the temperature and remain in the range. There is a significant difference in terms of frame rates. This means you will experience a much better situation with the Galaxy A56.
\n
\n
Which intercourse is more worth the purchase; Galaxy A36 or Galaxy A56?
\n
If you are looking for a smoother, more quality and more sustainable experience in the long run, the Galaxy A56 will undoubtedly be a better choice for you. With a more durable aluminum frame, the more powerful Exynos 1580 processor and more RAM, it not only offers faster performance, but also provides better access to various software capabilities. Also, in areas such as camera quality and memory, the performance of the Galaxy A56 is better.
\n
\n
On the other hand, if you do not intend to pay more and your expectations are at a more normal level, the Galaxy A36 is still an economic and valuable choice. This model offers the same quality display, one UI 7 based on Android 15, and a 6 -year software support duration. Even the overall performance of the camera and speakers is very close to the A56. So if you do not need high processing power or speed, the A36 will still meet your daily needs.
\n
Overall, the Galaxy A56 is a more powerful and forward -looking device that offers tangible features in the hardware and user experience with about 30 % more. But if your priority is to save money and you have a standard display, battery and software stability, the Galaxy A36 can also be a reasonable and affordable choice.
\n
Choose Galaxy A56 if;
\n
- \n
- Processing power is very important to you
- You want a better camera
- Better build quality is an important issue for you.
\n
\n
\n
\n
Choose Galaxy A36 if;
\n
- \n
- Have a specified and limited budget
- Looking for a good and powerful midterm
\n
\n
\n
Given the price difference of approximately 5 to 11 million Tomans, you think which handset is worth the purchase and the price difference. The best Samsung phone Is it in the category?
\n
31,950,000 Toman
\t
\n
25,100,000 Toman
\t
\n
Source: Phonearena
\n
Frequently asked questions about the Galaxy A36 and A56
\n
\n Is the Galaxy A36 more suitable for the game or A56?\n
\n
The Galaxy A56 is definitely a better option.
\n
\n
\n
\n Do the Galaxy A56 and A36 come with a charger?\n
\n
No. Neither of these handsets comes with a charger.
\n
\n
\n
\n Do the Galaxy A56 and A36 have a headphone jack?\n
\n
No. Neither of these two phones have a headphone jack.
\n
\n
\n
\n Does the Galaxy A56 and A36 are hot?\n
\n
No. Neither of the two phones is hot, but under the heavy pressure of the deeds, it rises to an end.
\n
\n
\n
\n Which phone is waterproof? Galaxy A56 or A36?\n
\n
Both phones are waterproof up to 1 meter deep.
\n
\n
\n
\n Which phone is faster? Galaxy A56 or A36?\n
\n
The Galaxy A56 is faster in doing different things because of its memory and processor.
\n
\n
\n
\n Does the Galaxy A36 have 12GB of RAM?\n
\n
No. Only the A56 uses this amount of RAM.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Latest Passing over countries : Spain | Dominica | United Arab Emirates
\n
RCO NEWS
