According to a report from Insider BusinessCompany Google Deepmind It has enacted the rules for employees that prohibit some of the UK -based employees from joining competing companies up to a year after leaving the organization. Some employees think of immigration to the United States to circumvent contract restrictions.
Consequently the constraints
The report points out that, according to several former employees, these agreements have become a controversial issue, especially given the intensity of global competition to attract artificial intelligence talents.
Restrictions vary depending on the role and level of employees. For example, six -month competition agreements are common for individual participants, but some senior scholars have come up with contracts that take up to six months. In some cases, employees are sent on a long -term leave called “garden leave” during which they receive their salaries; But other actively in Deepmind They don’t work.
Google Answer
A spokesman for Google has stated that the company’s contracts are “in accordance with market standards” and that non -competitive agreements are only selectively used to protect the company’s commercial interests.
Criticism of former employees
However, some former employees Deepmind They believe that these restrictions limit their ability to follow new opportunities, especially when other artificial intelligence companies expand their activities and seek to attract talent. One of the former employees described the one -year expectation as “a very long time in artificial intelligence”, referring to the evolution of the field.
General reaction
This is the subject of last week after Nando de freshDeputy of Microsoft Artificial Intelligence Department and former manager DeepmindIn a post on social network X Paying this issue attracted public attention. He claimed that the staff Deepmind They often want advice on how to get out of their contracts. De Freitas Encouraged staff not to sign such agreements and from senior executives Deepmind That is opposed to this policy.
Legal restrictions in Britain and America
In the UK, non -competitive sections are applicable when they are rational and necessary to protect the interests of the company. On the contrary, states such as California in the US, which is home to many of the major technology companies, do not recognize such agreements even if signed. The law adopted in year 6 further expanded the ban on non -competitiveness in California.
Impacts on employees
Some employees have thought of immigration to the United States to circumvent these restrictions. Others are worried that these bonds will lose job opportunities at fast -paced startups, as these companies may not be able to wait several months for new employees.
Similarities to other industries
Observers point that non -competitiveness agreements in the field of artificial intelligence have similarities to similar issues in the financial industry, where companies have long used such tactics to maintain key talents. With the continued investment in productive artificial intelligence and increased competition, this legal provisions have become a central issue in competition for technical expertise.
RCO NEWS