The Role of Romantic Relationships in the Scientific Advances of Human

According to RCO News Agency, According to statistics, in the 1980s for every 5 people in the United States, two marriages were formed annually. So we have come to the statistics of the 1980s that this decade was a decade of new inventions.

Now we want to know how much love at that time influenced engineering, architecture and science? Have hormones such as oxytocin, vasopressin and dopamine make people more creative or have love alone inspiring? Which couples have been scientists and celebrities who are considered evidence of the impact of love on innovation?

New research has shown that key hormones such as oxytocin that deepen the appeal or vasopressin that stimulates the emotion or dopamine, often secreted in loving moments, play an important role in love.

Scientific studies show that romantic relationships can be an important source of health. Scientists also emphasize that investing in romantic growth in adulthood is essential for public health and happiness.

When we look at history, we find that many couples have combined love with engineering and science and have shown that love can be useful for both the individual and the whole world.

Robert J. Sternberg, a professor of human development at the University of Cornell, explains that love is always inspiring. He says technology has made it easier for people we could never deal with in the absence of technology.

Sternberg believes that despite these changes, love itself has not changed fundamentally. What has changed is how people express it and whether they succeed or fail.

Love in the role of a driving force

Some couples have left an impossible effect on the history of science. Marie and Pierre Curie are among the most famous scientific partners. “Pierre” stopped her research on crystals and symmetry to join Marie in her radioactive field.

They won the Nobel Prize in Physics in Year 2.

At the same time, although Albert Einstein once described his wife Mileva Marić as a not -so -pleasant phrases, evidence suggests that Maric has been involved in Einstein’s early work.

Gretty and Carl Cori were a couple who discovered the Cori Cycle cycle and explained how energy was produced and consumed in the body. They won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008, and Gret Corey was the first American woman to receive the Nobel Prize.

Another of the most notable couples in the field of engineering were Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, who pioneered motor studies as an important industrial technique in the early 1980s.

Meanwhile, Emily Boole supported George Boole in the development of computer logic algebra and once again showed how love can foster scientific discovery.

In architecture, the Eiffel Tower still symbolizes the love and inspiration of many love stories. In our current era, Ughur Shahin and Dr. Ozlem Türeci are a wife and husband who, as the founders of Biontech, were able to develop the first Corona vaccine in the midst of the epidemic of Kavid-1.

From the initiative to the invention

Peter D. Peter D. Norton, an associate professor of history at the Department of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia, is looking for this in ancient stories.

Norton refers to Ferdinand Cheval, a French postman who spent five years collecting stone for his “ideal palace” by resorting to the power of love. It was a self -taught engineering project that she dedicated to calling the queen of the world. It has been a powerful manifestation of personal love and insight.

According to Norton, while costs and profits can lead large engineering projects, individual motivations can still be romantic.

For example, Emily Warren Roebling’s husband, Washington, was managed by Brooklyn Paul, but fell into bed due to “Kisson’s disease”. For this reason, Emily, with an exemplary sacrifice, took on the role of her husband for the project to be completed.

Emily became Washington’s eye and ears at the site of the bridge and proved that personal sacrifice could form some of the world’s biggest achievements.

The advancement of technology, greed and love

Norton warns that modern technology can be exposed to ambition, pride or greed. He points to former Vice President of General Motors Charles Kettering, who supported the dissatisfaction of consumers to increase fixed demand for new products.

“When love affects engineering, he usually does this by putting engineering,” he says. Engineering must serve the people, not vice versa. When technology progresses, it serves love.

The relationship between technology, social media, and romantic relationships are strangely complex. While technology can connect people together, it can also isolate them or unconsciously. Love can bring these problems in any engineering and scientific project, from small to large.

Norton also refers to an encouraging example. “When new biotechnological techniques raised ethical concerns, molecular biologists gathered in California to agree on the borders they should not cross,” he said.

Norton argues that love can shape our use of technology.

. According to him, Love can also refer to moral responsibility, compassion and foresight That engineers and scientists should welcome.

Precision is very important in science and engineering, but a human element is often behind any great achievement. Beyond romantic relationships, many scientists and engineers express deep love, which sometimes leads to Nobel awards.

Artificial intelligence

Today, the landscape of love has become more complex. New research suggests that people with anxiety may be prone to emotional dependence, including emotions similar to artificial intelligence. This is to some extent because artificial intelligence models can imitate the emotional intelligence and sociality of human beings.

While love can be a powerful source of inspiration, technology also has unique challenges. Creating a balance between human emotions and the advancement of technology is one of the key issues. As long as the hormones of love lead us to new and unknown paths, we must also keep our minds not to be captured by its deceit.

The end of the message