Why don’t the chats like Donald Trump?

The Republican official claims that chats such as ChatGpt, Gemini, Copilot and Meta AI have ranked Trump in the final when answering users’ questions about the performance of recent US presidents on Judetism. He described the issue as an example of “deceptive business behavior” and urged these companies to publish documents on how to refine and filter the user’s entry and produce answers.

In the official letters of Billy to senior executives of these companies, “these misleading answers to a simple question: Why do your robots ignore historical realities and promote a specific narrative?” However, many experts consider this claim to be baseless, because from a technical point of view, the ranking of political individuals or any other personality based on a mental value such as “Jewish opposition” is essentially tasteless and indescribable.

Strangely enough, one of the chats accused, Microsoft’s Copilot, has essentially refused to answer the question, but Bailey has still summoned Microsoft.

The main motivation for the move seems to be an attempt to gain political and media support from Trump’s supporters rather than being rooted in legal or technical concerns. This is not the first time that Andrew Bailey has entered controversial cases due to advertising actions in the media or new technologies; Earlier, his attempt to open a case against critics of Ilan Musk failed.

Finally, although the issue of bias is still in response to the critical social and political questions of the site, political abuse of this real challenge can affect the credibility of research and the path of technology development.