Meta’s director of global policy has backed calls for an iernational body to guide artificial ielligence legislation in an ierview. He says that if we liken this technology to the gia magic lamp, it is too late to put it back io the magic lamp, and couries should not legislate individually in this field.
Meta’s Nick Clegg recely talked about artificial ielligence in an ierview, The Guardian reported. He opposes paying coe producers or news services whose coe is used to train AI models. Clegg believes that this data is used under fair use mechanisms and that these mechanisms have shaped the infrastructure of the Iernet.
“Creators who engage in the use of artificial ielligence themselves, rather than trying to block or slow down the technology or fight the use of their work in these tools, will be better off in the long run than those who have gone in the opposite direction of the technology,” says Metta’s Director of Global Policy.
Nick Clegg coinued: “We believe we use (this data) in a way that fully complies with curre legislation. Much of this data is transformed io processes used in generative artificial ielligence models. “In the long term, I can’t imagine how to get this gia back io the magic lamp, because these models use information that is publicly available on the Iernet, and it’s not unreasonable to use it.”
Legislation for artificial ielligence should be universal
“Good laws will be multilateral or enforceable in differe jurisdictions,” said the meta manager of AI legislation. This technology is bigger than all companies and couries. “If legislation is done in a piecemeal way, it will fail.”
Clegg explained about the increasing power of AI models: “The main idea is how we, as a single universe, should react if AI reaches a high level of autonomy or autonomy. When we reach this poi, we cross the Rubicon. Of course, if we skip this poi, because there are differences between experts; Some say we will pass this poi in 18 mohs, but some say we won’t get there for another 80 years. But when we cross the Rubicon, we will be in a very differe world.”
