Comparison of A17 with A26; Which mid-range Samsung is more worth buying?

The two Galaxy A17 and Galaxy A26 models are fresh options from the Galaxy A series family, each of which tries to cover the diverse needs of users with a different approach. The difference between these two phones is not only in the appearance or the year of release, but also in key parts such as design and build quality, processing power, camera system, display and battery. A detailed comparison of these two models is not only important for potential buyers, but also a valuable guide for those who intend to upgrade from the older models of the A series. In this specialized review, we will compare A17 with A26 and show which one will be a more logical choice for different users.

25,519,500 Toman

500+ sales in the last week

500+ people have bought this product more than 2 times

500+ people are interested in this product

1000+ people in the shopping cart

10,000+ views in the last 24 hours

16,790,000 Toman

1000+ views in last 24 hours

20+ people in the shopping cart

Comparing the price of A17 with A26 in the Iranian market

Galaxy A17 comes with a competitive price due to its inclusion in the category of more economical phones of the A series. The 8 GB RAM and 256 GB internal memory version of this phone is in the range of 18.5 to 25.5 million Tomans. This price range makes A17 a good option for users who are looking for a mid-range phone with balanced specifications and lower cost. Of course, exchange rate fluctuations and price differences between sellers are effective in this period.

On the other hand, Galaxy A26 has a higher position in the mid-range market with slightly more advanced hardware specifications. The basic version of this phone with 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal memory is priced at around 19.5 to 22 million Tomans, while the 8.256 model is available up to 35 million Tomans. Although the price difference between A26 and A17 is not significant, considering the upgrade in processor, display and software capabilities, this price increase seems justified for users who are looking for a smoother experience and more features.

Contents inside the package A17 vs. A26

In the packaging of the Samsung Galaxy A17, as with many of the new mid-range devices of this brand, the bare minimum is provided. Inside the box, apart from the device itself, there is a USB Type-C to Type-C cable, SIM eject needle and manuals. On the other hand, the packaging of Galaxy A26 has a similar structure and users are faced with minimal content. In this model, only USB-C charging cable, SIM card needle and manuals are provided. Although the lack of a charger in the box may be a limitation for some users, Samsung has tried to define a consistent standard for its mid-range products by equating the contents of the box in different generations of the A series.

Design and build quality of A17 and A26

design

Both the Galaxy A17 and A26 have minimal designs, but there are subtle differences in their details. At 7.5mm thick and weighing 192g, the A17 is lighter and more comfortable to hold than the A26, making it more suitable for long-term users. On the other hand, A26 with a weight of 200 grams and a thickness of 7.7 mm conveys a more solid feeling. Both models use a plastic frame, but the difference in the back cover of the device is significant; The A17 uses a fiberglass panel that offers a modern and durable look, while the A26 uses a glass panel with a Gorilla Glass Victus + protective layer that has a more premium feel.

build quality

In the construction quality section, the main difference is in the type of protection and resistance standards. A17 uses Gorilla Glass Victus in the display section, which provides adequate resistance to scratches and shocks, but its back panel is not as resistant to pressure and scratches as real glass due to the use of fiberglass. In contrast, the A26 is covered with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, offering an extra level of protection. In addition, the certificate of resistance to the penetration of liquids and dust also shows the superiority of A26; With IP67, this phone can survive up to one meter of water for 30 minutes, while the A17 is only IP54 certified and only resistant to water splashes and dust.

Comparison of A17 display with A26

The display on both the Galaxy A17 and Galaxy A26 models is a turning point in their design, as Samsung has used a Super AMOLED panel for both devices. The quality of colors, black depth and viewing angle in both phones are the same and at a very favorable level. However, the key difference is in the page refresh rate; The A17 is equipped with a 90Hz refresh rate, which provides a smooth enough experience for everyday use, web browsing and light gaming, but the A26 with a 120Hz refresh rate offers a much smoother and more professional performance, especially for users who care about gaming and fast scrolling.

In terms of dimensions, resolution and pixel density, both models have similar conditions: 6.7 inches, 2340×1080 pixel resolution and 385ppi density. The screen-to-body ratio is slightly higher on the A26 (86.7% vs. 86% on the A17), which means narrower bezels and a more modern image. Also, both phones are equipped with a protective layer of Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, which provides good resistance to scratches and shocks (Mohs level 5).

Galaxy A17

Galaxy A26

Comparison of battery life and charger speed A17 and A26

battery

Both the Galaxy A17 and A26 are equipped with 5,000 mAh batteries, but in practice, their lifespans are not the same. The reason for this difference is the type and refresh rate of the display. The A17 is more energy efficient with its Super AMOLED display and 90 Hz refresh rate, so it offers slightly more battery life than the A26 in everyday use (browsing the web, social networks, and watching videos). On the contrary, A26 with 120 Hz display gives a smoother and more attractive experience of working with the phone, but the same higher refresh rate leads to increased energy consumption and the user may need to recharge about half a day earlier in heavy use.

charger

Both models support 25W wired charging technology and have no difference in theoretical charging speed. Due to the same battery capacity and charging power, the charging speed of the two phones is almost the same. Of course, due to the higher power consumption of the 120Hz display, A26 users may need to charge more often, although the recharge time is not significantly different from the A17.

Comparison of A17 and A26 software features

Both Galaxy A17 and A26 phones use Android 15 and One UI 7 user interface, and in terms of basic user experience, there is no noticeable difference. Both devices get Android 6 major updates, which puts them in the very promising mid-range category. This allows users to benefit from Samsung’s latest security and software features for several years without worry.

The key software difference is more apparent in the level of artificial intelligence features and user experience optimization. Due to the use of a newer processor and a smoother display, the A26 provides the basis for the implementation of AI capabilities with greater stability and speed. In contrast, the A17 offers the same capabilities but may be a bit slower in heavier processing such as AI image editing.

Galaxy A17

• AI Photo Remaster: Improve the quality of old photos by increasing sharpness and reducing noise.
• AI Call Assist: Ability to detect spam and manage anonymous calls.
• Live Translate: simultaneous translation of telephone conversations in several languages.
• Bixby Text Call: Text response to calls by converting voice to text.
• Object Eraser: Remove unwanted objects from images with artificial intelligence algorithms.

Galaxy A26

• Advanced AI Photo Remaster: Faster and more accurate processing with improved color and lighting.
• Generative Edit: background fill and creative image editing.
• Advanced AI Call Assist: call management with the ability to personalize intelligent responses.
• Live Translate integrated with messengers: instant translation of texts and messages in different applications.
• Intelligent Scene Optimization: automatic adjustment of image color and light according to the subject and environment.

Comparison of A17 and A26 hardware features

In hardware comparison, Galaxy A17 and A26 are both designed based on 5nm architecture, but the main difference is in the chip and processor combination. A17 with Exynos 1330 chip and arrangement of 2 powerful Cortex-A78 cores and 6 low-power Cortex-A55 cores provides balanced performance for daily use and multitasking. On the other hand, the A26 with the more powerful Exynos 1380 chip in the global version (4 Cortex-A78 cores) provides the user with twice the processing power for heavier tasks. This difference, especially in the execution of graphic games and processing-oriented applications, makes the A26 a noticeable advantage.

In terms of GPU, the A26 with Mali-G68 MP5 has higher graphics processing power than the Mali-G68 MP2 in A17, which means smoother frame rates in 3D games and better graphics rendering. Both phones come in different configurations of RAM (4 to 8 GB) and internal memory (up to 256 GB), but the A26 is considered a more professional option for users who are interested in gaming, photo and video editing, or heavy multitasking, thanks to a more powerful GPU and more advanced processing configuration; While A17 is designed for everyday and economic use.

Comparison of processor and benchmark according to Phonearena

A17 and A26 camera comparison in terms of photography and videography

Both Galaxy A17 and A26 phones use a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization, which maintains the quality of photography in daylight and even low-light conditions at a suitable level. However, the A26 is faster and more accurate in focusing on the subject thanks to the Phase Detection Focusing (PDAF) system, which is an advantage in portrait photography and capturing moving subjects. In addition, the difference in the ultra-wide camera is also significant; The A26’s 8-megapixel 120-degree sensor captures more detail and offers a wider angle than the A17’s 5-megapixel lens.

In the filming department, the superiority of A26 is noticeable. This model is capable of 4K@30fps video recording, while the A17 is limited to 1080p@30fps. Also, A26 provides the possibility of 720p slow-motion video recording at 480fps, which is more attractive for users interested in producing video content. Both phones have a 13-megapixel selfie camera, but the difference in aperture makes the A17 perform slightly better in low-light conditions.

Galaxy A17

Galaxy A26

Galaxy A17 and A26 camera performance by Phonearena

Comparison of A17 and A26; summary

The Galaxy A17 and A26 are both billed as powerful A-series mid-rangers, but have different priorities and target audiences. A17 focuses more on providing a balanced and economical experience; The Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, better battery charging in daily use, less weight and a selfie camera with a wider aperture make it a reasonable choice for users who are looking for a light, handy and affordable phone. But the limitation in filming (lack of support for 4K and slow motion) and the weakness of the ultra-wide camera show that this model is more designed for everyday use and normal users.

A26 is considered a more professional choice with noticeable improvements in the processor (Exynos 1380), more powerful graphics, 120 Hz display, IP67 resistance certificate and a more capable camera (PDAF, ultra-wide 8 megapixels, 4K video recording and slow motion). These features are especially valuable for users who are interested in content creation, gaming and heavier usage, although the higher battery consumption and heavier weight can be limiting for some. So if the main priority is price and charging, the A17 is a better choice, but for a more complete experience and more modern features, the A26 will be a better choice.

Source: GSMArena (1,2), phonearena (1,2)

25,519,500 Toman

500+ sales in the last week

500+ people have bought this product more than 2 times

500+ people are interested in this product

1000+ people in the shopping cart

10,000+ views in the last 24 hours

16,790,000 Toman

1000+ views in last 24 hours

20+ people in the shopping cart