New studies by Yale University researchers show that the effect of artificial ielligence on employme was not as serious as it was thought, and that some people have merely had extreme concerns about the loss of jobs by the technology.
Since the iroduction of ChatGPT by Openai in November, some experts have predicted that the model and other models of artificial ielligence would lead to couless jobs. This prediction is somewhat correct at first glance; Because we have been facing a wave of firings in the technology sector for many years.
The effect of artificial ielligence on employme is not so high
But a new study from Yale University has shown that the situation in the United States is quite the opposite, and that can be a good news for workers, as it coradicts the exaggerated forecasts of many technology companies.
“While concerns about the impact of artificial ielligence on today’s labor market, our data shows that these concerns are largely hypothetical,” the Budget Lab University Economic Policy Research Ceer writes in its report.
The research team has analyzed the job data for the past 6 mohs since the release of ChatGPT, the employme status of college graduates, and the risk of various workers’ groups against artificial ielligence technology.
In one analysis, they compared three groups of workers with differe levels of high, medium and low risk against artificial ielligence and examined changes in the share of each group in the workforce since the ChatGPT general release. If artificial ielligence had an impact on the amou of jobs, it would have been expected to reduce the share of high -iensity groups at the technology, but that has not been observed. In fact, the perceage of each category has been almost unchanged, indicating that artificial ielligence so far has had no effect on employme.
The researchers also found that the rate of change in the labor market after the emergence of artificial ielligence is roughly similar to that of computers and the Iernet. In other words, artificial ielligence seems to have been more destructive than these two technologies.
