If you are looking to buy a mid -range handset, the two fascinating options of the Galaxy A26 and the Poko M7 Pro are among the most popular choices in this price that have attracted users’ attention with their varied features. Comparison of the Galaxy A26 with the Poko M7 Pro shows that Samsung, with a long history of sustainable design and software with powerful hardware and competitive price, has both tried to provide a complete experience from everyday use to gaming. However, if we look at the camera and the quality of photography, software and hardware, the design and ultimately the price of each, we will notice the key differences in both phones. Here are some more reviews to make a safer choice.
21,600,000 Toman
300+ sales last week
+ 500 people have bought the product more than 5 times
500+ people are interested in this product
In the shopping cart 1000+ people
5000+ visits in the last 24 hours
22,240,000 Toman
200+ Sale Last Week
5000+ visits in the last 24 hours
Summary of Galaxy A26 comparison with Poko M7 Peru
Samsung Galaxy A26
- More durable design with IP67 Certificate and Gorilla Glass Victus+ glass
- Larger Super AMOLED display with live colors and 4 Hz renovation rates
- High software lifespan with 2 main Android and One UI 7 updates
- Three diverse lenses including ultrasound and macro with 4K filming
- 1 mAh battery with one -day durable use in conventional use
- 4 watt fast charging with a charge time of about 5 minutes
- Limit 2 megapixel selfie and lower charge speed than competitors
Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru
- Lighter design with IP64 Certificate and Gorilla Glass 5 Glass
- AMOLED display with more pixel density and a 2: 1 image ratio for film and game
- Dimensity 7025 Ultra Chip with Powerful GPU to run games
- The 2 -megapixel main camera with an open f/1.5 aperture and a 2 -megapixel selfie
- More complete packaging includes charger and protective frame inside the box
- 2 mAh battery with 4 -watt fast charge and full charge of about 5 minutes
The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a good choice for those who care about durability, high quality display and long software support. In contrast, the Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro with stronger hardware, faster charging and better selfie camera is a more attractive option for gamers and high -end users.
Compare the price of the Galaxy A26 with the Poko M7 Pro in the Iranian market
In the Iranian market, the price of the Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro are almost close to each other, both of which can be made in the range of 1 to 2 million tomans. The proximity to the price makes the final choice not only on cost when buying the phone, but also to other aspects such as the quality of the camera for photography and filming, the hardware power in running heavy games, software stability and design. So although both phones are in the same price, careful examination of personal features and needs can clarify the choice between the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Poko M7 Peru Xiaomi.
Contents inside the Galaxy A26 and Poko M7 Peru
| Galaxy A26 | Poko M7 Peru |
| Typed Charging Cable C | Typed Charging Cable C |
| SIM card needle | SIM card needle |
| – | Protective frame |
| – | Charger |
In the Galaxy A26 box, the phone is a Type C cable, a SIM card needle and a notebook, but no wall charger. But the Poko M7 Pro also also has a wall charger and a protective jelly frame. Therefore, the Poko packaging is more complete and the user can use the phone without the need for additional accessories.
Design and quality of Galaxy A26 against Poko M7 Pro
| Galaxy A26 | Poko M7 Peru |
| 4.3 x3.2 x3 mm | 1 x3.2 x3.5 mm |
| 1 gram | ۱۰۰ Gram |
Dust -resistant Water -resistant | Resistance to spraying water and dust |
| The front and back of the glass (Gorilla Glass Victus+)/ Plastic Side Frame | Glass (Gorilla Glass 5), Plastic Back and Side Frame |
| IP67 certificate of water and dust -resistant (up to 2 meters for 2 minutes) | IP64 Certificate of Dust and Dust Resistant |
Design
In design, both the Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro look modern and attractive, but there are significant differences in the details. The Galaxy A26 is 2.3 x 2.5 in thickness of 2 mm and a weight of 2 grams slightly larger and heavier than the Poko M7 Peru, but this has made it more durable.
Samsung uses Gorilla Glass Victus+ windshield for the front and back and holds the side frame plastic, while the Poko M7 Pro is less than 2 grams and 2 x 2.5 mm thick and is designed to be fully plastic and the back and frame is fully plastic.
Construction quality
In terms of construction quality, the Galaxy A26 with a valid IP67 certificate is capable of resisting dust and even immersion in water up to one meter for 5 minutes, while the Poko M7 Pro provides only IP64 certificate, which means dust resistance and water spraying, not immersion. So although both phones look significantly, but in terms of construction quality and environmental resistance, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is one step ahead of the Poko M7 Peru Xiaomi.
Galaxy A26 display against Poko M7 Peru
| Ability | Galaxy A26 | Poko M7 Peru |
| Display technology | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Image update rate | 1 Hz | 1 Hz |
| Size | 4.3 inches | 4.3 inches |
| The ratio of the screen to the body | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Image ratio | 2.3: 1 | 1: 1 |
| Screen resolution | ۱۰۰۰ x۲۴۴ pixel | ۱۰۰۰ x۲۰۰ pixel |
| Pixel density | 1 pixels per inch | 1 pixel per inch |
Both the Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro provide a close -up experience, but minor differences can affect users’ choice. The Galaxy A26, with a 5.5 -inch Super AMOLED display, exhibits live and deeper contrast colors, while the Poko M7 Pro comes with an AMOLED panel and a slightly smaller dimensions of 4.7 inches.
The 5 Hz renovation rate is seen in both cases, which provides a high psychology in scrolling and playing games. The screen -to -body ratio in Poko is slightly higher and 4.9 percent, which makes the margins less appear, while the Galaxy A26 still has an attractive design with a ratio of 4.7 percent.
The difference in the image ratio is also noticeable; Samsung uses a 2.3: 1 standard, which is a little wider, but Xiaomi with a 1: 2 ratio will be a more drawn and convenient option to watch movies and games. In terms of resolution, the Galaxy A26 has a resolution of 2 x 2 pixels and a density of 2 pixels per inch, while the Poko M7 Pro exhibits more resolution at a slight resolution of 2 x 2 pixels and 2 pixels per inch.
Overall, the Galaxy A26 is a great choice with Super AMOLED technology and eye -catching colors, while the Poko M7 Pro, with a higher pixel density and a more drawn image, provides more fun to display details and watch video content.
Galaxy A26
Positive Tips
- Using Super AMOLED technology with contrast and more vibrant colors than conventional AMOLED
- A larger 4.7 -inch display, perfect for video and playing
- Renovation rate of 4 Hz for scroll and playing
- Image ratio of 2.3: 1 that is more natural for everyday use and social networks
Negative points
- Lower pixel density
- Screen -to -body ratio slightly less (1.5%), which means higher margins
Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru
Positive Tips
- AMOLED panel with a slightly higher resolution (1.2) compared to A26
- More pixel density that increases the clarity of detail and text
- Screen -to -body ratio (1.5%) and less margins
- Image 2: 1 ratio that provides a better experience in watching movies and full -page games
Negative points
- Renovation rate of 1 Hz similar to a rival
- AMOLED screen technology instead of Super AMOLED, which works slightly in color display than Samsung
- The size of a slightly smaller display (1.5 inches) than A26
PHONEARNA comparison table comparison table
| Feature | Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution / size | 1080p / 6.7 inches | 1080p / 6.67 inches |
| Maximum brightness (20% APL) | 1083 (average) | 1831 (Great) |
| Maximum brightness (100% APL) | 735 (average) | 1296 (great) |
| Minimum lighting | 1.7 (good) | 2.7 (average) |
| Color temperature | 6542 Kelvin | 6674 Kelvin |
| Gamma | 2 | 2.23 |
| Delta E (gray) | 2.77 (good) | 1.58 (great) |
| Delta E (colors) | 7.56 (average) | 4.07 (average) |
Comparison of battery life and speed of Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro
| Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
| 1 mAh | 1 mAh |
| 1 watt | 1 watt |
| Charging with wires | Charging with wires |
Battery
In terms of battery life, both the Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro are close together for everyday use and you can safely do your daily activities. The Galaxy A26 comes with a 2 mAh battery and the Poko M7 Pro with a slightly larger 2 mAh battery, which in practice does not make a significant difference, and both can last a full and even more day -to -day use, including web browsing, social networks and video watching. In heavier uses such as game or continuous stream, both phones still have a stable performance and users can count on their long -term charging.
| Feature | Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5110 mAh |
| Estimates of battery life (combined) | 5 hours and 21 minutes | 7 hours and 5 minutes |
| Web review | 11 hours and 14 minutes | 15 hours and 23 minutes |
| Video playback | 9 hours and 19 minutes | 11 hours and 3 minutes |
| Play (Gaming) | 5 hours and 9 minutes | 9 hours and 16 minutes |
Charger
When it comes to the speed of the charger, there is a significant difference between the two devices. The Samsung Galaxy A26 supports a 4 -watt fast charge, which is acceptable for a mid -range phone, but the full battery full speed will be a bit time consuming. In contrast, the Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro comes with a more powerful 2 -watt charger that is clearly charging and can dramatically reduce the user’s waiting time. So although both phones are close to the battery capacity, the Poko M7 Pro is superior to the battery capacity.
Charge Comparison Table in terms of Phonearena
| Feature | Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5110 mAh |
| Complete recharge (wired) | 1 hour and 29 minutes | 1 hour and 7 minutes |
| Wired Charging Power | 25 watts | 45 watts |
| Charging 30 minutes (wired) | 47% | 54% |
Galaxy A26 software facilities against the Poko M7 Pro
| Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
| Android 1 | Android 1 |
| One UI 7 | Hyperos 1.0 |
| ۲ Original Android update | ۲ Main update |
In the software view, the main difference between the Galaxy A26 and the Poko M7 Pro goes back to update and user interface policies. Samsung with the One UI 7 and the promise of six original Android updates shows that it focuses on the software life of its mid -range devices; This is a very valuable subject for users who keep the phone for several years. In contrast, the Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro with Hyperos 1.0 offers a new, lighter and full -fledged experience, but the software support period is shorter and in the global version it is usually limited to two main updates (in Europe to four updates). In terms of user experience, both phones are available with the new Android, but Samsung’s look is more of a stability and futurism, and Xiaomi’s view of fast innovation and a variety of moments.
Galaxy A26
- AI Photo Remaster capability to improve quality and remove images noise
- Live translation and subtitles in calls and videos with the help of Galaxy AI
- Smart search in gallery and files by detecting text and objects
- Smart text and editor suggestions in Samsung Keyboard
- Optimized artificial intelligence processing for background energy consumption
Poko M7 Peru
- AI Image Enhancement to improve color and images details in the gallery
- Smart Assistant and Dynamic Suggestions on Hyperos for faster access
- AI Call Summary (Smart Summary of Conversations and Calls)
- Intelligent energy management and automatic battery optimization based on use pattern
- Intelligent customization of themes and widgets tailored to user behavior
Galaxy A26’s hardware facilities against the Poko M7 Pro
| Hardware | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
| Chip | ۲۰۰۰ Exynos (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 NM) |
| CPU | Cortex-A78-Cortex-A55 Coretx-A55 Four Coretx-A78 Core Core Corex-A78) | Cortex-A78-Cortex-6 GHz Coretx-A55 (Cortex-A78 Core Core 1.2 GHz Corex-A78 |
| CPU frequency | 4.3.1 GHz | 4.3 – 1.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali68-G MP5 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Memory/RAM | 1/4 – 1/4 – 1/4 – 2/4 – 2/4 | 1/4 – 1/4 – 2/4 – 1/4 |
The Galaxy A26 with the Exynos 1380 chip (2nm) and the Poko M7 Pro with the Dimensity 7025 Ultra chipset (2nm) are both strong mid -range phones. Poko works better in long processing due to six low -powered nuclei. The Poko BXM-8-256 GPU is more suitable for the game, while Samsung uses the Mali68-G MP5.
The variety of memory and RAM is also one of the strengths of the A26, which is available in versions 1, 2 and 2GB of RAM, but the Poko M7 Pro is a higher level and even has a 2GB version with 2GB of internal storage. As a result, it can be said that Samsung focuses more on the balance of hardware and stability, while Xiaomi has moved towards higher performance and wider memory choices.
Comparison of CPU and benchmark in terms of Phonearena
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 2001 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1030 | 951 |
| Geekbench 6 (multicolor) | 2821 | 2316 |
| 3D Mark (High) | 796 | Not tested |
| 3D Mark (Low) | 789 | Not tested |
Comparison of the Galaxy A26’s camera against the Poko M7 Pro
| Camera feature | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
| Main camera | 1 megapixel, f/1.8, optical stabilizer (OIS) | 1 megapixel, f/1.5, optical stabilizer (OIS) |
| Second Camera | 2 megapixels of the Ultrawide with a 2 degree angle | 2 megapixel depth measuring |
| Third Camera | 2 megapixels of the macro | – |
| Camera features | LED Flash, Panorama, HDR | LED Flash, HDR |
| Filming (back) | 4K with 2 frames, full -fired 2 frames, 720p slopes with 2 frames, digital stabilizer | FullHD with 2 frames |
| Salafi Camera | 1 megapixel, f/2.2 (wide) | 1 megapixel, f/2.2 (widespread) |
| Filming (Salafi) | FullHD with 2 frames | FullHD with 2 frames |
Comparison of the Galaxy A26’s camera against the Poko M7 Pro in terms of photography and filming
The Galaxy A26 and the Poko M7 Pro both have a 2 -megapixel main camera, but the A26 provides more photo variety with three lenses (main, super -wide, macro), while Pooco works better with lighter lens (F/1.5) in low light. A26 to 4K and Slommaring, but Poko only records full HD. The Poko -megapixel selfie camera takes clearer photos, with a more natural quality A26. In general, if you want a variety of filming and lenses, the A26 is better, and Poko is a better option for low -light and selfie shooting.
Samsung Galaxy A26
Positive Tips
- There are three diverse lenses (wide, ultrasound and macro)
- 4K and Slow Movie feature
- Optical stabilizer on the main camera
- More diversity in photography styles
Negative points
- 2 -megapixel selfie camera
- Moderate performance in night photography
Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru
Positive Tips
- The main lens with a more open aperture (f/1.5) and the higher performance in low light
- More detailed 2 -megapixel selfie camera
- More sharp and brighter images in dark environments
Negative points
- Lack of ultrasound lens and macro
- Film Limit only to Full HD (lacking 4K)
Compare camera performance in terms of Phonearena
| Parameter | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Xiaomi Poko M7 Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Overall camera rating | 122 | 101 |
| Photography | ||
| Photo | 127 | 111 |
| Main (Wide) | 66 | 69 |
| Ultra Wide (Superior Wide) | 19 | – |
| Salafi | 25 | 24 |
| Zoom | 16 | 19 |
| Filming | ||
| Video | 117 | 90 |
| Main (Wide) | 65 | 57 |
| Ultra Wide (Superior Wide) | 16 | – |
| Salafi | 21 | 22 |
| Zoom | 15 | 11 |
Compare the Galaxy A26 with Poko M7 Peru; Conclusion
Considering the comprehensive review of the design, display, hardware, software, camera and battery sections, it can be concluded that the Samsung Galaxy A26 and Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro are each ideal for a different group of selected users. Samsung at the A26 has a special focus on construction quality, water and dust resistance, Super AMOLED display, long -term Android update and a variety of camera features; So if software stability, high resistance to environmental conditions and 4K filming are important, the Galaxy A26 will be a safer choice.
In contrast, the Xiaomi Poko M7 Pro, with a more powerful graphics processing chip, a 2 -watt charge, a 2 -megapixel selfie camera and a more complete packaging, have been able to offer high purchasing value for users looking for faster performance, better selfie photography and more features in the box. In terms of price, both phones are in the Iranian market in a nearby market (1 to 2 million USD), so the final choice will depend on your personal priorities.
21,600,000 Toman
300+ sales last week
+ 500 people have bought the product more than 5 times
500+ people are interested in this product
In the shopping cart 1000+ people
5000+ visits in the last 24 hours
22,240,000 Toman
200+ Sale Last Week
5000+ visits in the last 24 hours
Source: GSMARNA (1,2), Phonearena (1,2)
Frequently asked questions
Which phone is the most durable battery?
Both are close together, but Poko works a little better.
Which phone has the most accessories in the box?
Poko M7 Pro with frame and charger.
Which is better in terms of game and graphic power?
Poko M7 Pro with Dimensity 7025 Ultra chip.
Which phone has 4K video?
Latest Passing over countries : Spain | Dominica | United Arab Emirates
RCO NEWS
