David Sachs, the Tsalem ielligence and the White House’s crypto, considers apocalyptic predictions about the rapid access to artificial ielligence (AGI) and the widespread destruction of businesses, and emphasizes that the technology is still highly depende on human erance and supervision to deliver real value.
Technology companies’ competition to achieve comprehensive artificial ielligence (human ielligence) has reached its peak, and concerns about its consequences such as widespread unemployme and extinction have increased; However, David Sax offers a more differe and realistic narrative.
“The idea that artificial ielligence automatically improves itself and will quickly become a divine superstition is too exaggerated,” he wrote in X. According to him, companies are constaly overwhelming new versions, and models are specializing in areas such as coding or mathematics rather than becoming a whole knowledge.
US Artificial Ielligence Commes on the Future of this Technology
One of the most importa parts of Sax’s analysis was to reject the widespread destruction scenario. He argues that these predictions are exaggerated for two reasons: one: Artificial ielligence coinues to require instructions and precise human inputs to provide “meaningful commercial value”.. two: Artificial ielligence outputs need to be reviewed and approved by an humanist to ensure their accuracy and efficiency..
Accordingly, Sachs emphasizes an obvious fact: “Apocalypse predictions about losing jobs are as exaggerated as Agi. The truth is that you will not lose your job to artificial ielligence, but you will lose to someone who uses artificial ielligence better than you. “
This is not just David Sach’s view. Other promine technology people have also raised similar views; Andrew NG, a co -founder of Google Brain, believes that AGI is “overly exaggerated” and there will still be a lot of work that humans can do and are out of artificial ielligence.
Google CEO Sandar Pichai also believes with David Sachs; He prefers to use the term “artificial ielligence” to describe the curre situation: Artificial ielligence, which is extremely brillia in some areas, and in others is prone to elemeary mistakes.
