Artificial intelligence is not developed with security and state -building

While the restrictive and security view of the Internet continues and the government has focused on completing the national information network and providing services, the Majlis Research Center has recently made suggestions on the general artificial intelligence plan. Suggestions and amendments that indicate the restriction of this technology with a security and state -run view. According to the vice -president of the Tehran Artificial Intelligence Commission, the spirit of reforming the Majlis Research Center is the general design of this technology, security and focused on the withdrawal of artificial intelligence development from expert and technical rails.

In recent weeks, the Majlis Research Center has published corrective suggestions for the general artificial intelligence plan, and has found the establishment of a private fund and the development of the technology as contrary to the constitution.
The center also believes that the private sector does not need to be involved in the formulation of the country’s equipment supply guidelines. He even suggested that he be present at the Technology Council to investigate and reduce the risks of artificial intelligence, the secretary of the National Security Council.

The same has exacerbated the concerns of experts and experts over government and security for the development of artificial intelligence in the country. Mohammad Bagher Sajjadi, Vice President of the Artificial Intelligence Commission and Nasr Tehran Organization, in an interview with Digiato, explains the proposals of the Majlis Research Center on the general artificial intelligence plan:

“The center’s views for reforming the artificial intelligence plan have been influenced by the 12 -day war. However, the artificial intelligence in this war was not bold in and out and has been magnified. On the other hand, not only the enemy’s cyberattacks had nothing to do with artificial intelligence; Rather, the intensification of access to information in that war was due to the lack of proper defining and implementation of security protocols and standards. “So highlighting the security role of artificial intelligence and the restoration of this technology is completely wrong and non -expert.”

The security look at artificial intelligence also reached

Sajjadi also criticizes that the sovereignty and officials are always in the face of advanced security technologies: “When any new technology enters the country, the security label has been labeled and the rest of this technology is overlooked. This looks a major obstacle to the development of artificial intelligence. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس هم کلیات طرح هوش مصنوعی را با همین نگاه اصلاح کردند و این طرح را از حالت کارشناسی به حالت غیر کارشناسی تغییر داده است.»

He emphasizes that artificial intelligence issues should be examined in an expert and technical manner: “Even the security issues of this technology should be transferred in a group or at a request from the Supreme National Security Council. On the other hand, the National Security Council cannot examine technically and expert dimensions related to the technology, and an IT expert needs to report a report on national security after expert reviews of the artificial intelligence team or the IT team. “

Instead of having a security look at artificial intelligence, he should focus on strengthening the security of the system and communication infrastructure: “Observing security issues for artificial intelligence infrastructure or its tools is a sub -priority, and we are making it a top priority.”

Development cannot be made without the private sector

The Vice -President of the Artificial Intelligence and Data Commission of Tehran Organization, referring to the low role of the private sector in the Majlis Research Center’s amendment to the general artificial intelligence plan, says:

“Not only is the role of the private sector in the laws and structure of proposed organizations to develop artificial intelligence in the country; Rather, the role of the Majlis Research Center has been overlooked in general. However, if the goal is to develop artificial intelligence, the role and presence of the private sector should be strongly highlighted. Otherwise, this technology will not develop in the country. “As the development of artificial intelligence has been slowly slow in recent years and we are lagging behind world championships, it is currently not expected to expect the same development with such restrictive proposals and eliminating the private sector as the flagship of artificial intelligence development.”

According to Sajjadi, the expertise and concern of the Artificial Intelligence Fund should be considered. The National Organization of Artificial Intelligence specializes and can be responsible for the fund, but it is only the private sector that can be concerned about developing the technology.

He emphasizes that the performance of the Artificial Intelligence Fund should also be involved in the management structure of the technology fund along with the Artificial Intelligence Agency. On the other hand, a clear and specific mechanism for public participation in artificial intelligence development should be considered to ensure the success of the Artificial Intelligence Development Fund in a non -corruption and corruption space.