Kennedy has repeatedly referred to artificial ielligence as a solution to what calls “corruption, loss and abuse” in the federal governme. In coroversial statemes, he asked people to “trust artificial ielligence rather than trust in experts”; An approach that has been welcomed by fans of conspiracy theories and ai -violating curres, but for experts, it draws a worrying future for public health policies.
In part of the conversation, Kennedy said that using artificial ielligence to accelerate the process of drug approval in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and to abandon animal experimes. These words are not unrelated to rece changes; The FDA announced in April that it iends to gradually use artificial ielligence -based computing models instead of animal testing; The decision that is rooted in a modification of the FDA Modernization ACT 2.0.
However, experts are concerned that the Kennedy approach, which is based on the simplification of complex scieific concepts and the use of tools such as “artificial ielligence”, in fact leads to the weakening of scieific institutions, abandoning proven standards, and even the threat of public health.
One of the designs that Kennedy poied out was the use of artificial ielligence to analyze Megadita in Disease Corol Ceers (CDC); He said the technology would help the CDC to make “better ierveion decisions”. But the same seence showed how superb and ambiguous his understanding of the real uses and limitations of artificial ielligence is.
This is not the first time that technology has used technology as a means of attacking scieific institutions. He had previously been heavily criticized by the medical community and scieists with allegations of vaccines, autism and deaths caused by Kuwavid.
While the governmes of the world are trying to use artificial ielligence in accurate ethical and scieific frameworks, Kennedy is trying to ideify it as a replaceme for public confidence in scieific expertise. This “revolution”, though modern and technological, may open the way for scieific instability and serious dangers to American health policies.
