The Chinese startup recely announced that the company’s artificial ielligence models can theoretically profitable. In a post released on the X -Social network, Deepsic claimed that the company’s online services could have a 545 % profit margin, but the importa poi is that the number is based on “theoretical income”, not real income.
According to rece reports, the Chinese startup claimed that the cost -to -profit ratio could be 545 % on paper. In a more detailed post on GitHub, the company examined the details of these calculations and explained how it has achieved higher efficiency and less delay in its models. According to the report, if all the use of the V3 and R1 models were calculated at a 24 -hour range at the R1 pricing rate, Deep Sik would have earned $ 562,27. But the cost of reing the hardware required for this performance, the graphics processing units, is estimated at only $ 87,72.
Of course, Deepsic has claimed that his real income is far less than that. The reason for this difference is the discous, lower pricing for the V3 model, and the free services such as web and app access.
Of course, if the app and the website were not free and the various discous were eliminated, the use of these services would be significaly reduced; Therefore, these calculations are mostly preseed in the form of theoretical estimation of poteial profits and do not provide a detailed picture of the curre dipcice financial status.
Dip -Sick’s impact on the market and competing with Openai
These numbers have been published, with discussions about the high costs of artificial ielligence and its profitability remain. Deepsic became the ceer of global atteion when the new model was able to compete with the O1 model of Openai in some criteria, while its developme costs were far less and Chinese companies do not have access to the strongest chips available in the market due to US trade sanctions.
This led to the stocks of technology companies to fluctuate, and analysts discuss the heavy costs of developing artificial ielligence models and their return on capital.
The impact of Dipsic was not limited to Wall Street. The company’s app was able to take the ChatGPT for a short time at the list of Apple’s most popular AppStore apps, but this is not the sixth place in the productivity category after ChatGPT, Grok and Google Gemini.
Overall, although Deepsic is currely lower in real income, it has been a serious competitor for large companies in the field of artificial ielligence.
