IProov studies in the UK show that most adults are not capable of detecting dipic videos and are often influenced by them.
In rece years, thanks to the progress of artificial ielligence, the making of dipic videos has become easier and, of course, better quality. These videos are sometimes so high quality that it is very difficult to diagnose. According to the IProov research, only 4.3 perce of those studied in this study were able to detect dip -foster videos from real videos.
Dip -Ficked Video Detection is very hard
In this study, 6,000 adults in the UK and the United States were examined, and a combination of videos and images of artificial ielligence was shown. In the end, it was revealed that only 1.5 % or 5 of those who watched these coe had the power to detect dip -foster videos, and the other four failed to recognize or realize them.
The study also showed that the elderly could be very influenced by the coe of artificial ielligence. About 2 perce of people aged 5 to 5 and 5 % of people over the age of 5 had never heard of a dipfics before. The younger participas were confide in their ability to distinguish a dipica, but the results proved the opposite.
In this study, it was found that it was more difficult to detect dip -information videos than images, and participas were less likely to detect artificial ielligence video. This has raised concerns about fraud with dip -foster videos.
Social networks are currely the main source of dipline broadcasting. 5 % of the participas in the study described Instagram and Facebook as a source of dippic publishing, and 5 % cited Tik Tak.
Cybercriminals often abuse people’s inability to ideify real images of fake, and it is very difficult for most people to ideify.
