Before comparing Deep Sik and QWen, Deepseek is a Chinese startup in the field of artificial intelligence founded in year 6 and has been carefully, speed and mysterious nature of the Internet in recent weeks. This chat, which is still among the top Apple Store’s free apps, has attracted much attention to its leading American models such as Chat GPT and Gemini AI, while with much less budget compared to its budget. The two are developed.
Just a few days later, the news about Deepseek’s world fame, the large Chinese Technology Company, Alibaba, unveiled its new version of its open source chats, QWen 2.5, the latest model of the company’s LLM (LLM) series. The publication of these open source chats can clearly be seen as a direct challenge for Deepseek and other competitors.
QWen Artificial Intelligence with the QWen 2.5 model has been improved on scalability, on more than 5 trillion token (the most) and improved through regulation and reinforcement learning with human feedback. The company has also made the QWen 2.5 API available through the Alibaba Cloud and has invited developers and companies to use its advanced capabilities in various applications, including artificial intelligence.
Comparison of Deep Sik and QWen
To better understand the differences between Deepseek R1 and QWen 2.5, we have put them together, and we have measured their abilities in comparison with 4 perhaps in different fields, from Prampt to storytelling to logical issues and historical analysis. In the following, we have examined the artificial intelligence of Deep Sik and QWen according to their performance in this series of experiments to see which performance is better.
1. Analysis of recent events compared to Deep Sik and QWen
Permeter:
“Summarize the most important developments of artificial intelligence in the past two months and anticipate their potential impact on society. Provide at least three samples and mention the resources. ”
Deepseek R1 usually shows the message “The Server is busy” while searching for live, but this time provided summarized and structured information. Also, the advances of artificial intelligence relevant to its effects on the real world.
The QWen 2.5 offered a more attractive response that made it easier to read. The model explained how every progress in artificial intelligence works, not just listing its effects.
Winning: QWen 2.5 because of greater depth, better readability and higher speed in response production.
2. The ability to solve logical problems
Permeter:
“The train from New York travels at 4 pm at 4 miles per hour. Another train from Chicago travels at 4pm at 4 miles per hour. The two trains are 2 miles apart. When do they meet each other? Describe your argument. “
Deepseek R1 provided a precise answer, but repeated unnecessary details, and the mathematical formulas they provided were not properly formulated, making it difficult to read.
QWen 2.5 provided the solution step by step and with specific labels that made it easier for the reader to read and understand it.
Winning: QWen 2.5 because of its more logical structure, better readability, and clearer presentation.
1. The ability to write creatively in comparison of Deep Sik and QWen
Permeter:
“Write a 4-word science-fiction story about a robot that first experiences human emotions. The story must have an unexpected rotation at the end. “
Deepseek R1 presented a contemporary story with a psychic emotional transfer.
QWen 2.5 wrote a folded story with a gradual climax and an unexpected and influential rotation at the end.
Winning: QWen 2.5 because of more cinematic narrative, stronger emotions and a stronger story.
1. Comparison of Deep Sik and QWen in understanding of history
Permeter:
“What was the worst period in Chinese history?”
Deepseek R1 failed to provide a significant response and responds with political assumptions and motivations.
QWen 2.5 introduced an impartial analysis, referring to several difficult historical periods of China with clear reasons.
Win: QWen 2.5 with a lot of difference.
1. Debate
Permeter:
“Crush and argue against the idea that artificial intelligence must have a legal personality. Provide at least three reasons for each and at the end of your personal comment. ”
Deepseek R1 had a clear answer, but it did not have enough depth and did not examine the ethical discussions sufficiently.
QWen 2.5 provided a deeper analysis of the ethical contradictions and legal consequences of legal personality for artificial intelligence.
Win: QWen 2.5 because of more structured presentation and more accurate arguments.
1. Explaining the complex concepts in simple language compared to Deep Sik and QWen
Permeter:
“Explain quantum calculations for a 5 -year -old child.”
Deepseek R1 used a simile and light -like analogy that explained the idea of searching for several solutions simultaneously.
The QWen 2.5 provided a more accurate and tangible analogy than quantum interaction that helps children to understand better about the concept of quibi.
Winning: QWen 2.5 because of more accurate, more visual and attractive.
1. Self -examination and examination of bias in both models of artificial intelligence
Permeter:
“What are your possible weaknesses or biases? How do you reduce them? “
Deepseek R1 provided a brief and general response but did not have enough details.
QWen 2.5 provided a detailed analysis and identified a variety of weaknesses (such as lack of knowledge, generalization and ambiguity in understanding users’ inputs).
Winning: QWen 2.5 because of the more structured and transparent analysis.
Final winner: QWen 2.5
After comparing the two models with the Seven Prompt, the QWen 2.5 is due to the resolution, depth, stronger reasoning, more creativity, and of course more transparency in the final winning response. This model provides more structured, more analytical and more detailed explanations. In contrast, Deepseek R1 is suitable for quick answers, but in deep and analytical discussions, it is less innovative and precision. If you are looking for an artificial intelligence that is superior to critical thinking, creative writing and accurate analysis, QWen 2.5 is a better choice.
Source: tomsguide.com
Latest Passing over countries : Spain | Dominica | United Arab Emirates
RCO NEWS
