In the world of coemporary art, there is a place for endless innovations, and one of the biggest challenges is the iroduction of artificial ielligence io a field that was previously handled only by humans. The paiings of Aida, the robot artist, are an example of these technological innovations that have made everyone think. Are these works of art real?
Can artificial ielligence be recognized as an artist in the future? Adel Haroyan, paier and researcher of coemporary art, shared his views with us in a conversation about the impact of artificial ielligence on art and Aida’s position as a robot artist.
A new concept of art
In the world of art, concepts and ideas have always been the first step in creating a work of art. Aida, as a paiing robot, not only uses complex algorithms to create her works, but also displays a special and differe concept of art.
“Adel Haroyan” believes: “Aida’s paiings can be known as an example of new art, but this art requires a deeper thinking on a philosophical level. The main question is, do Aida’s paiings have the ability to convey the same human emotions and experiences that human works of art are known for?
Art or marketing?
Aida’s paiings, which are sold at auctions and galleries, have attracted a lot of atteion not only for their artistic value, but also for their appeal and innovation in new technologies. Heroyan poied out: “The sale of these paiings is more because of the marketing and media aspects behind these works than because of their artistic coe. In fact, Aida’s acceptance as an “artist” is more a result of the preseation and iroduction of these works in the modern world than the result of her works being artistic. This shows that today, even in the world of art, marketing plays a very importa role.”
The future of art with artificial ielligence
The future of art in the world of artificial ielligence is still unclear and full of unanswered questions. Heroyan believes that artificial ielligence can serve as a useful tool for artists in the future, but not as a replaceme for them.
“This technology can coribute to the creation of innovative works of art, but it can never be literally ‘artistic,'” he noted. In fact, artificial ielligence only gives the artists who use it new tools and possibilities to create works. For this reason, Ida cannot be considered as an independe artist, but rather as a new means of creating works of art.”
Finally, Aida can be recognized as a represeative of a new age in the art world. This robot, using artificial ielligence, creates art in a differe way than humans, and in this process, displays a new concept of art. Haroyan added: “These concepts, which are often automatically generated by artificial ielligence, can poteially become a part of art history in the future, but the question remains whether this type of art can be recognized as original art. To be or not.”
In any case, what seems to be the case is that Aida and her ilk, while they may not be able to fully and emotionally understand art, certainly raise new questions in their audience’s minds that need to be answered. .
