Iraqchi: Removing the blockade of Iranian money will be an example of US trusting steps

In an interview with Qatari media, Sayed Abbas Arakchi, the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Foreign Minister, commented on various regional and international issues, according to ISNA.

Iraqi, who spoke to Al Jazeera, said of the new US government and some statements by the Americans: “With a word that doesn’t change everything.” We have a long relationship with the United States, and unfortunately this history is full of very bad and negative events and hostility to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Since the beginning of the Islamic Revolution and since the beginning of the Islamic Republic of Iran, we have been constantly confronted with these hostilities and US movements against Iran.

He said: “You mentioned the last example that the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal was, and other things that happened, such as the testimony of Sardar Suleimani and other attacks, all of these events are a history full of hostility and most importantly full of mistrust. It created between Iran and the US. Certainly not all of this is compensated by one word.

Biden’s government had hostile stance on Iran

“We are very close to the position of the new US government,” the Iranian Foreign Minister said. The former US government also did not have a lot of good positions on Iran, but also had hostile positions. The policy of pressure on Iran and the severe sanctions on Iran in the previous US government increased. We are closely following the positions of the new government and what they adopt on Iran, Iran’s nuclear deal, or Iran’s nuclear program. We decide on their positions and coordinate our position on this basis.

The policy of pressure on Iran and the severe sanctions on Iran in the previous US government increased.

“I don’t see a basis for this at the moment, but we have to see what policies the other party is adopted and whether there will be a context for conversations.” Whether or not.

“We have already negotiated with the US government; We also conducted direct and pension negotiations, and we were able to reach an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, which was a very complex process. The whole world celebrated the agreement and said that it was a great job of diplomacy and a great success. But what happened after that? The US government decided to withdraw from the deal.

Americans can take many steps to gain Iranian trust

Iran’s high -ranking diplomat said, “I am not saying it is impossible, but it is very difficult to do so, and it depends on how Iranian trust wants Iran to trust.” To attract a constructive interaction to enter.

With one or two movements of Iran’s trust will not be granted, because we really had a very long and difficult path with the Americans after the revolution.

He further emphasized: “Difficulties are accumulated.” Many steps can take. Iranian currency blocked by the US in various places, while an agreement has been reached and Iran has fulfilled its obligations and the US government has behaved against its obligations, examples of steps that can be attracted to Iran’s trust and trust. .

The Iranian Foreign Minister stated that “I am not saying that with one or two movements of Iran’s confidence will be granted, because we really had a very long and difficult path with the Americans after the revolution. “This need to take on the US government and need to take positive steps, and I think they themselves know what steps they can take.”

The previous time we said that if the nuclear talks become a good experience, it is possible to negotiate other issues.

“We decided to negotiate with the Americans and three European countries, China and Russia in the form of a nuclear issue,” Arakchi said, “The decision was right because adding any other issue to the nuclear issue.” The more complicated and prolonged negotiations and the less likely to succeed in the negotiations led to the lesson. We had that experience and it was successful. During the previous negotiations to the US and European parties and to the international community, we have publicly and explicitly said that if the nuclear talks become a good experience, it is possible for us to negotiate and discuss other issues, but unfortunately those negotiations Did not become a good experience.

“Those negotiations were successful in reaching an agreement, but Westerners created a lot of problems in implementing that agreement, and the United States eventually left the deal,” he said. So we do not have a good experience of the previous negotiations, if this time a good experience of a negotiation, it will naturally have its own impact on Iran’s trust, and in such circumstances other steps will be imagined.

The Americans and Israelis know what goals we can target in any rape.

If we are attacked by Iran’s nuclear facilities, our reaction will be immediate and decisive

The Iranian Foreign Minister said about the military threats of the Zionist and US regime against Iran: “Iran is able to respond.” I think it will be one of the biggest historical mistakes, if the Americans do. There are a few points; First of all, Iran’s nuclear program is a program that we have been able to achieve in Iran’s own technology. This is a native program. In fact, Iran’s nuclear program is in the brain and thought (Iran), not on earth. This will not be lost through bombing or air strikes and this technology is existed. Second, Iran’s nuclear facilities are not in one or two points, scattered in many places and have a very good defense. These facilities are in places where access to them is very difficult and even impossible by air strikes.

He emphasized: “Most importantly, Iran will respond urgently, unlike the past, if Iran’s nuclear facilities are attacked, our reaction will be urgent and decisive.” Americans and Israelis know what goals we can target. In that case, my imagination is that we will enter a widespread war in the region; A catastrophe that no one in the region nor outside the region is seeking. I am unlikely to know that Americans will make such big calculations.

Nuclear weapons are not part of Iran’s military doctrine

“Our security is provided in other ways and nuclear weapons are forbidden,” said Arakchi, stressing that “Iran has no nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons are not part of Iran’s military doctrine.” The explicit fatwa of the supreme leader is that the production, maintenance and use of all the weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, is forbidden and you understand the meaning of the forbidden.

The Iranian Foreign Minister stated: Whether we have the ability to build nuclear weapons, yes there is this ability and it has been said before, but do we have the will to build nuclear weapons, not such a will and there is no intent on it now. .

Was the interference of foreign forces that brought Syria to this arena

In response to a question from Al -Jazeera’s presenter, Iran’s high -ranking diplomat said, “Mr Minister, many Syrians may have the idea that for example, your support for Bashar al -Assad was forbidden”, said: “Are you a judge or a jurisprudent who is a halal fatwa.” And do you issue forbidden? Diagnosis of solvent and forbidden is not with me and you. This is a jurisprudence that is issued.

“We can’t judge so easily about Syria,” he said of Syria. Syria has a very long story. Syria was an important part of the resistance to the Zionist regime, and the conspiracies they encountered were conspiracies designed by the Zionist regime.

We will support any government that is approved by the Syrian people.

Arakchi said, “Whether whether the Syrian government and Mr. Bashar al -Assad had mistakes or had no mistakes, he must have made mistakes, and if he had behaved in a different way, he might not have finished the work.” The Syrian people have found a lot of problems, all of which are right, but looking at Syria from the point of view of just an internal problem between the government and for example people, is a simple look. In our view, it was the involvement of the Zionists, the foreign forces and the Americans that brought Syria to the field, and their aim was to remove Syria from the resistance front and from the Palestinian support front to fight the right to the Zionist occupation.

“We will support every government, every government approved by the Syrian people,” said Iran’s senior diplomat. We consider stability and peace in Syria very important to stabilize the region. We do not want Syria to become a place for instability, for constant tensions or civil war and the war between ethnicities. This will make Syria again become a place for terrorists, and this will extend to other neighboring countries and countries in the region. Certainly, we want stability, peace and preservation of territorial integrity and non -occupation of Syrian territory by any power, especially the Zionist regime. We are opposed to the disintegration of Syria, and the preservation of Syria’s territorial sovereignty is very important to us. Finally, the formation of a widespread government that is accepted by the Syrian public is one of the things we expect from Syria. We now hope to move on to good.

The outcome of Gaza’s battle in negotiating with Hamas became clear not on the ground

“We have very good and close relationships with the Qatari government, both our bilateral relations are at a very good level and there are important projects between the two countries that are either under review or implementation,” he said. We have always had close consultations with the Qatari government on regional issues on Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Palestine. We have been and appreciated the role that Qatar played on the issue of ceasefire. My main goal in this trip was to continue the consultations with a very good partner, the Prime Minister and the Honorable Foreign Minister of Qatar. We had a long session and discussed all the issues in the region and bilateral issues. I again thanked the positive role that Qatar played in Gaza’s ceasefire. We hope the rest will be resolved and this ceasefire will continue on its own.

A victory has happened to Hamas. The Zionist enemy sought to destroy Hamas and the release of his captives, but eventually had to negotiate with the same Hamas.

“Another goal of my trip was to meet our friends at the Hamas Executive Council based in Doha,” Arakchi said. We had a very good meeting with them. I congratulated the victory of the people of Gaza. It is really a turning point in history for a nation to resist genocide, everyday bombings, and complete destruction of the land, and remain solid and sustainable on its goals. This is a greeting place. I raised this with friends in Hamas.

In the end, the Iranian Foreign Minister emphasized: “I think there is a victory for Hamas. The Zionist enemy sought to destroy Hamas and the release of his captives, but eventually had to negotiate with the same Hamas, which means the result of the battle in negotiations with Hamas became clear, not on the ground. We had great consultations. I congratulated our friends in Hamas on the part of the Iranian leadership and government and nation. The Islamic Republic of Iran is ready to help the people of Gaza and send humanitarian aid, although the path is a difficult path, but I know that the rest of the nations and Islamic countries are ready to help.

I am sure the people of Palestine will achieve their ideal

He also said about the October 7 incident: The October 7 incident had a heavy cost for the people of Palestine, Lebanon and the whole region. Resistance suffered a blow and endured important injuries. The testimony of “Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah” was not a little harm, the testimony of the rest of the commanders and the so -called Hezbollah and Hamas forces were the heavy costs that were paid, but all this does not mean the loss of resistance or even in my opinion weakening the resistance. All of these were very important experiences that came to resistance, and I’m sure they will be used in the future.

The high -ranking Iranian diplomat said: This is not the first time that Hezbollah loses its leader, when Martyr Mousavi was martyred by the Zionists, Hezbollah was very damaged but rebuilt himself and saw that Hezbollah is stronger and stronger, stronger and stronger. It has become more effective. Now I believe that the Palestinian issue is by the way. Prior to the al -Aqsa storm, everyone thought that Palestine had been forgotten, the process of normalization (Zionist relations) had begun, and the Zionists had big plans for the region, but the Palestinian and Gaza people again turned the issue of Palestine and turned into the first issue of the region and the world. Unfortunately, it was possible with a lot of blood.

“The criminal nature of the Zionist regime has now become more clear to the whole world than ever before,” Arakchi said. I think the resistance with the experiences it has gained in this field will continue to be present and influence in the region. I am more hopeful and confident today that the Palestinian people will achieve their cause.

In recent operations, you saw the impact of Iranian missiles. These missiles are in a better position given that they showed themselves in the battle scene.

Iran is an important and important actor in the area

“Any blow has its own impact, but Iran’s power is not dependent on individuals and organizations,” he said of the impact of blows to Hezbollah and the fall of the Syrian government on Iran’s regional power. First, our power comes from our people, secondly Iran’s main power is the power of discourse and resistance discourse. I believe today this discourse and the school of resistance is more alive and in the field. Our defensive power is still very strong, our reaction to any attack is still there.

“In recent operations, you saw the impact of Iranian missiles,” Arakchi said. These missiles are now in a better position given that they are in the battle scene, some of their flaws have been fixed and better settings. I think Iran is still a major player in the region, and we will continue our role in peace, stability and peace in the region.

The end of the message