“Struggle at the height of the crisis”; The dire consequences of Netanyahu’s amnesty for Tel Aviv – Mehr News Agency | RCO News Agency

According to RCO News Agency, quoted by Al Jazeera, the request for pardon by the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime, Benjamin Netanyahu, from the head of this regime, Isaac Herzog, has turned into a severe political and judicial dispute in the occupied territories, and has increased the deep gap about its implications and consequences on the current and future of the Zionist regime’s cabinet.

Some sources in the office of the head of the Zionist regime considered Netanyahu’s request to be unusual and have great consequences and stated that Herzog will examine all legal perspectives before making a decision, despite the unprecedented internal and external political pressure.

Netanyahu’s move to ask for amnesty is considered by his opponents and political analysts as a fatal blow to the credibility of the judicial system and the authority of law enforcement. They believe that Netanyahu’s amnesty means legitimizing corruption and that Netanyahu is seeking political immunity through amnesty to remain in power without accountability.

Opposition heads of the cabinet, such as Yair Lapid and Yair Golan, warned against issuing any amnesty without Netanyahu’s resignation from power and his explicit admission to the charges. On the other hand, Naftali Bennett, emphasizing that Israel is on the verge of internal collapse and civil war, called for Netanyahu’s honorable political retirement to end the crisis that the Zionists have been dealing with for years.

On the other hand, the parties in the cabinet quickly supported the amnesty request and claimed that the corruption cases against him were fabricated. The support of Yisrael Katz, the Minister of War, and Betsleil Smutrich, the Minister of Finance, were two of these supports.

Zionist journalist Gidy Whites, who was the first to expose the corruption cases attributed to Netanyahu, criticized the latest amnesty request, calling it a corrupt plan that is the culmination of Netanyahu’s attack on the law enforcement system.

In an article in Haaretz newspaper, Whites criticized Herzog and accused him of aligning with Netanyahu to escape his trial.

Whites believes that the request for amnesty shows that Netanyahu does not intend to withdraw from the political scene, but plans to “return the criminal to the scene of crime”.

According to Whites, the act of asking for amnesty goes beyond the legal and political dispute, because it reveals the depth of the crisis in the political system of the Zionist regime and reflects an unprecedented level of internal division. Also, this action shows the dangerous use of the amnesty tool with the aim of weakening the rule of law and establishing the culture of corruption in the political life of Zionists.

Moran Azoulay, the political correspondent of “Yedyot Aharonot” newspaper, wrote in another report that the amnesty request, despite initial preparations and coordination with US President Donald Trump, caused a wide shock in the judicial and political systems of the Zionist regime.

According to this Zionist analyst, Netanyahu is asking for a full acquittal without admitting to the charges and expressing remorse and even resigning from his position, while considering the events of October 7, his competence to continue as prime minister is in an aura of uncertainty.

Azoulay adds that if Herzog accepts the request, Netanyahu will gain the greatest influence in his battle with the judiciary. But if the request is rejected, Netanyahu will return to his usual position and the upcoming elections will be more tense than expected.

In the end, Olai emphasized that the Zionist regime is at a crucial moment, because this issue is not just a corruption case, but a struggle over the identity and future of the political system and the extent of the rule of law against the influence of politicians.