Lebanese government under the pressure of embassies; Hezbollah disarmament cannot be executed – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International groupElnaz Rahmatine: Hezbollah’s disarmament decision is not a national decision in Lebanon, but the US and Saudi Arabia are making and following it. According to Lebanese experts, Joseph Aoun, Nawaf Salam, and a group of political and media mercenaries are US leverage for the project. Hezbollah’s disarmament decision due to the withdrawal of Shiite ministers from the cabinet meeting does not have a consensus; For this reason, it cannot be executed and will not be implemented.

Hezbollah weapons protect not only Lebanon but Iran, Palestine and even the whole region from the occupation of the Zionist regime. In fact, Lebanon is the center of gravity of regional themes. In this regard, the International Summit of Hezbollah and the Future of Lebanon was held by Mehr News Agency with Iranian, Yemeni and Lebanese experts.

Ahmad Khalechian, a former Iranian ambassador to Lebanon and Jordan, Mohammad Khajavi, Director of Lebanese Studies Department of the Middle East Strategic Research Institute, Mohammad Ali Hassan Nia, an expert on Arab world affairs, Mohammad Sarrafi, editor -in -chief of Tehran Times, Mohammad Reza Moradi, Director General of International and Foreign News. Iranian experts in person and foreign experts online and online examined the decision to disarm Hezbollah and the future of Lebanon. Detailed It is reported below

Hezbollah’s disarmament is a violation of Taif’s laws

Mohammad Reza Moradi He said the Lebanese cabinet has raised the issue of Hezbollah’s disarmament plan that experts believe that this is like a double -edged sword that could target Lebanon’s internal security and stability. Speaking of Hezbollah’s disarmament as the only Shiite support tool and weapon, if five points from southern Lebanon are still occupied by the Zionist regime and the Shiites are attacked by the occupiers. Sheikh Naeem Qassim also said in a recent speech that “we will fight Karbala and is the weapon of our red line resistance.” Sheikh Naim threatened the Lebanese government with the danger of civil war.

“Experts are concerned about security and stability in Lebanon,” he said. Disruption of Lebanon can extend to other areas. Hezbollah’s weapon has been created to fight the occupation. Hezbollah has stated that Hezbollah’s weapon should not be discussed as long as there is an occupation. Any talk about the monopoly of the government should have a comprehensive defense strategy. Hezbollah’s unilateral disarmament by the government is violating the laws of Taif.

See the regional issues through the national interest.

Mohammad Surfi As the opening speaker, he said: “The public opinion of the community is weak about the issues of the region.” Such specialized meetings that we have held today and we are present can have two aspects; The first is that those public opinion of the community seeking more accurate and smaller information than the region’s issues can hear these issues from the language of experts. Audiences beyond public opinion, those who are decision makers can benefit from such specialized meetings, and this is the second aspect.

He added: “Specialized meetings held on regional issues are courage and courage.” Topics and issues are discussed that are less addressed and heard in the media. The decision makers and decision makers at these meetings can hear issues with different angles of different languages ​​in order to make their decision -making effective.

According to him, the issue of Hezbollah disarmament is also the issue of Iran, not only because of the support that the Islamic Republic of Iran has of Hezbollah but the Middle East and West Asian issues are strongly joined; This continuity increased after October 5 and the Operation of the Al -Aqsa Storm. What happens in Lebanon affects Iran’s national security. It is important to know the issues of the national interests of the national interest in our own interests.

The decline of the old order and the formation of the new order

Ahmad Dastlichian We need to explain the conditions of the region and the world in the current critical situation. He said: The root of the developments must be examined deeply so that the analytical and strategic error does not occur. Discourse and promotion of knowledge in Iran will enhance people’s intellectual security and peace.

“We are in the transition,” he said. The result of this period will be the gradual decline of the old order and the formation of a new order. What happened five years ago is still happening again. The two essential and decisive axes in the region stand in front of each other. On one side of the triangle and the other side of Iran and the axis of resistance.

Both sides talk about the survival war, the war of self -determination, and the existential war. These indicate that this war is a decisive war. The events that happen inside this puzzle are like chains together; If the two -day imposed war takes place, it is related to the disarmament of Hezbollah. If they raise Hezbollah disarmament and push the Iraqi branch of Iraq, they will return to Syria. Frankly, there is no such view at the macro level. The strategic necessity requires that the decision makers of the Islamic Republic of Iran should be more aware of the origins and depths of the regional developments.

The former Iranian ambassador to Lebanon said: “The issue of Hezbollah disarmament is not a new issue.” The arrogant axis has always been an eye on Hezbollah’s weapon and has been looking for it; From the first day Hezbollah fought against the occupiers to this day. The Arab, US, and Zionist unions have been constantly aligned to disarm Hezbollah. Just as they were strategic in the Zionist invasion of Iran and the overthrow of its system, they are also strategic in the disarmament of Hezbollah. Hezbollah weapon is an honor weapon. Resistance in Lebanon consists of all the tribes and its sex is popular.

“Everything happens in Lebanon we see reflection in the area,” Handmade added. Lebanon’s stability is the stability of the region. If Lebanon becomes unstable, the region will also become unstable. Hezbollah’s weapon is not parallel to the Lebanese army but a complement to it. Hezbollah’s weapon has been used in defense of the homeland and has come to the aid of the army. The army has never been able to do anything without Hezbollah’s weapon. The army system is a classic system around the world and has a resistance to a non -asymmetric strategy. How can the resistance system be digested in the heart of the army? The basis of this theory is of the wrong root.

The former Iranian ambassador to Jordan emphasized: The leaders of the Arab states know that the weapon of resistance to the Zionist regime has a deterrent to the entire Islamic Ummah. If this weapon is taken away from Hezbollah, the first countries that will not be protected from the development and crimes of the Zionist regime are themselves. The leaders of the Arab countries have no confidence in the Zionist regime and acknowledge this at private meetings.

The Hezbollah disarmament plan is not capable

Mohammad Khajavi Hezbollah’s weapon is the product of sterile output in the Middle East and specifically in Lebanon and Syria. In a sense, Hezbollah’s weapon is a reflection of a bankrupt government in Lebanon. When a country is attacked by a foreign enemy, there is virtually no army to face this enemy. Thus, people will take up weapons to defend their lives and their property. This coincides with the victory of the Islamic Revolution, turning to fattening and becoming an organization.

He added: “Hezbollah’s opposition’s argument is quite logical.” In every state and country weapon must be at the disposal of the army. There is no controversy in this matter. For Iran, it is not acceptable to have weapons outside the government government. The question arises as to the government that is formed and secure, has it been able to prove its efficiency and ability that now tells people to put aside the weapon and am I responsible for defending you? The experience of the last four decades in Lebanon proves the opposite. At various times, whether the fight against the Zionist regime or the fight against the Takfiri groups, the official Lebanese forces, including the army, have not had an effective role. If there was a place and they have done something, it was completely in coordination with Hezbollah; For example, the liberation of eastern Lebanon from the presence of ISIS. The Lebanese army failed to prove its ability to defend the people.

The head of the Lebanese Studies Department of the Middle East Institute for Strategic Research said that the Lebanese army is not independent, adding that the Lebanese army is completely 100 % under the umbrella of the United States. The smallest weapon to buy must be approved by the United States. Is not allowed to buy weapons outside the United States decisions. However, Americans are humiliating weapons to the Lebanese army; They bring two helicopters, the ribbon closes it, and they say we gave you two helicopters.

Khajavi added: “The monopoly of weapons is not in the hands of the government, but the plan” Destroying Hezbollah weapons “. If Hezbollah weapon is to be given to the army, the balance of the region will be lost. These conditions and plans have been created to consolidate the new Zionist regime’s security equation. The Zionists have freedom in the aerospace. The Americans will not even allow the Lebanese army to have Hezbollah weapons.

According to the director of the Lebanese Studies Group, the Institute of Strategic Research in the Middle East is the great assassinations and events. If the assassination of Pierre Al -Jamil, the eighth President of Lebanon, was the end of the Christian authority and the assassination of Comrade Hariri at the end of the Sunni authority in Lebanon, the assassination of Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah could be the end of the Lebanese Shiite authority. Lebanon’s political space has entered a new era.

The disarmament plan began after 1. The country had been released, and groups believed that there was no need for Hezbollah weapon. Hezbollah also justified that the whole country was not released first and that parts of Lebanon are occupied by the Zionist regime. Secondly, Hezbollah’s weapon can have a deterrent. The disarmament case reached its peak. At that time, due to Hezbollah’s power, the issue was not raised with the literature of “Hezbollah disarmament” but was called “national defense strategy”. The national defense strategy presented during the presidency of Michel Suleiman is a good way out of the current situation. Under the plan, Hezbollah was not disarmed, but the ability to resist had to be coordinated with government decisions. He also decided to war and peace to the government. The project was not implemented for various reasons, and Hezbollah was not under the burden of the plan from 1 and 2, which was very powerful and its peak was on the basis of the plan; However, the national defense strategy was politically approved by Hezbollah.

He said that the Hezbollah disarmament plan has three national, tribal and regional dimensions in Lebanon, stressing that today’s Hezbollah disarmament plan is the product of changing political conditions in Lebanon. Hezbollah opponents have seized this opportunity and, given the US government’s pressure, are trying to implement the plan in parallel with the dissolution plan of the branches in Iraq. The political order in Lebanon is completely American order. Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam came to power with the pressure of the Americans and were basically elected to implement the complex disarmament project.

“Hezbollah used the justification for disarmament that it was my weapon that created a deterrent to the country, but the recent war, which was accompanied by false calculations by Hezzullah, violated Lebanon’s deterrence and led to the deterrent power,” he said. Hezbollah and Lebanon returned to at least two decades ago; Southern Lebanon is re -occupied and the Zionist regime is superior. Basil, a supporter of the resistance weapon, says the recent war proved that the weapon of resistance did not have much deterrence. Naturally, in the current situation where the army is unable to expel the occupiers from southern Lebanon, destroying Hezbollah’s ability to get rid of itself.

He added: “Hezbollah disarm, apart from the national and power as a Lebanon, has a tribal aspect.” The root of this weapon goes back to the Shiite clan. The Shiites were geographically at the borders of the Zionist regime. From the east, they were on the borders with Syria and the Takfiris attacks. For the Shiites, the disarmament means defense of the Shiites as a tribe against the foreign enemy. Khajavi added: The Lebanese disarmament plan is not capable of implementation. Its implementation will mean a civil war in Lebanon. The Zionist regime, who has not yet given theoretical theoretical plan, is questioning the whole plan.

Hezbollah is the center of gravity of Iran’s regional issues

Mohammad Ali Hassan Nia He said: The atmosphere of Lebanon was a ethnic atmosphere before the victory of the Islamic Revolution, year 2. There was a colorful tribal in Lebanon. For this reason, the Shiites were alone in Lebanon before the year. Even the Shiites did not have birth certificates. Many Shiite women lived as a servant in Christian and Sunni houses. After Imam Musa Sadr’s arrival in Lebanon, the war and the victory of the Islamic Revolution of the Shiites restore themselves. The Islamic Republic of Iran and sometimes Hafiz al -Assad also come to the aid of Lebanese Shiites. What happens to Maron Christians after the formation of their failure government lose their power, and the Dorses and the Shiites are opening their own. Hezbollah uses one of the clauses of Taif’s agreement and holds his weapon, and in the agreement without the word resistance, “as long as the Zionist enemy is inside the occupied territories, it is legitimate.”

He added: “After the fall of Bashar al -Assad in Syria, the balance in Lebanon was broken. When the Taif agreement took place, even the Shiites, including Nabih Barry and Jordat, are opposed. At the request of the Saudi king, Hafiz al -Assad is called to Damascus and agrees after the meeting in Damascus. The Zionists in the recent war after Shams’ Magdalen came to the conclusion that they were changing their strategy to create a change in the security equation in Lebanon. The Americans also entered the change of political equation.

“Hezbollah’s disarmament will not be easy,” said the Arab world’s affairs expert. Hezbollah has a rocket and drone. The implementation of the disarmament plan is in a state of uncertainty. Even if Hezbollah delivers the army, the army is not capable of using them. The Lebanese army has been the only American -style weapon since the year to date, with two helicopters in general. The Lebanese army has no tanks, fighters and drones. Enemies are trying to drive Hezbollah weapons to the destruction, not to provide the Lebanese army.

Hassan Nia said: The scenario written by the Americans and the Saudis for Lebanon is not first implemented. Secondly, Lebanon is like a pizza and a piece of cake. It has been the basis of the acting field of regional and trans -regional countries; Iran, Saudi Arabia, France, the United States and the Zionist regime. It was also Syria who, in fact, after the fall of Bashar al -Assad’s government, led by the Lebanese acting. Qatar has sometimes had acts as in year 2. Therefore, the demands of regional and trans -regional countries are important in Lebanon. Nawaf Salam and Joseph Aoun told Mr Larijani on his visit to the country not to interfere. These people talk about the disarmament and national issues of Lebanon during the trips of Tom Barack and Yazid Yen Farhan.

He added: “There is agreement and disagreement in the Shiite community.” It is not possible to bypass different Shiite, Sunni and Christian clans. It is written in the national covenant and the Taif agreement that the clans in Lebanon cannot be scattered. Hezbollah went to the occupied Palestinian border in year 6 and captured and killed several Zionists. It was during the Shiite and Christian course that Hezbollah went to do it to release Lebanese prisoners. Hezbollah went to release the tomb of branches and Kafsua. Hezbollah’s work was a Lebanese work.

The Arab world’s expert said: Hezbollah is not an organization but an overnight state; It has a bank, manpower, weapons, media, businessmen, ships and even a dedicated terminal. The US and the Zionist regime seek to hit the Hezbollah quasi -government. The Zionist regime was targeted in the recent war of the Hezbollah Load Al -Hassanah Institute. It was targeted that Hezbollah could no longer give the southern people to rebuild money. Mr. Nawaf has put Hezbollah banking centers on the terrorist list. Hezbollah in Lebanon is the center of gravity of Iran’s regional issues. Hezbollah is Lebanon who goes to Yemen and takes their training. Hezbollah is Lebanon who sends his field commanders to Iraq at the time of ISIL’s invasion of Iraq and returned the game in Baghdad within four hours. Hezbollah is Lebanon who goes to Syria in year 6 and changes the sheet in their favor.

Hezbollah will not leave your weapon

Ali Ahmad “The current Lebanese government is completely dominated by American domination,” said the current Lebanese government believes in resistance and that the occupation will remain in the country. Joseph Aoun is trying to pursue all US projects against the disarmament of resistance. The government believes that after the year and the Taif agreement, the Lebanese weapons disruption have emerged as a result of the failure to end non -governmental weapons in Lebanon.

He added: The recent war, the Gaza support war, which Hezbollah’s Islamic resistance entered into was, was a severe and difficult war. Lebanese resistance, despite the Zionist regime’s warnings and their more than five -year efforts to widespread influence in Hezbollah, came to the war, but it failed to achieve its strategic goals. Although the Zionists martyred Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary general of Hezbollah and senior commanders of the resistance, failed to destroy the resistance and Hezbollah in the country. Despite all the blows by the occupiers on the resistance, the elements of resistance in the border areas fought the occupiers and prevented the occupation of the five army of the Quds occupation army inside Lebanon. In this situation, the war ended and the ceasefire agreement was reached. The Zionist regime did not adhere to the obligations stated in this agreement. The occupiers caused the most devastation in the southern part of Lebanon and the south of the Litani River.

The Lebanese political researcher said: “Today, after months of government activities, Hezbollah’s disarmament has been determined based on specific US and Saudi guidelines.” The messengers of the two countries made a lot of effort in this area. Saudi Arabia has shown more effort and this is remarkable. Saudi Arabia is said to have a civil war in Lebanon if the decision is implemented. Saudi Arabia has responded that the civil war is not important but the disarmament of Hezbollah is important. US envoy to Lebanon Tom Barack also plans to complete the project.

According to Ali Ahmad, the options and decisions of the resistance are quite clear; As long as the Zionist regime’s aggression and development in Lebanon exists, Lebanon’s resistance will not abandon its weapon under any circumstances. Hezbollah is ready to talk about Lebanon’s defense strategy. How to protect Lebanon against threats? How to use all the leverage to defend Lebanon? It doesn’t matter if this lever is under the supervision of the army or any other organization. Hezbollah believes that Lebanon must be protected from the rapes and ambitions of the Zionist regime and the brutality of this regime.

This protection requires power, and to realize this power, if there are forces and efforts in Lebanon, it can lead to the creation of a “national defense strategy” that maintains Lebanon under its flag. In this case, the resistance is ready to serve all the leverage of this defense strategy.

But if Hezbollah is to deliver its weapon without examining and searching for a defensive strategy from Lebanon, the people of South Lebanon will be left without protection against Zionist aggression, there will be no opportunity to defend Lebanon against the rape of the Zionist regime, and to support the army or to equip the army. However, the Zionist regime does not undergo its commitments and has repeatedly stated that it will not withdraw from Lebanon.

The Americans have also stated that there is no guarantee. The US envoy has said that we cannot give you guarantees that the Zionist regime will withdraw from Lebanon. In such circumstances, it is not acceptable anywhere in the world for a wise man to land his weapon at the request of the Zionists.

In the end, Lebanese political researcher emphasized: Lebanese resistance does not want to give concessions to the United States and the Zionist regime that they were unable to achieve in the war process. If they want to enter the field again, the resistance is ready. The only way that the Lebanese government has to take action is to abandon this resolution and conduct a dialogue to realize Lebanon’s defense strategies.

Hezbollah weapon is the weapon of honor and the Islamic Ummah

Ahmad Abdul Wahab al -Shami Referring to verse 2 of Surah Al -Mubarak Nisa’a “Vedi al -Zazini Kafrava Levi Taghfaluni al -Sallahi, and the Prophet (pbuh).” He said the enemy is waiting for us to be weapons to attack. This is about the event of Hezbollah; The enemy wants to capture the weapon of resistance in Lebanon. Behind this is the US and the Zionist regime. The enemy seeks to weaken the Lebanese resistance to dominate this country and the region. It was Hezbollah’s weapon that released southern Lebanon in year 6. It was Hezbollah’s weapon that stood in front of the Zionist army in year 6. Hezbollah disarmament is not specific to Hezbollah’s weapon, but they seek to clear the Palestinian issue. With Hezbollah disarmament, they want to prepare the ground for the dangerous “Great Israel” project.

“The US and the Zionist regime have no problem with the weapons they have,” said the Yemeni expert, “the Iranians are targeting the weapons in Gaza, who have targeted the Iranians, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon, but they have problems with the weapons that are in the hands of the freedmen.” It is the weapon of the freedom that creates security. The enemy is afraid of this weapon and prevents its domination. The weapon of resistance is not just a war tool but a red line. If it is dismantled, the enemy will advance and if it stays, it will have deterrence. The issue of Hezbollah weapons means the future of Lebanon, Palestine and even the whole region. Yemen believes Hezbollah’s weapon is the weapon of the ummah of Islam. The weapon is honorable. Hezbollah retained the honor of the Ummah in 1 and 2. All the Islamic Ummah has a duty to support and defend Hezbollah weapons.

Hezbollah’s disarmament decision is not internal decision

Zainab Farah He said the current Lebanese government’s decision to disarm Hezbollah is not an internal decision but an American decision. Joseph Aoun, Nawaf of Salam and a group of media and political mercenaries, are the US to implement a Hezbollah disarmament project. US envoy Tom Barack has clearly announced that if Lebanon fails to operate the project, it will join the Sham (Jabhat al -Nusra).

He added: “The country that proposes Hezbollah’s disarmament is America.” Lebanon’s sovereignty is not the decision maker, but the US plays a role with direct pressure from Saudi Arabia. Yazid ibn Farhan, a Saudi envoy to Lebanon, is specifically seduced in this field. The Hezbollah disarmament project, actually an American project, is in line with the new Middle East project.

Lebanese Naba Network Expert said: Resistance disarmament plan is not a consensus due to the departure of Shiite ministers from the cabinet meeting. The general charter in Lebanon was imposed on the context of power division, which has been established since year 6, based on Taif’s agreement that ended the civil war in the country. The charter emphasizes Lebanon’s right to take the necessary measures to liberate the entire territory of this country and expand its sovereignty over it.

Zainab Farah said: “Hezbollah has decisively expressed his decisive position on disarmament.” Civil disobedience, the use of cabinet, the overthrow of the government and the halt to parliamentary elections are among the scenarios that may be achieved. If Hezbollah is threatened by any political process, it is ready to defend itself. Of course, Hezbollah is opposed to any civil war and the party’s weapon is the only Zionist enemy.