The risks of “charioters” for Tel Aviv; Increasing the gap between Zionists – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

The Zionist regime’s army announced the launch of a major military operation in the Gaza Strip, “Gaddon Chariot”, saying that its aim was to achieve the goals set in the Gaza war, especially the liberation of captives and the destruction of the Hamas movement.

Profound contradiction in the plan of the chariots and its goals

But the plan of the operation is still in a state of uncertainty, and none of its stated goals have been met to date. In fact, evaluating the situation by the Center for Homeland Security Studies at the University of Tel Aviv shows the obvious contradictions between the regime’s military resources and its political authorities on the plan of the Gaddon chariot.

According to reports by researchers and analysts at the Center for Internal Security Studies at the University of Tel Aviv, it is unclear that there is a real intention to implement all the steps of the Gaddon Chariot project. In fact, some signs suggest that part of what has been announced about the plan of the chariots may be a tool for pressure on Hamas; Without this plan really implemented.

Zionist analysts are skeptical of the possibility of completing the Gaddon chariot plan at all stages, stressing that there are many differences between the army and the cabinet about the plan, and each political and military party has their own calculations and interests about magnifying or neglecting the success of the chariot.

The analysts believe that the aforementioned contradictions indicate a real consensus on the option of military decision or to achieve absolute victory in the Gaza war. In addition, there are widespread internal disputes between the General Staff of the Army, headed by the State Zamir and the Cabinet, headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, about the feasibility of continuing military operations in Gaza or to reach an exchanger and ceasefire agreement to guarantee the return of captives.

Despite the many uncertainties about the Zionist political and military disputes about the Zionist political and military schemes, some of the regime’s statements raise concerns about the intentions that may be violating international law, and potentially to prosecute the law.

Dangerous consequences of Zionists for Zionists

According to a report prepared by Shawarit Baruch, the director of the Zionist Regime’s Research Program in the World and Tommy Connor, coordinator of the Law and Internal Security Program at the Regime’s Institute of Homeland Security Studies, the Gaddon Chariot Plan raises numerous questions about the actual goals and its commitment to international law.

According to the report, the Gaddon chariot scheme includes the evacuation of about 5 % of the Gaza population to the south of this bear by creating humanitarian areas, run by private companies under Zionist military supervision.

Sharwit Baruch says the Tel Aviv project lacks basic guarantees needed by international law, such as providing vital needs and ensuring the safe return of refugees. There is also a danger that temporary evacuation leads to the systematic Palestinian displacement that falls within the framework of crime against humanity or even racial cleansing.

The Zionist researcher emphasized that Tel Aviv’s intention to exercise long -term operational control over Gaza reflects its legal responsibilities as an occupation side such as food, health and basic services for the Palestinians. However, Tel Aviv is either unable to or wants to fulfill these obligations. The growing international isolation of Tel Aviv, even by its allies, is a strategic threat, and the current cabinet’s extremist positions are damaging to its position.

Tommy Conner, another researcher at the Zionist Regime’s Internal Security Studies, said in turn: “In the wake of the increased pressure by the International Criminal Court and the reduction of international support for Tel Aviv, we are facing a major problem; How to fight an organization such as Hamas within the framework of international law without committing crimes that will harass our authorities and forces in international communities in the future.

He added that although the Gaddon chariot plan has outlined clear goals such as the release of captives and the destruction of Hamas, the contradictory statements between the political and military categories and the ambiguity of the implementation stages of the implementation raise concern about these operations and its consequences. In the wake of the contradictory statements and ambiguities that exist, the military must draw clear lines between military planning and political guidelines and adhere to international law.

The Zionist researcher said the chariots include a military maneuver to end Hamas’s life in Gaza and expand the control of the army on the strap along with a assistance plan through relief centers. But there are probably hidden goals such as imposing displacement on Gaza residents and preventing them from returning to the plan, which is a violation of international law.

The turbulent stage of the occupiers

Meanwhile, Amous Harilel, a prominent Zionist military analyst in the Hebrew Haaretz newspaper, said Netanyahu and his team seek to identify officials in Gaza. The misleading measures, accompanied by these efforts, are aimed at diverting public attention from the accumulated failures of Tel Aviv’s policy, especially in the management of war and captives.

Harilel said there were many differences between the chief of staff of the army and the cabinet recently, and after he did not want to take responsibility for results that were not merely the military, there were increasing tensions between Tel Aviv’s military and political ranks.

In the end, Harilel emphasized that these disputes are expected to intensify in the wake of the growing political and economic crisis and in the wake of the threat of extremist parties to withdraw from the Netanyahu coalition due to disagreement with the law of exemption from the Haridi exemption from the service, and all of this would change the point of view.