Influencers that support US agreement with Iran

According to RCO News Agency, Ben Armbrosts, editor -in -chief of the Rispanibele Stit Kraft analytics base, Queen’s Thought, reports on internal opposition to Donald Trump’s approach to resolving the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, written by Neokans and their allies in the Nonokan and their allies. Its nuclear is raised, but there is really no reason for Trump to pay attention to them or take them seriously.

The analytical report, referring to the recent Republican Congress letter to the US President and calling for any agreement that does not include Iran’s nuclear program, said: “Andrew Dei, a senior secretary of the American Conzroto Analytical Base, says” all Republican senators have been appointed by the Republican. It is Iran. “They know that this request is unacceptable for the Iranian government, and they are hoping to sabotage Trump’s diplomatic efforts.”

Sina Tusi, an expert in the International Politics School, described the letter as “negotiation trap”.

“The request for zero enrichment, permanent restrictions and complete dismantle of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure after the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal is not the stance of negotiations,” he said.

The ideas of the anti -agreement coalition with Iran do not want outside Washington and Israel

The other opponents of the agreement say Iran can maintain its peaceful nuclear program for the goals of nuclear energy production by not enriching its uranium. The good News for Trump and the rest of those who see the negotiations as an opportunity to limit Iran’s nuclear program and avoid war is that the anti -agreement with Iran outside Washington and the occupied territories does not want to ignore their request by the US president or at least a political cost.

For example, a recent poll in collaboration with the University of Maryland has shown that most Americans prefer a 5 % “agreement with Iran to limit its nuclear program to peaceful goals with stubborn surveys” to military action. But perhaps most importantly, the 5 percent of Trump’s representatives agreed with the idea.

Opponents of diplomacy with Iran are trying to disrupt this fact and complicate the situation. For example, Zionist Lobby CEO Mark de Bowitz, a “Defense Defense Foundation, who has been trying to change Iran for about two decades, conducted a poll last week showing” 5 % of Americans believe that Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities should be destroyed. “

However, here we find that Iran does not have atomic weapons or nuclear weapons program, and therefore does not have a nuclear weapons, it is a fact that the American intelligence community has acknowledged in its numerous reports.

Support for agreement with Iran

Armbrusters wrote: Only the American people or the Republican Party do not support Trump’s agreement with Iran, but some of the prominent figures of the Maga movement with the slogan “First America” ​​and “Great to America” ​​are also supported.

Trump’s senior adviser Steve Benn, who is now supporters and close to him, described the support of the US agreement with Iran as “rational”.

In addition, Marjari Taylor Green, who has a significant influence on Trump’s supporters’ base, has recently taken a strong stand against the war with Iran. “There is no gap between the supporters’ base and the president,” he said. “The gap between Congress and the Conservative Republicans is on the agenda of the president.”

Tucker Carlson, a prominent conservative media figure, like Bennin, has a close relationship with Trump and influenced by Trump’s supporters, has criticized Neok and others who want to destroy Trump’s diplomacy and move toward war. “Thousands of Americans are killed,” he said last month. We lose the next war. Nothing will be more devastating for our country. Everyone is looking for a conflict with Iran, it is not an American ally, but is an enemy.

“There are people in Washington, in the Pentagon and within the government who want to attack Iran,” said Charlie Kirk. Often, they say it will be easy; Only one attack and then exit. But how many times have they been right about “fast attack and exit”? Has that happened at all?

“President Trump has significantly consolidated his power in the Republican Party and can certainly sign a good agreement with Iran without political damage,” says Brian Di. The supporters of the supporters still love him, and the conservative lawmakers and media are afraid of him. The elites also surrender to the fears of the Maga Movement.

Change the view of regional partners towards agreement with Iran

Referring to the approach of the regional countries towards Tehran-Washington negotiations, the author said: Another point that may be overlooked but as important is the change of regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, which was heavily promoted at the time of the nuclear deal in Barack Obama’s government, but now in the government.

“Gulf leaders have generally supported the negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran, because they do not want to exchange possible fires if they fail,” said Ali Vaez, an expert in the International Crisis Group expert. This support does not necessarily mean success in the negotiations, but it is a change of time.

In the final part of the report, the Calci Dionport of members of the Arms Control Association recently wrote “Zero enrichment” stance not only brought Iran out of the negotiating table, but does not require any effective agreement and does not address all parts of Iran. “The dismantling of nuclear infrastructure does not destroy the knowledge that Iran has acquired in enriching uranium.”

Iran and the United States have so far conducted four rounds of indirect talks with Oman’s mediation to address the issue of Iran’s nuclear program. The parties generally evaluated the process of these negotiations well and said that useful ideas were discussed during the conversations and that the negotiations were out of the general. According to Iran, the fourth round is set and will be confirmed after some investigations and will be announced soon.

Iranian officials have emphasized that Iran’s possession of peaceful nuclear energy and the right to enrich Iran is not negotiating, and that Iran will strongly defend its peaceful nuclear program against any aggressive action.

In the meantime, US officials, especially after the third round of negotiations, claimed that Iran, as the only nuclear country without a nuclear weapon, has no right to enrich the nuclear weapons, and that if it wants to use nuclear energy, it could import the fuel needed by its reactors from a third country.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baqaei said in a news conference on the issue of enrichment on Monday: “We are not allowed to enrich inside Iranian soil, and the United States is not in a position to issue a license on the right of a country in the prohibition treaty.” It is a conscious and distorted public opinion that every country is seeking enrichment is seeking unnecessary goals, because there are countries that do enrichment but do not have nuclear weapons.

Baqa’i reiterated that “Iran’s nuclear program is completely peaceful and the issue of enrichment is also recognized in the prohibition treaty,” Baqa’i said, “On the other hand, you cannot, while your ally in the region has no weapons of mass and nuclear killings and takes no occupation. Have to close its nuclear program. This is an irrational and illegal request.

The end of the message