British Navy claims about Yemen’s imminent attack on one of his ships

According to the British Navy, traveling near the Yemeni Ansarullah -controlled territory, they are preparing to attack one of their prizes.

The Daily Mail Online Magazine wrote: Plans have been prepared to attack Ansarullah camps with its F-5 fighters when it was attacked by HMS Prince Wales.

According to government sources, Downing Specials has also allowed the “Special Boat Service” and “Royal Marines” unit to begin rescue operations if they were shot at each fighter’s pilots and their collapse.

The Wales Prince’s HMS ship will soon cross the Bab al -Mandeb Strait, which connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, to calm down its mission in the ocean. The ship is said to carry four F-1 fighters.

Referring to the retaliatory attacks of Ansarullah Yemeni against Zionist ships and its supporters in response to the regime’s war crimes in Gaza, the Daily Mail wrote: Yemen, a militant group in the country, has carried out more than five attacks on commercial and military ships in the area.

The 6,000 -tons of the HMS prince of Wales will be protected by the HMS Dantels, which will be protected by the Type 2 destroyer, equipped with the C -Viper Air Defense System.

The Wells HMS Navy recently crossed the “Mesina Strait” between Sicily and Italy following the bombings carried out by drones and missiles in the area.

“We do not comment on operational security reasons for the route of the ship,” a spokesman for the British Ministry of Defense said.

Regarding the report, Lebanon wrote: It is increasingly revealed that those who see most of the “unstable” policies of US President Donald Trump, who prioritize his country’s interests above any other consideration, are his allies. In the wake of the uncertainty that countries such as Britain and EU member states experience how the White House deal with issues such as tariffs and Russian and Ukraine war, it was finally proven that Trump’s agreement with Ansarullah in Yemen, including Britain, would not be one of the closest US allies.

Accordingly, the agreement has put the British Royal Navy in a permanent state of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden to confront any threat to Yemen, when the British warship is due to send HMS Princess Wales to the Strait.

The ship is thought to be carrying four F-1 fighter jets. Although there is no evidence that the Yemeni armed forces invaded British assets at present, Sanaa is still in “war situation” due to London’s involvement in Yemeni territory. Therefore, it reserves “the right to punish Britain at the right time” as long as the country has not yet signed an “unilateral” agreement.

However, later, a week before the announcement of the US -Yemen deal, and a month after the second round of attacks, British planes suddenly attacked Yemeni targets. At that time, London claimed that the attack had targeted a Houthi -used drone production center, which occurred in a joint operation with Washington, the first of which on May 6. British Defense Minister John Haley also justified his interference in the aggression against Yemen, pointing out that British “ordinary” buyers “as a result of international transport disruption by Ansarullah” were confronted with “higher prices” for goods affiliated with them.

Hayley, a week before the US ceasefire, responded to a question in the House of Commons on the British confidence in current information, pointing out that the Labor Party’s government was exposed to something like a US deception and was unaware of the details of US military operations, saying “the evidence reported by the US army and the US military.

Britain’s failure to participate in Trump’s second round of talks is still questionable, especially since the move came after disclosure of disgraceful conversations between his government officials through the signal app that “anger” of US policymakers over their European allies and their demands for the European countries to pay more money.

This prompted some observers to argue that Trump deliberately decided to start unilateral operations against Yemen, according to expecting that the target bank was able to resolve the battle and destroy Ansarullah for a maximum of a month, so he wanted to take the leadership. What is even more surprising is that the British joined the air strikes, while for current and former US experts and officials revealed that the option of air strikes in achieving targets has failed.

In an attempt to explain this, the Brogen Studies Center reports that “Britain is trying to pay for Trump through Yemen, hoping to achieve tax privileges and support in Ukraine,” which means “interconnected issues and poor British economy.” In spite of the above, participation in the second round of strikes without popular and political protests within the UK. For example, Lindsi Germany, coordinator of the “stop war,” emphasized that “Yemen and the Houthis are not those who cause regional instability and endanger the economic security of families in the UK.”

He pointed out that “Starmer had committed to winning parliament before any military action before any military action.”

“We are now confronted with government disgrace (from the Labor Party) that supports the genocide in Palestine, bombing Yemen, imprisoning climatic protesters, suppressing the right to protest, and imposing more economic austerity on its citizens, all with no more intentional wars,” he said.

The end of the message