Quinness: China -Russia alliance is stronger than to break

US President Donald Trump’s unusual diplomacy has sounded alarm around the world, especially in Washington, according to ISNA. While many political elites in the United States have shocked the possibility of US foreign policy turning to Russia, some Trump administration officials have spoken of an ambitious plan to create a gap between Moscow and Beijing.

In an article, the Institute of Responsible Country Institute has described the angles and dimensions of this possible US government strategy and has considered it very difficult and even impossible.

According to the report, many political elites speak of the possibility of a maneuver called “Reverse”; The move aims to shape the balance of power in the world in the interest of America. But is it possible to do so?

In year 2, US President Richard Nixon ended a five -year break between Washington and Beijing with his historic trip to China. The basis of this diplomacy was provided years ago, and in the year 6 with bloody clashes on the China -Soviet border. The gap between the Eurasian Communist Giants opened a gateway to Nixon that helped the US interests.

Nixon’s decisive movement in chess among world powers caused a heavy blow to the Soviet Union; Since then, the Kremlin had to face powerful military blocks on its western and eastern fronts. In the 1980s, it was found that the combination of advanced American technology and the huge population and the desire to renovate the Soviet Union was deeply concerned.

But can Trump’s efforts to close to the Kremlin today make a similar change in global politics? Such a result seems unlikely, according to Quinness. Beyond the deep hostility between Washington and Moscow, there is another important factor: the widespread and solid link between China and Russia.

Some Western experts say that closeness to Russia and China is an expedient alliance and that their separation is not impossible. They point out that there are tensions in this regard, referring to environmental issues such as intense exploitation of Siberian forests for the Chinese market and disagreements in foreign policy such as how to interact with India or Vietnam. Beijing is also unhappy with the fact that Russia sells weapons to Chinese regional rivals.

In addition, China and the Soviet Union have had fierce historical clashes in the past, and many experts believe that the clear inequality of power between Moscow and Beijing can be a source of expansion of instability.

However, Beijing and Moscow have a strong relationship. “China -Russia trade has flourished in recent years and China’s vast market has allowed Russia to export to China after European sanctions,” the report said. “This has played a key role in stabilizing the Russian economy while providing cheap energy for Beijing, especially under heavy sanctions after year.”

But China’s role has not been limited to financial support and compensation for Russian consumer markets. Beijing has also supported Russia in supplying key equipment for war and logistics.

According to the American think tank, Chinese excavators have played a significant role in the construction of the Sorvoicin defense line that failed the summer attack of Ukraine to reach the Azov Sea. Also, Chinese officials and experts have always made statements in support of the Kremlin in his battle with the West.

China has refused to send deadly weapons to Russia, but has continued regular joint military exercises with Russia; Exercises that now include strategic forces and irregular forces in each of the two countries. On October 5, the China -Russian Coast Guard forces held a joint patrol near the Alaska Coast for the first time.

The North -Northern region has now become a multidimensional cooperation between China and Russia, with the interests of the two countries: China is seeking natural resources, and Russia desperately needs technical expertise to develop its “distant northern”.

It is noteworthy that China -Russia’s cooperation now occasionally includes third countries, including Iran. A Chinese academic analysis in year 4 also shows that the pressure from the “US marine hegemony” is felt simultaneously in the Black Sea and the South China Sea; An analysis that reflects the actual sharing of Beijing and Moscow’s strategic perspective.

According to the American think tank, there are many rational reasons for improving Washington -Moscow relations. First, the human necessity to end the terrible bloodshed in Ukraine is raised.

The second reason is that the best way to reduce the risk of nuclear war and to contain the dissemination of nuclear weapons is to revive the weapons control mechanisms by improving relations between the main nuclear powers, Russia and the United States.

In addition, if the Moscow -Washington relations improve, Moscow’s dependence on Beijing is likely to be reduced and reduced the likelihood of the transfer of advanced Russian military technologies – including nuclear submarines and nuclear weapons technology to Beijing.

However, Quinness has announced that due to the extensive cooperation between Russia and China, these two countries have a deep link that will not be easily discredited. This means that the success of Nixon Reverse’s strategy is in a state of uncertainty.

The end of the message