Trump’s goal is to exercise power over Iran, not negotiation

USA expert Samaneh Akwan in an interview with ISNA about the type of US President Donald Trump’s policy on Iran and some believe that he is promoting “peace with power” in the international arena, and a number of his experts. A person is considered a “unpredictable” person in politics, saying: In the way Trump’s exposure to Iran and the developments in the international arena, various theories have been put forward by experts and analysts, one of which is the theory of peace with power.

“Trump believes that the United States is the first power in the military, economic, commercial and so on, and in the world,” he said. In the same context, it should take over the leadership of the world, while the Democrats were trying to move the issue of “American leadership” on the world using elements such as multilateralism and cooperation with some countries.

The US affairs expert emphasized that “the actions taken by Trump indicate that he is looking for the US presidency” said: “In this regard, actions such as renaming some geographical places, boycotting some international institutions and sanctions. The decision to seize some land in different parts of the world pointed out.

Trump’s policy on Gaza is not based on realities on earth

Referring to the fact that “he also ordered some of his counterparts to do in the context of this policy,” Akwan said: “He claimed to be in the hands of the Americans and the Palestinians. They have to move to other places, including Jordan and Egypt, this policy of Gaza is not based on realities on earth, and if the Palestinian issue was to be resolved, the Palestinian crisis had been resolved years ago, and a stream called “resistance” had been resolved. There was no.

“Generally, for US presidents, it is very important for US presidents, and Trump has taken several steps in these few days, which has been successful in this regard, in which the decision to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico can And forcing the presidents of the two countries to shorten Trump, such actions have created a self -confidence in Trump that he thinks he can do anything.

Akwan continued: Trump has ignored the historical reality of Gaza about Gaza, although some pulses have been sent to the United States in recent times, but if it had not been for these pulses, he followed it. It is to create a stable peace in the region, which is the realization of the reduction of Iran’s regional activities, limiting Tehran’s military and nuclear activities.

Negotiating with Trump is not equal to Iran’s national interests

Emphasizing that “what Trump says is the exercise of power over Iran and this is different from the issue of negotiation, and only Trump seeks to introduce these power to negotiation,” he said. We have been an executive note to implement a maximum pressure policy on Iran, and as stated in this note, one of the main goals is that Iran’s exports in the oil field reach zero.

The US affairs expert, believing that “the policy of maximum pressure is a failed policy”, continued: “In the negotiations, the parties must have goodwill and to do it, but what Trump is looking for in Iran’s position includes. Not these components, in addition to signing an executive note to maximize pressure on Tehran, in order to impose it, he also imposed new sanctions against Iran on Thursday.

In another part of his talk, Akwan said, “The actions taken by Trump so far on Iran show that he has a positive political interaction to negotiate with Iran.” It is not, as I mentioned, the policy of exercising power on Iran, a policy that does not work according to history of history.

If there was an optimism between the general public and a series of politicians that might be negotiated with Trump, the signature of the executive note and the imposition of sanctions and rumors suggested that Iraqi sanctions are likely In the case of Iran, this optimism was lost because Tehran officials know that sitting at the negotiating table while Trump seeks to exercise power will not be an equal and in line with the national interests of the country.

The end of the message