Biden’s capstone for his son in the 90th minute

According to Isna, the American media in an article referring to the amnesty that US President Joe Biden issued to his youngest son Hunter Biden, compared this rare pardon with the Watergate scandal and the pardon of Richard Nixon and reported that This could undermine public confidence in the US justice system.

According to Politico, the presidential pardon of Biden’s son, a political move with unprecedented legal reach, would shield Hunter from accountability for any federal crimes he may have committed over the past decade. According to experts, there is only one other person in recent generations who has received such an extensive pardon from the president of the United States: Richard Nixon, the 37th president of the United States, who was pardoned in 1974 by Gerald Ford, the 38th president of the United States. .

Margaret Love, who served as a pardon attorney at the US Department of Justice from 1990 to 1997, points out that by pardoning Hunter Biden, he is immune from any possible charges that have not yet been brought against him. “Except for the Nixon pardon, I’ve never seen a tone like this in any pardon document,” says the expert. Even Trump, in his broadest pardons, specified exactly what charges were pardoned.”

Deliberate ambiguity for fear of Trump’s scrutiny

According to Politico, Joe Biden’s “full and unconditional” pardon for his son is deliberately vague. Donald Trump and his allies have long focused on Biden’s son, and Trump has repeatedly promised to investigate and prosecute members of the Biden family during his second term. Some commentators have also speculated about this issue and said that Hunter Biden may be accused of bribery, illegal lobbying or other crimes stemming from his foreign business activities and drug addiction.

So, instead of Biden pardoning his son only for the crimes he’s currently convicted of, namely gun and tax crimes, the president will pardon “all crimes against the United States that he (Hunter) has committed.” has committed or participated in committing them” from 2014 to 2024.

This literature is exactly the same as that used in Ford Nixon’s pardon. He was pardoned for “all crimes against the United States committed or likely to have been committed between January 20, 1969 and August 9, 1974.” This period actually includes all the days of Nixon’s presidency.

According to Politico, the January 1, 2014 start date for Hunter Biden’s pardon was certainly not chosen at random. Hunter Biden joined the board of directors of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings in April 2014, when his father was the vice president of the United States in the administration of Barack Obama. Republicans say Hunter illegally profited from his position on the company’s board.

According to this report, the pardon came a day after Trump announced that he would nominate Kash Patel to be the director of the FBI. Last year, when Hunter Biden appeared to be on the verge of a deal to resolve his legal woes, Patel opposed the deal, saying, “As a former federal public defender and national security prosecutor, I have to say that this case “Loneliness has damaged the institution of justice more than anything else I have seen in my life.” Hunter’s legal compromise plan ultimately failed.

Hunter’s pardon, an excuse for Trump’s “forgiveness”.

“Samuel Morrison”, a lawyer who specializes in amnesty and has served in the pardon department of the US Department of Justice for 13 years, says that Trump cannot cancel this amnesty in his administration, and the extent of this amnesty means that the Justice Department of his administration will not be able to cancel it either. Launch a long-term criminal investigation into Biden’s son. Morrison also believes that Biden’s pardon for his son is comparable only to Richard Nixon’s pardon.

Although the scale of Hunter’s pardons is almost unparalleled in modern American history, it seems in some ways similar to Donald Trump’s own practices during his first term as president.

From 2016 to 2020, Trump sometimes justified pardoning his political allies by claiming that they were “victims of unfair prosecution” in the justice system, an approach that broke the norm. According to experts, former American presidents usually did not claim in their pardons that the recipients of this amnesty were victims of injustice; Rather, they tended to emphasize that they accepted responsibility for their actions. This approach was intended to maintain public confidence in the US judicial system, but Trump has undermined it.

Trump distanced himself from these norms and Biden followed the same path by pardoning his son. She justified the pardon by arguing that her son had been unfairly “targeted”.

According to the American media, after entering the White House in January 2025, Trump will probably use the amnesty that Joe Biden issued to his son as a justification for a large amnesty for his allies. He has specifically promised to pardon all the people who were arrested for the attack on the US Congress building on January 6, 2021.

“This provides a justification for what Trump is up to,” said Morrison, a US attorney and pardon expert. He would have done it anyway; But now this amnesty gives him some kind of political cover. “I think at least some of the people associated with January 6 will be pardoned, maybe all of them.”

end of message