Can the multitude theory make us familiar with the nature of the universe?

One possibility to explain the constant nature of nature is that there is more than one world; That is, we live in a multipurpose or multinational, where each different world experiences different values ​​of the fixed. There are a few great hypothetical ideas in physics that can lead to the concept of multipurpose. Follow along with Digino.

One of these ideas is through the concept of eternal inflation, where the very elementary world has never completed its rapid expansion, and different parts of the multinationals were separated in some way to form their own bubble worlds. Another idea about the multiplicity comes from the theory of string, where extra spatial dimensions can wrap them in confusing ways. Any layout may lead to new amounts of physical constants and even new physics rules.

The widespread compounds may be recognized as a landscape in which our world consists of one point in that landscape. In these inspired ideas from the world, there are a set of worlds that are deprived of life, but one of them includes this feature and we live there. Of course, this is still the same human -based reasoning, but at least explains how different values ​​of fixed fixtures can be realized and created. According to this argument, there are a number of worlds that each have different amounts of constant, but our world includes life and we are present.

Even scientists have tried to estimate whether our world is common. These calculations have many problems, the biggest of which is that we have no idea how much the previous probability of any particular composition is. Cannot be assumed to be all the same as possible; Without this hypothesis, we will not be able to evaluate the possibilities. Therefore, all of these efforts are ultimately defeated because of this fundamental ignorance. The multidimensional perspective may be a little more satisfying than the human -centered reasoning, but not much more.

However, in addition to the ability to calculate the possibilities, there are other additional issues in both ideas. First of all, you should know that these ideas are hypothetical and there is no fixed evidence about them. We do not know how the tour works and whether eternal inflation can even occur. Field physicists cannot find the connection between a particular layout of the extra dimensions and the physics produced by it, which means that we are not even able to make testable predictions. Therefore, citing arguments based on non -supportive and superficial ideas is not the best way to advance.

In addition, eternal inflation and discipline theory have their own constants that are not examined by different multinational repetitions. For example, eternal inflation requires any number of additional and unknown parameters to work; It is assumed that inflation exists, does its job, and moves in a certain way, and its physics will be influenced by certain constants. Of course the risk theory itself has assumptions, such as a certain number of additional dimensions; A number that do not predict theory itself.

This does not seem to be a satisfying result. In any case, you will continue to encounter a number of numbers that you cannot explain through pure theory. However, this can be considered as a progress. If we can explain many of our current constants and reduce the total number of unknowns, we may feel that we are approaching a fundamental theory of physics; A theory that can give us a lot of information about everything.

However, the truth is that we may never be able to eliminate the constants. There may always be an aspect of ignorance that we cannot eliminate. Finally, no theory of physics, even as complicated, can explain its existence. So maybe this is the same limit, and we have to cope with ignorance. This, of course, is not pleasant at all, and it is what drives physicists forward, because they believe that there are more things to learn in the world.

There is, of course, divine intervention here. This is not exactly the physics that is the main center of the program. In other words, all our other ideas are catastrophic and none of the answers are very satisfying. The fixtures are really fixed, neither in space nor in time. In any way you count them, you will always have a list of numbers that are the center and the main for all our theories. There are only fixtures, without explanation. Until we can change them or make great progress in theories, we must cope with this situation.

Source: Universetoday