Dr. Behrouz Rasouli told Mehr reporter about Iran’s scientific status in terms of the number of scientific publications: Fortunately, policymakers realize that losing this position and reducing university publications is a serious issue. There have been moves at the universities to prevent this drop.
“In the first step, universities are partially increasing incentives for the publication of the article,” he said. They also use the capacity of researchers outside the university to increase the number of university publications.
In response to the question of whether the criticisms of recent years have been criticized by the Iranian Information Science and Technology Institute (Irandak), the professor of Iranian Information Science and Technology Research (Irandak) has played a role in reducing university publications and a drop in scientific rankings. Said. The researcher is in a growth system, so he looks what the evaluations are paying attention to, because he must earn these privileges anyway; Then we suddenly tell him that the article doesn’t hurt! These actions confuse the researchers.
The “article” is not eliminated from the value chain
He emphasized: I am extremely with the proposition that some say, “What does the article hurt?” Disagree; If we look at the scientific trends as a value chain, the article is part of the value chain.
This science researcher As for the value chain, he explained: In the value chain there is a series of inputs or inputs, which as a result of some activities become an output or output. They then become OutComes, and they become impact or impact.
Rasouli outlined an example: For example, we have a series of wires and lamps and we are looking to provide lighting with it. A researcher works on how the wires are connected to turn on the lamp and writes an article and prints. This article can become a patent license. One person works on this model; He adds a few tips and finally says we were able to turn on the lamp this way. This lamp must be used in practice. The lamp is the result of our work, the article and the patent, the output or our output. When the process can illuminate one person’s lamp in the most remote areas, it has been impressed or influenced. The same is the process of scientific growth and influence.
“We cannot say that I decide today to remove the article section from this process; It is as if we remove the lamp from the process and expect lighting. It has a basis and there is a need to understand this process. It should be noted that out of 5 articles, one becomes patent; Of the 5 articles, one becomes an impact. The first chain cannot be eliminated and the researchers will continue to do so.
The work of the researcher is writing
Irrandak’s faculty member noted: Researcher, research, writing and writing is read; If the industry knew, it would work in the industry. The university should not be eliminated in this process. The work that can be done in a state -owned company for billions of dollars and becomes a research may be done at the university with 2 million USD; Because it is a specialty of the University of Research.
He emphasized that removing a part of the chain is not a good job; I don’t know why some people really raise these issues, but whatever the purpose is, the result is not favorable.
(tagstotranslate) Irandak
RCO NEWS




