American Analyst: The purpose of Ukrainian UAVs is the beginning of World War I

Former US State Department diplomat and adviser Christian Vuitton wrote in an article for the Capitalist Nutz: The media coincided with the US policy faction has long been calling for a wider clash and more US entry into the Ukrainian war. They achieved their dream on Sunday, when Ukraine launched a pre -designed operation that is said to have disrupted dozens of nuclear bombers deep in Russian soil.

“Imagine an external power with Russian weapons and information destroy a significant portion of the US B-1 and B-1 fleet; What will our reaction be? Do we make peace or respond with anger? “

Vuitton believes that this disruption of deterrence is a “very restless” action and to the detriment of American interests. “According to Russian military doctrine, if the enemy acts in a way that weakens the country’s first and second nuclear blows, Moscow is allowed to use nuclear weapons pre -use,” he writes.

The following is warned that Russia’s reaction may be “much more intense than any action since World War II”. Contrary to what some American war media claim, Ukrainian President Waldimir Zelksky’s decision to carry out the attack has made it more difficult to reach a peace deal than ever, and that may have been his goal from the beginning.

The author adds that the weakening of Russia’s nuclear deterrence does not help Ukraine on the battlefield, as it is gradually defeating in a war with Russia. He considers the move politically, like Ukraine’s failed and expensive attack on the Russian Corsk area.

Although the probability of Russia’s nuclear attack against Ukraine or its supplies such as Germany and Poland is still described as “relatively low”, it is warned that “this is not zero.”

“Russia can install nuclear warheads on its new supernatural missiles, with no operational defense system yet,” the author writes. “US officials need to know that this is on the table.”

The author suspected that Zelkski is trying to pressure US President Donald Trump to resume the extensive aid of Joe Biden’s era to Kiev. In the meantime, British, German and French leaders will also support Zelnski. According to this text, German Chancellor Friedrich Merts, who is due to travel to the United States this week, has promised that Germany and the United States will provide more weapons to Ukraine to carry out deeper attacks against Russia. Vuitton predicts that Merts is set to promise $ 5 billion in new budget to boost European defense during his meeting with Trump at the White House.

The report also noted that Germany had earlier promised to consider $ 5 billion in additional military spending at the beginning of the Ukrainian war, but did not fulfill its commitment. The author of the analysis also called the new promise “fabricated” and unconscious, calling it a sign of the political and economic crisis of Berlin. He emphasizes that Germany and the European Union have always exploited the United States in the field of trade, while Washington expects to provide their military costs.

The text said that Trump said the United States was not aware of Ukraine’s intention to carry out the recent drone attack. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also made a phone call to his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov.

Vuitton goes on to conclude that there is no quick path to the end of the Ukrainian war; A war in which the vital interests of the United States are not involved. In his view, “prioritizing America” ​​in the current situation means preventing the intensification of nuclear stress and minimizing the risk of direct conflict.

From the author’s point of view, the practical solution is to allow Russia to respond strongly, while also warning Moscow that it will face complete isolation if they use nuclear weapons; Even from China.

Vuitton ultimately suggests that the United States has completely neutralized: no weapons sales or donation, no information exchange, and no direct financial payment to the parties involved in the war. According to him, the policy will put the United States in a better position for mediation or even a complete withdrawal from the crisis without conflict with Russia. “Today’s war with Russia, the wrong war, in the wrong place, in the wrong time, and the wrong enemy,” he writes.

The end of the message