Read the date correctly; Zarif Lecture, Russian Embassy Response and Reality – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International Group: In regulating Iran’s foreign relations with local, regional and between International There is only one “red line” and “protecting the country’s national interests and security” in the chaotic foreign environment. That is the case The basis of the Islamic Republic of Iran Based on The principle of “neither eastern nor western” Emphasis He has tried to pursue any of the blocks of global power by pursuing “balanced and realistic foreign policy” while defining relationships with each actress. International Seeking to maximize national interests and reduce threats against security and Territory integrity Be country. However, Iran is in the heart of the area “HartlandAs a communication intersection and the center of hydrocarbon resources, it has always been of interest to major world powers, especially the US, Britain and Russia. In this equation, the aforementioned countries sometimes held the “Tehran Conference” in the form of the Allies without the permission of the Iranian government, and sometimes their competition has become so expanded that it has become a kind of zero equation! Recently Review of Mohammad Javad Zarif’s remarks during the annual conference of the Iranian Political Science Association About The end of the long -term unity and coalitions and an example of the proposal of Russian defense cooperation to the United States in Europe has led the Russian Embassy to publish a accelerated textual approach to the Vice President of Strategic Affairs and implicitly accuse him of “lying” and “lying” and “lying”. Knowing “. But What is the reality of the story?

What is the truth?

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the two streams of the “Westernists” and shortly thereafter the “neorassianists” guided the Kremlin Palace. Busy They took. Between the ages of 1 and 2, the new Russian rulers have repeatedly tried to be accepted as part of Western civilization and even the continent of Europe so that they can Evils Economic, technology, political and security benefit from it. However, the US led by George W. Bush, and later Barack Obama, decided to bring new Russia alongside China, Iran and North Korea as countries Appeal Regime International Identify and nominate them in US national security documents as a threat to Washington and Western countries. The emergence of colored revolutions in Ukraine (Orange Revolution- 1), Georgia (Rose-1) and in the coming years to penetrate Armenia to remove Yerevan from Moscow reflects a West plan to approach the borders of the “CIS” and the siege of the new Russia. . Russian military intervention in Georgia and Ukraine can be seen as a sign of the Russians’ reaction to the approach of NATO military facilities near the historical Russian borders.

In the year 9, the Bush administration, with the help of the Israeli “security” project, sought to introduce Iran’s missile capability to nine countries in the West Asian region, but a direct threat to Berlin, Rome, Paris and even London. Beyond This psychological operation But The reality was something else. The Americans intended to approach the Russian borders by using the “collapse of the Berlin Wall” and deploy their so-called offshore-defensive weapons in the eastern continent of Europe. In year 4, Americans began negotiations with the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary to establish anti -intellectual systems. A few months later, Vladimir Putin called on Washington a security initiative to define this missile defense system against Iran, jointly between the US, Europe and Russia. The accuracy of this Narrative Can be studied by studying White House documents Confirmation Kurdish. Delicate and Reflective In this Narrative That is that the Russians did not really intend to cooperate with the United States against Iran But ThereNarrative Westernization »were forced to prevent the establishment of antimattering systems near their borders with Narrative «Anti -IranianTo accompany. In other words Russia in order to prevent Sue US use of the Wave of Iran Farry in the West takes a way than to temporarily and appearance to thwart the design Antimony It didn’t have NATO. This was permanently marginalized after the United States declared.

But About Narrative Former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and why it is published in the current situation and at the same time the type of reaction from the Russian Embassy to this Narrative There are many questions and ambiguities? Apart from internal disputes About The legality or lack of Zarif’s presence as a strategic affairs adviser to the fourteenth government seems to be not essentially “anti -Russian” during the annual conference of the Iranian Political Science Association, but on the contrary in praise of pragmatism. The The national interests have been addressed. Foreign Minister Ex – On various opportunities, Iran has defended the need to expand relations with Russia and China as part of Iran’s balanced foreign policy. However he should express some statements About Iran’s bilateral issues with Russia, especially after the illegal and suspicious release of their audio file from the network Anti -Iranian International is more accurate and allowed Sue Do not use the useful and malevolent people. On the other hand, the Russian Embassy in Iran should also be limited Around Recognize themselves and proportionate to diplomatic laws and custom About The host country’s agents declare or even complain. Repeating this error is definitely with the appropriate reaction from Tehran Encountered It will be.

The last point

Relations between Tehran-Moscow, despite today’s historical ups and downs, are at the peak of strategic coordination and cooperation. The signing of a comprehensive strategic agreement between Iran and Russia during Massoud medical visit to Russia can be seen as the beginning of the new season in the relations of these two powers. In the new era, the Russians must know that the Iranian government is of great value to Development Cooperate with his northern neighbor But Interference in Iranian internal affairs or insulting agents Ex – Or the current system is a crossing of the “red line” that can break the wall of trust between the two countries and become “cynicism” and “mistrust”.