Interpretation of Trump’s claim about the occupation of Gaza

According to RCO News Agency, US media, referring to recent statements by US President Donald Trump during a meeting with Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, examined his claims of the possibility of occupying the Gaza Strip by US troops.

There are four ways to interpret Trump’s unprecedented, shocking and unexpected statements on Tuesday evening, according to the Alexius News Agency. The first is that these statements were actually a baseless bluff or rhetoric to obtain pressure leverage in the Middle East, a similar idea to his business threats to Canada and Mexico. Many Republicans know this interpretation right.

Another impression is that these statements are a combination of Trump’s old tendencies, his desire to a great peace agreement in West Asia, his belief that Gaza would be like “hell” for decades, and his true desire to develop attractive coastal lands. And the luxury in this slot. US officials say Trump’s remarks were pre -planned during a meeting with Netanyahu, and in his private conversations with some White House staff and his family members.

At the same time, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has recently introduced the idea of ​​capturing the Gaza Strip and shared it with some of its close advisers, even the authorities responsible for preparing his meeting with Netanyahu. They didn’t know about this plan.

Authorities who are not in the circle near Trump were unaware of the plan, and the decision even surprised some of his most ardent supporters in the Zionist regime’s supporters, according to the Wall Street Journal.

“The United States will seize the Gaza Strip,” Trump said at the first news conference of his presidential term in the eastern room of the White House. “We will own it and take responsibility for clearing the bombs and unpublished weapons.”

When asked who was going to live after the rebuilding of Gaza, he replied, “I think all the people of the world will live there, the people of the world. We can turn it into an international and unbelievable place. We have an opportunity that can be great. I don’t want to joke or rhetoric … but here it can be amazing. We do make this project implemented globally. “

Although Trump expresses his remarks firmly, his views and motivations on Gaza are in the shadow of ambiguity, like many of his policies, according to Alexius. “This time he is moving the borders of madness,” a veteran consultant Trump told Axius. “He is no longer afraid of media headlines or political experts and raises whatever he wants.”

Trump’s adviser told the US media that Trump plans to send a message to West Asia, and the message is: “I can make things worse for you; Unless you provide a better design. ”

However, the US media acknowledges that Trump’s outlook for this slot is facing enormous obstacles. 5 million Palestinian citizens live in Gaza and, despite the devastation of the last six months of the war, refuse to leave their land. On the other hand, Egyptian and Jordanian leaders have also decisively rejected Trump’s proposal for Palestinian accommodation. In addition, countries in the region, especially Saudi Arabia, insist that Gaza should be part of a Palestinian independent state, not an American colony.

Human rights organizations have also described Trump’s proposal as “ethnic cleansing” and condemning it. Trump had promised to end the foreign wars in his campaign, but did not deny the possibility of US troops being sent to Gaza during his meeting with Netanyahu.

Republicans who tend to “US First” policy or prioritize US domestic affairs have been hesitant to the proposal, especially as the Trump administration is dissolving the foreign aid program, a plan that uses US taxpayers’ funds for international projects. .

A source close to Trump has revealed that Gaza’s proposal was completely Trump’s personal idea and that he was thinking about for at least six months. A US official said Trump has made the offer because no one has a new idea for the future of Gaza.

However, the US media reports that the current chaos in the new Trump government is by no means accidental. According to Alexius, Trump and his team want to make it difficult for opposition to the opposition by constantly flooding ideas, executive orders and announcements.

The report said that Trump’s actions in various fields, including controversial options for ministries, business threats against Canada and Mexico, threats to the conquest of Greenland or controversy over Tiktak’s social network have in fact created a large volume of information that process and process. Their rapid analysis is not possible for any human.

The end of the message