4 American ways to occupy Greenland; From military threat to economic promise – Mehr News Agency RCO News Agency

Mehr News Agency, International Group: US President Donald Trump has a special interest in Greenland Island, and this interest is not limited to expressing a political opinion. With the escalation of tensions in Venezuela and the implementation of rapid military operations against this country, the idea of ​​Greenland joining the United States has been raised once again, and European analysts consider this issue serious.

Trump has repeatedly stated that the US needs the island, and considers this to be due to threats from the increasing presence of Russia and China around the Arctic. This approach has caused disagreements within the US government about how to exert influence on Greenland, and some officials such as Internal Security Advisor Steven Miller have openly questioned the legitimacy of Denmark’s sovereignty over the island and pointed out that no one would be willing to go to war with America for the future of Greenland.

The importance of Greenland and the Arctic

Greenland is of great strategic importance due to its geographical location and natural resources. Proximity to the east coast of the United States, the ability to install missile early warning systems and the potential to create a second nuclear base in the event of a war with Russia have made the island a key point in American national security. Also, with the melting of the polar ice, shorter sea transportation routes and access to natural resources including oil, gas and vital minerals will be provided, which will not only affect the global economy but also increase Greenland’s geopolitical power.

New sea routes such as the Northwest Passage and the North Sea Route will reduce transit times between Europe and the Far East, allowing for faster access to markets and resources. China and Russia are also present in this region and have strengthened their infrastructure and bases.

Trump sees Greenland as a key element in ensuring US hegemony in the Arctic and is trying to steer the island’s political future towards Washington’s interests by strengthening its military and economic presence. Greenland’s position in the North Pole has made this island an important center in the competition of great powers to control sea transportation routes and access to strategic resources.

China and Russia have increased their investments in these areas, and the United States is trying to dominate this competition by focusing on Greenland. Considering the strategic importance of the island, Trump has repeatedly emphasized that this place is essential for American national security and that the American military and economic presence there can play a key role in controlling strategic routes.

Europe’s reaction and concerns

Trump’s statements about Greenland have met with a strong reaction from Europe, and European countries emphasize their support for Denmark’s sovereignty and the island’s independence. However, concerns remain about the possibility of unilateral US action and its impact on the NATO alliance. European analysts believe that the scenario of direct occupation is unlikely, but the American attempt to change the political situation of the island in its favor seems likely during the Trump presidency. At the same time, Europe is trying to put diplomatic pressure on Washington and prevent any action that could endanger the political stability and security of the region.

Trump’s strategy and encouraging independence

Trump uses two paths to achieve his goals. First, creating a gap between Greenland and Denmark and encouraging independence tendencies on the island. The effort to attract the direct support of the island people through dialogue and the appointment of US special representatives shows that Washington intends to include Greenland as an independent actor in its interactions. Second, the provision of direct economic and military agreements with the island, known as the “free communication agreement”, which allows the US military presence and access to strategic resources, and in return, economic facilities and trade exemptions are granted to the island. These routes allow Trump to use direct and indirect means and consolidate his influence in Greenland.

The future of negotiations and people’s desire

The main goal of the people of Greenland is to maintain independence, and 85% of the population opposes joining the United States directly. However, perceptions of economic opportunities are different and nearly half consider it a threat and the other half consider it an opportunity. The success of the talks will depend on the ability of Greenland’s leaders to capitalize on Trump’s attention and put pressure on Denmark, which could pave the way for the island to win wider concessions and strengthen independence. The people of Greenland are cautious considering their economic interests, geopolitical position and the presence of big powers in the region, and their decisions will play an important role in shaping the political and economic future of the island.

Possible US scenarios

In a report, The Times pointed out four main paths that Washington might take to gain control of Greenland. The first way is to use direct military force. In terms of military power, the US is able to occupy an island with a small population like Greenland without serious resistance, but this option has many risks and may lead to the collapse of NATO and the intensification of Russian-Chinese competition in the region. The second way is applying economic and political pressure. With vast financial resources at his disposal, Trump can use this tool to persuade the people and government of Greenland, promising to invest billions in the economy dependent on Danish fishing and aid. In this context, the US has tried to attract local support by opening a consulate and providing educational and development aid, and at the same time, accusations have been raised about encouraging pro-independence tendencies.

The third path is to create a free association or an agreement similar to the US agreements with the Pacific islands, where the island enjoys apparent independence, but the US military has full rights to operate there and enjoys extensive commercial benefits. This option requires the approval of the Danish Parliament and Denmark tries to avoid it. The fourth way is to use several tools at the same time. In this case, Denmark can maintain its nominal sovereignty and the US receives military presence and economic benefits, so that Trump can increase the ceiling of demands with his trade tactics and even if he does not reach all the initial goals, he still gets a large part of what he wants.

the result

The recent developments in Greenland have once again shown that America neither adheres to international laws nor respects the sovereignty of people and countries. Trying to put direct pressure on the government and people of Greenland, encouraging independence tendencies in favor of Washington’s interests, and offering economic and military promises as a means of influence, is a clear example of the politics of coercion and the use of power to impose the will on others. Trump has openly challenged the sovereignty of Denmark and the independence of the island, and with indirect threats, he is trying to gain privileges beyond the legal rights of the United States.

This behavior not only threatens Greenland’s political independence, but also endangers the geopolitical stability of the Arctic and international shipping routes. By focusing on the island’s natural resources and strategic location, Washington shows that it prioritizes its economic and military interests over people’s rights and international laws. This approach is an example of unilateralism and hegemony that can become a dangerous model for other regions of the world, where great powers try to exert influence by force and threats without regard to the laws.