The perspective of the American national security document; How was the confrontation with Iran drawn?

Bashir Esmaili, an international affairs expert, wrote in a note for ISNA: With the release of the US National Security Strategy document in recent days, some analysts have come to the conclusion that the US, at least in its declared policy, tends to return to a period of “neo-isolationism” after the 19th century.

This policy came into being in the form of the thoughts of those who theorized concepts like “America First” and the “MAGA” movement in Trump’s mind, and now it seems that despite having many opponents, it has gained a relative victory over other thoughts.

This new foreign policy will be accompanied by a historical decentralization of the West Asian region; In fact, after the Vietnam War and the “Niscon two-pillar” policy, this may be the first time that the United States has again thought of outsourcing the West Asian region to its allies.

America’s main concern in the region

Insisting on the finalization of the “Ibrahim Pact” is actually an attempt to settle the situation of the Zionist regime with the countries of the region so that America can safely reduce its focus on West Asia.

In the US national security strategy document, the issue of energy transfer security and preventing the takeover of regional energy resources by competitors has been introduced as the main concern of the US in West Asia. But the more important concern of America is to maintain the security of the Zionist regime and to establish the balance of power in such a way that this regime is not in a position of weakness; A concern that is not directly mentioned in an American security document.

3 coping strategies for America’s confrontation with Iran

It is in this direction that “Nathaniel Swanson”, the senior researcher and director of the Iran Strategy Project at the American think tank “Atlantic Council”, recently introduced three solutions for America in facing Iran, which include “maintaining the status quo”, “outsourcing the crisis”, and “reaching a new agreement”.

In the final analysis, the think tank concludes that the best option for the United States would be to reach a new agreement. Moreover, in one of Trump’s recent speeches, he also announced his desire to reach a new agreement with Iran.

Iran’s pragmatic diplomacy

Simultaneously with the mentioned developments, following the News and events of these days, it indicates that the diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been very mature, practical and logical in the recent period.

The first point in this regard is that by gaining experience from the previous behavior of the US and especially Trump, the Islamic Republic of Iran considers the possibility of a sudden change of opinion or even a deception operation of the US likely. In fact, all the signs mentioned in Trump’s speech or even in the national security strategy document can become ineffective because the Americans have shown that they have no qualms about radically changing their declared positions.

Secondly, as it has been tested before, the Islamic Republic of Iran has not delayed its foreign and domestic policy to reach an agreement with America and has active diplomacy with other countries.

The recent meeting of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran with the Deputy Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia and China, the meeting of the President with Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the Ashgabat meeting, and the visit of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan to our country are among the important developments in the process of active and dynamic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in recent days.

2 necessary features of America’s offer to Iran

Regardless of the fact that America has turned to isolationism; and whether he sees the agreement as the best option with Iran or not; The diplomatic dynamism of the Islamic Republic of Iran by activating the existing capacities in non-western parties seems to be the best option at the present time.

On the other hand, if America and other western parties present a suitable option for diplomacy, it can also be considered, provided that their proposal has two important features; First, it should be in line with mutual interests and away from the position of domineering and self-righteousness usual in their previous practice, and secondly, it should be able to prove the guarantee of implementation and verification of proposals.

The loss of color of the Iranophobia project

In any case, whether America is looking for a new agreement with Iran based on the mentioned evidence, or whether the Zionist regime can again convince the authorities of that country for new tensions, the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic will not delay anything and will continue on its way with more strength and power. As many analysts admit, the two years of belligerence and brutality of the Zionist regime finally forced the countries of the region to admit that the most important enemy is the Zionist regime and that the “Iranophobia” project, which was dominated by the indoctrination of the US and the Israeli regime, has now completely faded.

Among the non-western powers of the world, Iran is now considered a responsible, well-intentioned and reliable country. Characteristics that can facilitate the current effective and beneficial diplomatic process and clarify the future perspective “with or without the West”.

end of message