The perspective of the American national security docume; How was the confroation with Iran drawn?
After many years, the US has again thought of outsourcing the West Asian region to its allies, but Iran’s diplomatic dynamics by activating the capacities available in non-Western parties seems to be the best option at the prese time.
Bashir Esmaili, an iernational affairs expert, wrote in a note for ISNA: With the release of the US National Security Strategy docume in rece days, some analysts have come to the conclusion that the US, at least in its declared policy, tends to return to a period of “neo-isolationism” after the 19th ceury.
This policy came io being in the form of the thoughts of those who theorized concepts like “America First” and the “MAGA” moveme in Trump’s mind, and now it seems that despite having many oppones, it has gained a relative victory over other thoughts.
This new foreign policy will be accompanied by a historical deceralization of the West Asian region; In fact, after the Vietnam War and the “Niscon two-pillar” policy, this may be the first time that the United States has again thought of outsourcing the West Asian region to its allies.
America’s main concern in the region
Insisting on the finalization of the “Ibrahim Pact” is actually an attempt to settle the situation of the Zionist regime with the couries of the region so that America can safely reduce its focus on West Asia.
In the US national security strategy docume, the issue of energy transfer security and preveing the takeover of regional energy resources by competitors has been iroduced as the main concern of the US in West Asia. But the more importa concern of America is to maiain the security of the Zionist regime and to establish the balance of power in such a way that this regime is not in a position of weakness; A concern that is not directly meioned in an American security docume.
Trump signing an executive order
3 coping strategies for America’s confroation with Iran
It is in this direction that “Nathaniel Swanson”, the senior researcher and director of the Iran Strategy Project at the American think tank “Atlaic Council”, recely iroduced three solutions for America in facing Iran, which include “maiaining the status quo”, “outsourcing the crisis”, and “reaching a new agreeme”.
In the final analysis, the think tank concludes that the best option for the United States would be to reach a new agreeme. Moreover, in one of Trump’s rece speeches, he also announced his desire to reach a new agreeme with Iran.
Iran’s pragmatic diplomacy
Simultaneously with the meioned developmes, following the News and eves of these days, it indicates that the diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been very mature, practical and logical in the rece period.
The first poi in this regard is that by gaining experience from the previous behavior of the US and especially Trump, the Islamic Republic of Iran considers the possibility of a sudden change of opinion or even a deception operation of the US likely. In fact, all the signs meioned in Trump’s speech or even in the national security strategy docume can become ineffective because the Americans have shown that they have no qualms about radically changing their declared positions.
Secondly, as it has been tested before, the Islamic Republic of Iran has not delayed its foreign and domestic policy to reach an agreeme with America and has active diplomacy with other couries.
The rece meeting of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran with the Deputy Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia and China, the meeting of the Preside with Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the Ashgabat meeting, and the visit of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan to our coury are among the importa developmes in the process of active and dynamic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in rece days.
Meeting between Fidan and Araghchi in Tehran
2 necessary features of America’s offer to Iran
Regardless of the fact that America has turned to isolationism; and whether he sees the agreeme as the best option with Iran or not; The diplomatic dynamism of the Islamic Republic of Iran by activating the existing capacities in non-western parties seems to be the best option at the prese time.
On the other hand, if America and other western parties prese a suitable option for diplomacy, it can also be considered, provided that their proposal has two importa features; First, it should be in line with mutual ierests and away from the position of domineering and self-righteousness usual in their previous practice, and secondly, it should be able to prove the guaraee of implemeation and verification of proposals.
Zionist attack on Doha
The loss of color of the Iranophobia project
In any case, whether America is looking for a new agreeme with Iran based on the meioned evidence, or whether the Zionist regime can again convince the authorities of that coury for new tensions, the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic will not delay anything and will coinue on its way with more strength and power. As many analysts admit, the two years of belligerence and brutality of the Zionist regime finally forced the couries of the region to admit that the most importa enemy is the Zionist regime and that the “Iranophobia” project, which was dominated by the indoctrination of the US and the Israeli regime, has now completely faded.
Among the non-western powers of the world, Iran is now considered a responsible, well-ieioned and reliable coury. Characteristics that can facilitate the curre effective and beneficial diplomatic process and clarify the future perspective “with or without the West”.
end of message
