The dimensions of the American plan for the administration of Gaza; Applying restrictions on Palestinian sovereigy – Mehr News agency RCO News Agency
Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: The US plan to manage the post-war phase in Gaza, which was iroduced through Security Council Resolution 2803, has created a new stage of organized iernational ierveion in this region. On the surface, this plan is preseed with the aim of reconstruction and stabilization, but a closer examination of the documes and statemes of the American and Israeli officials shows that its real goal is the political, security and economic corol of Gaza. A major part of the consequences of this plan is directly linked to the geopolitical ierests of America and Israel and creates serious threats to the sovereigy, population and economy of Palestine.
The general structure of the plan and the concept of redevelopme of Gaza
Resolution 2803 provides the framework for the creation of an institution called the Peace Council and the establishme of the Iernational Stability Force. This council has the authority to supervise the reconstruction, determine the terms of aid and manage the administrative coordination of Gaza, and its chairmanship has been given to the Preside of the United States uil the end of 2027. One of the most sensitive pois is the inclusion of the word “redevelopme” in the text of the resolution, which means extensive destruction and reconstruction of urban areas based on a new model. This shows that the view of the designers is beyond the post-war reconstruction and the macro, demographic and ownership change of Gaza is the main goal. US and Israeli officials also insist that Gaza must be rebuilt in a differe way, which is a direct threat to its curre structure and demographic ideity.
Coinuation of demolition operations and displaceme of population
In the Gaza Strip, even after the declaration of a ceasefire, the planned destruction of resideial areas coinued and thousands of buildings were destroyed. These measures create empty space for the implemeation of new plans and the removal of Palestinian population ceers. Severe restrictions on the arrival of aid and not allowing resides to return have turned this process io a tool for structured displaceme. The division of Gaza io green, yellow and red zones has created a situation where the resides of the destroyed areas have only three options: emigrate, settle in restricted areas or accept the new order under iernational manageme. This situation is a direct threat to the right to return home, own property and choose a place to live, and turning reconstruction io population engineering is one of the most importa consequences of this plan for Palestinians.
Iernational force and proposed security structure
According to some media, the iernational stability force will include European and Jordanian forces and will include about 20,000 people. This force is responsible for disarming Palestinian groups, protecting redevelopme projects and operational cooperation with Israeli forces. Foreign military presence for a long time, applying a security model similar to the areas under foreign corol and creating a gap between the differe areas of Gaza, weakens the security independence of Palestine. Such a structure turns Gaza out of the framework of iernal manageme and io a unit under multinational supervision, and creates a serious threat to the collective security and resistance of the Palestinians.
Linking the plan with the geopolitical strategy of America and Israel
America’s plan is related to the coury’s grand strategy in competing with China and establishing influence in West Asia. Gaza’s location on the path of the India-Middle East-Europe corridor has made it a strategic poi in America’s desired economic architecture. From the poi of view of America and Israel, this position will be profitable only when the political structure of Gaza is under corol, the Palestinian resistance is weakened and the demographic structure undergoes fundameal changes. Therefore, the threats are not only security or humanitarian, but they directly target the geopolitical situation of Gaza and turn it io a tool to serve foreign ierests.
Threats and strategic implications of the plan for Palestine and Gaza
The threats caused by this plan are wide and multi-layered. The sovereigy and political will of the Palestinians have been severely limited, and handing over the manageme of Gaza to iernational institutions creates a situation similar to a new trusteeship system, the end of which is unknown. The division of Gaza and the restriction of reconstruction provide the coext for the forced displaceme of the population and threaten the social and demographic coinuity of Gaza. Corol of land and assets is transferred to foreign eities, and Gaza’s natural and economic resources are under the influence of foreign companies.
The presence of foreign forces and disarmame without ending the occupation creates a security vacuum and reduces the resistance of the Palestinians. The plan offers no guaraees for the creation of a Palestinian state and, by changing terms, keeps Gaza’s political horizon unclear. Reconstruction has also become a tool for political pressure and the real needs of the people are given secondary priority. All of these threats put Gaza under multi-level foreign manageme, change its population and economic structure, and make its geopolitical position serve the ierests of America and Israel.
the result
The American plan to govern Gaza, with the appearance of reconstruction and stability, in practice uses security, economic and political tools that limit Palestinian sovereigy and transfer decision-making power to foreign institutions. The redevelopme of Gaza does not only mean rebuilding the destroyed areas, but it also involves changing the urban fabric, dividing the population and restricting resides to certain areas, and threatens the ideity and demographic structure of Gaza. The corol of land, assets and economic resources by foreign institutions and companies reduces the economic independence of Palestinians and the presence of iernational forces weakens their collective resistance.
This plan divides Gaza io corolled areas, restricts reconstruction and creates pressure for immigration or acceptance of the imposed order, and threatens the social and historical coinuity of the cities. The failure to guaraee the formation of an independe governme and the change in the legal vocabulary makes the political horizon of Gaza unclear. At the geopolitical level, this plan stabilizes the influence of America and Israel in the region and puts the position of Gaza in the service of foreign ierests. Finally, reconstruction and appare stability is a means of demographic, economic and political engineering, and the Palestinians have no corol over their own destiny.
