A “insignificant and late” step; What does it mean to recognize the Palestinian state? – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: On the eve of the 80th meeting of the UN General Assembly, and in the light of the coinuation of the crimes and genocide of the Zionist regime in Gaza, some couries, including Britain, Australia, Canada, and Portugal, have officially announced that they recognize the Palestinian state. Today, a number of other couries, including France, Belgium, Luxembourg and Malta, are expected to join the process and recognize the Palestinian governme.

Al -Jazeera news channel reports on the political and legal consequences of the move and predicts that the number of couries that recognize Palestine will reach nine out of 5 UN member states.

Which couries have not yet recognized Palestine

Currely, nearly 2 % of the UN member states have recognized Palestine; But so far at least five couries, including the US and the Zionist regime and its allies, have not recognized the Palestinian governme. In Asia, Japan, South Korea and Singapore, they do not recognize Palestine. Cameron in Africa and Panama in Latin America and most of the small Oceanic couries, which the Zionists usually abuse for their resolutions, have not yet recognized Palestine.

There is the most disagreeme in Europe, and almost half of the couries do not recognize the formation of a Palestinian state.

What does the recognition of the Palestinian state mean?

According to the BBC World website: Palestine is a coury that exists and does not exist. The coury (Palestinian Authority) has a significa amou of iernational ideification, diplomatic represeative abroad, and teams competing in sports competitions including the Olympics. But due to the long -term difference with Israel, there is no definite iernational borders, defined capital, or army. Due to Israel’s military occupation of the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority, which was established following the Peace Agreemes of the 1980s, does not have complete corol over its land and people. Gaza, where Israel is also the power of the occupation, is currely involved in the devastating war.

Given its semi -nuclear state as a quasi -independe state, recognizing it is to some exte symbolic. This will represe a strong stateme morally and politically, but it does not make a tangible change on earth.

But this symbolic is effective. “Britain has a special responsibility to support the two couries’ solutions,” former British Foreign Minister David Lami said in a speech to the United Nations in July.

He referred to the Balfour Declaration – a docume signed by Arthur Balfour, his former couerpart as Secretary of State, and for the first time expressed British support for “creating a national homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine”.

But Lamie added that the declaration was accompanied by a serious promise: “There is no action that would endanger the civil and religious rights of non -Jewish societies in Palestine.” Israeli supporters have often poied out that Lord Balfour did not explicitly meion the Palestinians or their national rights. But the land that was previously called Palestine, and Britain ruled it through the United Nations from 1 to 2, has long been regarded as an iernational issue.

Israel was founded in year 6, but efforts to establish a parallel Palestinian governme have been impaired for many reasons. As Lamie said, politicians have become accustomed to repeating the term “two -coury solution”. The two-governme solution refers to the creation of the Palestinian governme in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. But iernational efforts to realize the two -coury solution have failed, and Israel’s colonialism in large parts of the West Bank, which is illegal under iernational law, has made this concept an almost unquestionable slogan. “

“Roman LobovA professor of iernational law at the University of X-Mars in southern France described the recognition of the Palestinian state as one of the most complex issues in iernational law. He told AFP that couries are free to choose time and form, and there are many obvious or implicit differences between couries ieracting with this phenomenon.

According to Lobov, there is no ceer for registering couries. He added: The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank records the names of couries that have recognized Palestine, but this is a completely subjective view.

Another poi in iernational law is that “recognizing does not mean creating a coury, just as non -recognition does not preve a coury from being recognized.” Of course, recognizing is largely symbolic and political. Therefore, three -quarters of the world now believe that Palestine has all the requiremes for being a coury.

“Philip Sands” “I know this seems symbolic to many, but in fact, it can be a symbolic change,” a French-British lawyer and professor of French-British law wrote in mid-August. “As soon as you recognize the coury of Palestine … You put Palestine and Israel at the same level for their treatme of iernational law.”

Palestinian political and legal consequences in iernational communities

Al -Jazeera adds that these recognitions are an importa step for Palestine because they have political and legal consequences. This is boycotting the Zionist cabinet extremists.

The Palestinian Authority considers the recognition of the coury of political and legal importance and considers it in line with the efforts made to end the occupation and establishme of the Palestinian state.

“Ahmad al -Dik” In a conversation with Al -Jazeera, the political adviser to the Foreign Minister and the Authority’s immigras stated that Palestine is “courageously in line with iernational law and iernational legitimacy resolutions and support for efforts to end the occupation and achieve peace as well as the rights of the Palestinian rights.”

He added that Palestine will act on these recognitions to achieve the full membership of the United Nations instead of a supervisor and try to maximize political, diplomatic, legal and iernational efforts to achieve several goals, which are:

• Accouability and trial of the occupiers for the sake of their crimes.
• End the unilateral actions of the occupiers uil the implemeation of iernational legitimacy resolutions and the Arab peace plan.
• Reinforceme.
• Strengthening and developing Palestinian relations with differe couries in numerous fields.

The Palestinian official listed the political and protocol ierests after being recognized in iernational assemblies:

• Promoting the level of represeation of the Palestinian embassies from the delegations to the embassies, and to raise the Palestinian flag.
• In some couries, Palestinian ambassadors’ credeials will be preseed to the highest level in those couries as Palestinian ambassadors..

Why is this symbolic moveme importa?

«Bilal al -ShubakiIn a conversation with Al -Jazeera, a professor of political science at Al -Khalil University, describing the importance of the increase in couries that recognize Palestine, in the face of the Zionist regime’s efforts to eradicate the Palestinian issue and the possibility of establishing a Palestinian state, saying that these recognitions have been made in terms of scheduling.

Zionists will iensify repression in Palestine

The political analyst says that this step – despite its importance – seems very small and limited, because the curre priority for every Palestinian citizen is to stop genocide in the Gaza Strip.

He added that some couries have used the issue of recognizing the Zionist regime or forcing it to stop genocide in Gaza, while they have much more solutions to the Zionist regime, which can include sanctions and diplomatic relations.

In response to the recognition of Palestine, al -Shaubaki predicted the spread of the Zionist regime’s repression in the West Bank, adding: “What Israel does in reality is to turn iernational recognition from an action with a practical impact io a purely psychological eve.”

Palestinian recognition is merely symbolic

On the other hand ‘Adnan HamidanThe British expert emphasized that the British recognition of the Palestinian state had importa messages and is beyond a political declaration, as it has an importa role in the Palestinian suffering and problems by issuing a Balphor treaty and now it is forced to ideify the Palestinian state.

The Palestinian expert added that the act does not compensate for the occupation’s crime in consolidating the Palestinian land in the Zionist’s favor, but it is a major change in British political discourse, and for Palestinians Gaza carries the message to the world whose narrative was real and their right to be in their land.

Hamidan coinued that the decision does not change the balance of field power, but influences symbolic stances and becomes a political tool that the Palestinians can use against the Zionists in diplomatic fields.

He poied to British action in this regard, stressing that the British governme was not unrelated to the general atmosphere in Europe and the iernational arena, and the message is that silence is no longer a good option, in addition to being able to put pressure on other governmes to recognize the Palestinian state and raise the issue of Palestine as a major issue.

A late step and meaningless

On the other hand ‘Soheil KhaliliehThe settleme expert said of the possible Zionist regime’s actions in response to the wave created by Palestine. E3 Located in the east of the occupied Quds and the swallowing of several other Palestinian villages in Quds and its accession to the occupied territories can be among these measures.

At the same time, he described the move as late and emphasized: The recognition may have been coe or meaning, for example, if it were five years ago, but they came late and Tel Aviv would exploit them to achieve its goals.