Bennice’s decisive victory in London court! Rejection

Ramsar Benin’s currency exchanges sought to reject much of the petition filed in London’s court on Wednesday. The petition, which is worth 10 billion pounds (about 12.8 billion US dollars), claims that Binens and other Ramsar currency exchanges have collapsed from the trading list for the Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) digital currency.

According to the Technical Technology Digital Media News Service, binoches and currency exchanges such as Krakon have been sued in the London Competition Review (CAT) court. The case, which has been represeed by more than 200,000 BSV owners, is based on claiming ai -competitive exchanges’ behavior in the elimination of BSV from the 2019 trading list.

BSV Claims lawyers, the follow -up legal eity of the case, argue that the currency exchanges to remove the BSV from the list have led to the value of this digital currency and preve it from being converted io a high -end digital currency. They have estimated the value of this part of their claims of up to £ 9 billion. Although BSV Claims lawyers do not oppose certification for this case under the British collective judiciary (similar to the US mass litigation), Benin has called for a rejection of that part of the case that focuses on the BSV’s alleged poteial to become an importa digital currency. This part of the complai is represeed by people who have coinued to keep it after removing the BSV from the list.

Brian Canley, a lawyer for Bainnis, argues that BSV owners have made a completely optional decision to keep it after being removed from the list. “They could reasonably sell the BSV and re -invest in a digital currency,” he said. In corast, BSV Claims lawyers have emphasized in court documes that this issue should be referred to the proceedings along with other parts of the case.

Benin has refused to comme on the ongoing cases. A spokesman for Krakken has also called the complai baseless. BSV exit from the list of transactions by Binens, Krake and other exchanges in 2019 was partly in response to the claims of Australian computer scieist Craig Wright and a BSV -related figure. Wright claimed to be the anonymous inveor of Bitcoin, nicknamed Satoshi Nakamoto. It should be noted that at the beginning of this year, a court in a separate case seenced Wright to lies and forging documes to support his fake claim that Satoshi was Nakamoto. Wright has announced that it will appeal against the verdict.