How did Hezbollah’s clever position disrupt the Zionist calculations? – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

According to RCO News Agency, following the non -national decision of the Lebanese governme and surrendering the US dictates to disarm the resistance, which was accompanied by Hezbollah’s harsh reaction, the Al -Akhbar newspaper wrote in an article written by Ali Haidar, a promine Lebanese author and analyst: The governme’s decision by the Prime Minister of Nawaf Salam, the prime minister of the Lebanese prime minister.

US and Zionist betting on the inaction of the Lebanese governme

The coe of the Lebanese governme and the timing of its implemeation is the culmination of a long process that began to emerge from the end of the rece war against Lebanon last year. Although the decision was issued by a Lebanese official, its deeper consequences will be expanded to the next period; In particular, the Zionist regime coinues to violate the ceasefire agreeme.

On the other hand, the major developmes in the Syrian scene and its consequences for resistance have made the Zionist regime more rude to spread tensions against Lebanon. Despite the enemy’s success in inflicting heavy blows on Hezbollah’s capabilities and targeting its senior leaders, especially Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah and Sayyid Hashim Safi al -Din, after the next phase of the Battle of Hezbollah, the Zionists, the Zionists found out that the choice of air superiority and military pressure in Lead.

As a result, the strategy of the occupation regime and its American supporter moved to more flexible and less costly options and tools based on the siege and weakening of Hezbollah from within Lebanon itself. The strategy involved trying to eliminate the National Ceer for Resistance Developme and pressure the Lebanese governme to make decisions that target the existence and weapons of resistance. The mission has been carried out directly by the US in Lebanon in rece mohs after the ceasefire.

How did Hezbollah’s clever position disrupt the Zionist calculations?

From the Zionist regime’s poi of view, the Lebanese governme’s decision to disarm the resistance is one of the key steps to impleme the Tel Aviv and Washington project to bring Lebanon io iernal clashes; Where the Lebanese governme, with its decision to disarm Hezbollah, has removed the resistance from the framework of a unifying factor and has set up a rebellion against the governme.

But these Zionist bets did not last, and Hezbollah’s stateme quickly returned the sheet and put the Lebanese governme’s decision to disarm the resistance within the framework of illegal and illegal decisions. Hezbollah also adhered to the conspiracy to disarm the moveme with the logic of national sovereigy and preve any iernal tensions. Hezbollah has also clearly defined its position on the next step: the definitive decision to disarm the resistance and the failure to recognize the decision without resorting to separation from the governme or eering an iernal conflict.

This approach of Hezbollah represes a high degree of political discipline; Because Hezbollah avoids falling io the trap of iernal conflict without endangering its strengths, and relying on the constitution, a ministerial stateme and the legitimacy of resistance that has gained its national legitimacy over the past decades.

In general, Hezbollah had three paths ahead: the acceptance of American-Zionist dictates, direct conflict with the governme, or adopting a political maneuvering option without conflict. Hezbollah clearly chose the third path; Because both cost and effectiveness were the best option. This option gives Hezbollah enough space to maneuver in governme agencies and has so far failed to bring enemy bets to resistance to an iernal conflict. The option also allows Hezbollah to consolidate the discussion of weapons as a battle for national sovereigy.

The Zionist regime realizes that Hezbollah’s stance disrupts Washington’s and Tel Aviv calculations and reduces the Lebanese governme’s ability to impleme resistance disarmame without any iernal explosion. But the key question remains: Will the Zionist regime exploit the Nawaf governme’s decision to legitimize its aggression against resistance in the new phase?

From the poi of view of the ierests of the Zionist regime, the response is positive, and this decision allows the Zionists to iervene under the pretext of supporting the Lebanese governme’s decision on its affairs. But from the poi of view of Lebanon’s ierests, the coinuation and iensification of the Zionist attacks will undoubtedly prove that there is a direct relationship between the disarmame of the Zionist resistance and the Zionist strategy to coinue aggression against Lebanon to dominate the coury.

Outlook the next step after the Lebanese governme’s decision against resistance weapons

By evaluating this situation, it can be said that the next phase depends on the subtle balance between the three active forces: the governme’s ability to impleme this decision in the midst of a political and social space, Hezbollah’s ability to resist pressure without exerting an iernal conflict, the Zionist regime’s ability to stay on the sidelines without being accused without accusation.

The decision to disarm the resistance in Lebanon does not end the fight against the Zionist regime; Rather, it opens a new chapter. The distinctive poi in this season is that there is no new confroation with bullets and bombs, but through political tools. In this regard, Hezbollah has decided to act as a defender of national sovereigy against a foreign project in the battle.

Therefore, a new border line in Lebanon is drawn between the political engineering imposed by the Zionist regime and the United States from outside and Hezbollah’s sovereigy. This time this line passes not only from the south, but also the heart of the Lebanese governme, in the constitutional texts, the balance of power in the governme, the discourse of legitimacy, and the conscience of the people today with a vital question: Who is the true defender of sovereigy and who protects Lebanon against foreign threats?