Why the Lebanese government exacerbate the pressure on Hezbollah for disarmament; Invitation to Suicide – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: On the fifth anniversary of the explosion of the Beirut Port, the Joseph Aoun administration held a special meeting on the status of weapons in the hands of domestic groups throughout Lebanon. According to news reports from the meeting, the ministers close to Hezbollah and the Amal Moveme, when Aoun and Salam were trying to implicitly “positive vote” of all ministers on the disarmame of resistance. However, the new Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf said to the media after the meeting that the Arab governme had ordered the army to formulate and prese a plan to fully corol the governme. Nine hours later, the Lebanese Ielligence Minister announced that the cabinet announced the end of all armed groups from Hezbollah’s attack across the coury and is expected to be deployed in the border.

A few hours away, the Lebanese Defense Minister announced the launch of the resistance’s disarmame. Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Reji also described the “final” and “final” personality affiliated with Al -Arabiya’s ierview with al -Arabiya. Tom Barack also described the decision of the Lebanese ministers as historical, courageous and correct, claiming that Washington supported the Lebanese people. Apparely, the deadline for implemeing the plan has been announced by the end of this year.

In response to the remarks, the Lebanese parliameary speaker Nabih Barry and the leader of Jenis Amal Label criticized the governme’s policy, saying that Beirut should first think of Israel’s aggressive presence in southern Lebanon and repeatedly violating the ceasefire by Israel and then calling for negotiations on the weapon of resistance!

Hezbollah supporters and the Amal moveme also demonstrated in the southern cities of Lebanon, declared their support for the weapon of resistance as a guaraor of Lebanon’s independence. It seems that the increasing increase in foreign pressure on the Lebanese governme has led the cabinet to consider Lebanon’s “national ierests” only to persuade its foreign supporters, including the United States.

The deceitful plan of Thomas Barack

A Hebrew source emphasized: Last moh, US Special Represeative for Syria, Thomas Barack, was strongly consulted with Lebanese officials to create a line of talks with Hezbollah. According to the Hebrew source, although Barack has failed to find a direct line to connect with resistance, it has shared its idea with Lebanese governme officials. Unlike Morgan Ortegas, Barack has decided to start a more complex game with resistance. In the project, Trump’s Special Represeative iends to separate the “political” branch of the resistance from the “military” branch in the “first step”. The model, which was also operational against the Hamas moveme, will provide the Americans the opportunity to divide the iernal members of the Lebanese Islamic resistance and provide the legitimacy of future action against the Lebanese Islamic resistance.

In the second step, Barack iends to show Washington’s responsibility for Lebanese security concerns by proposing the idea of disarmame of Hezbollah. In this model, Americans claim that they are only looking for Hezbollah weapons that are “existeial threats” against Israel and provide the basis for the Zionist regime’s re -invasion of Lebanon. Washington has placed itself as a “mediator” and “peaceful” actor, which has been clearly in Israel’s field performance, and this has been revealed to external observers and regional experts over the past five days. In the face of such a policy, the best strategy seems to focus on the issue of “rebuilding and repairing” iernal forces to threats ahead of Lebanon and the Zionist regime.

Messenger’s equation

The way the Lebanese parliame voted and the election of Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam as the new Preside and Prime Minister Lebanon shows the formation of a political coalition among influeial foreign actors such as the US, Saudi, France and, of course, the Zionist regime in Lebanon. The actors decided to take Hezbollah to the “disarmame” and provide the ground for reviving the period of civil war under the pretext of strengthening the Lebanese governme.

France has threatened that, upon request, the Lebanese army is willing to directly assist in the disarmame process. Trump’s America has also abandoned the cautious approach of previous US governmes in Lebanon and iends to provide a direct ery io Netanyahu’s demand by eering the crisis.

Existeial battle

Following the announceme of a ceasefire between Hezbollah and the Zionist regime in September, followed by the fall of Bashar al -Assad in Damascus, the power equation in the Shamat region has changed. In line with the demands of Saak and Israel, the Julani regime has been prese at Hezbollah’s logistical lines on Syrian soil and plans to preve weapons from moving from the area to southern Lebanon. The numerous operations of the Julani and the Zionist regime against Hezbollah’s arms path are a clear example of this policy. At the same time as the Lebanese-Lebanese talks on the security situation in the south of the coury, Thomas Barack threatened to use the colonial literature that the new Syrian governme may seek to develop territorial and completely accessible Lebanon io Syrian lands!

Saying such a threatening statemes, when Israel’s Alma Institute said, has not stopped terrorist acts against Hezbollah forces and sources over the past eight mohs! For Hezbollah leaders, Julani and the Zionist regime are two vital threats that besiege Lebanon and any security shortness against them can permanely eliminate Lebanon’s name from geographical maps. Under such circumstances, there is no clear perspective on the preservation of the fragile fire of Lebanon, but the resistance must be ready for “existeial battle”. In such sensitive circumstances, the Lebanese governme’s decision to move towards the disarmame of Hezbollah is very strange and raises many questions and ambiguities.

Speech ierest

Following the illegal invasion of the Zionist regime in Iran during the six -day war, the Americans’ pressure on the governmes of Baghdad and Beirut to disarm the resistance groups has increased increasingly. This security threat aims to change the balance in the Eastern Arab region and create the necessary platform for the implemeation of strategic projects such as the Developme Road and the Davood Corridor.

Linking to the economic-security ierests of the regional couries in the aforemeioned plans is a new American plan to change the traditional order of the region and build the new Middle East. Under such circumstances, the stoppage of this process will be provided not through the course of self -restrai or diplomatic conversations, but through the full alert of the resistance forces and the hands of the troops on the trigger. The experience of Israel’s adveure in year 6 proved that Hezbollah’s new initiative in the military could change the end result of the most difficult military campaigns and force Tel Aviv to retreat behind the occupied Palestinian borders.