Why the Lebanese government exacerbate the pressure on Hezbollah for disarmament; Invitation to Suicide – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International Group: On the fifth anniversary of the explosion of the Beirut Port, the Joseph Aoun administration held a special meeting on the status of weapons in the hands of domestic groups throughout Lebanon. According to news reports from the meeting, the ministers close to Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, when Aoun and Salam were trying to implicitly “positive vote” of all ministers on the disarmament of resistance. However, the new Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf said to the media after the meeting that the Arab government had ordered the army to formulate and present a plan to fully control the government. Nine hours later, the Lebanese Intelligence Minister announced that the cabinet announced the end of all armed groups from Hezbollah’s attack across the country and is expected to be deployed in the border.

A few hours away, the Lebanese Defense Minister announced the launch of the resistance’s disarmament. Lebanese Foreign Minister Youssef Reji also described the “final” and “final” personality affiliated with Al -Arabiya’s interview with al -Arabiya. Tom Barack also described the decision of the Lebanese ministers as historical, courageous and correct, claiming that Washington supported the Lebanese people. Apparently, the deadline for implementing the plan has been announced by the end of this year.

In response to the remarks, the Lebanese parliamentary speaker Nabih Barry and the leader of Jenis Amal Label criticized the government’s policy, saying that Beirut should first think of Israel’s aggressive presence in southern Lebanon and repeatedly violating the ceasefire by Israel and then calling for negotiations on the weapon of resistance!

Hezbollah supporters and the Amal movement also demonstrated in the southern cities of Lebanon, declared their support for the weapon of resistance as a guarantor of Lebanon’s independence. It seems that the increasing increase in foreign pressure on the Lebanese government has led the cabinet to consider Lebanon’s “national interests” only to persuade its foreign supporters, including the United States.

The deceitful plan of Thomas Barack

A Hebrew source emphasized: Last month, US Special Representative for Syria, Thomas Barack, was strongly consulted with Lebanese officials to create a line of talks with Hezbollah. According to the Hebrew source, although Barack has failed to find a direct line to connect with resistance, it has shared its idea with Lebanese government officials. Unlike Morgan Ortegas, Barack has decided to start a more complex game with resistance. In the project, Trump’s Special Representative intends to separate the “political” branch of the resistance from the “military” branch in the “first step”. The model, which was also operational against the Hamas movement, will provide the Americans the opportunity to divide the internal members of the Lebanese Islamic resistance and provide the legitimacy of future action against the Lebanese Islamic resistance.

In the second step, Barack intends to show Washington’s responsibility for Lebanese security concerns by proposing the idea of disarmament of Hezbollah. In this model, Americans claim that they are only looking for Hezbollah weapons that are “existential threats” against Israel and provide the basis for the Zionist regime’s re -invasion of Lebanon. Washington has placed itself as a “mediator” and “peaceful” actor, which has been clearly in Israel’s field performance, and this has been revealed to external observers and regional experts over the past five days. In the face of such a policy, the best strategy seems to focus on the issue of “rebuilding and repairing” internal forces to threats ahead of Lebanon and the Zionist regime.

Messenger’s equation

The way the Lebanese parliament voted and the election of Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam as the new President and Prime Minister Lebanon shows the formation of a political coalition among influential foreign actors such as the US, Saudi, France and, of course, the Zionist regime in Lebanon. The actors decided to take Hezbollah to the “disarmament” and provide the ground for reviving the period of civil war under the pretext of strengthening the Lebanese government.

France has threatened that, upon request, the Lebanese army is willing to directly assist in the disarmament process. Trump’s America has also abandoned the cautious approach of previous US governments in Lebanon and intends to provide a direct entry into Netanyahu’s demand by entering the crisis.

Existential battle

Following the announcement of a ceasefire between Hezbollah and the Zionist regime in September, followed by the fall of Bashar al -Assad in Damascus, the power equation in the Shamat region has changed. In line with the demands of Santak and Israel, the Julani regime has been present at Hezbollah’s logistical lines on Syrian soil and plans to prevent weapons from moving from the area to southern Lebanon. The numerous operations of the Julani and the Zionist regime against Hezbollah’s arms path are a clear example of this policy. At the same time as the Lebanese-Lebanese talks on the security situation in the south of the country, Thomas Barack threatened to use the colonial literature that the new Syrian government may seek to develop territorial and completely accessible Lebanon into Syrian lands!

Saying such a threatening statements, when Israel’s Alma Institute said, has not stopped terrorist acts against Hezbollah forces and sources over the past eight months! For Hezbollah leaders, Julani and the Zionist regime are two vital threats that besiege Lebanon and any security shortness against them can permanently eliminate Lebanon’s name from geographical maps. Under such circumstances, there is no clear perspective on the preservation of the fragile fire of Lebanon, but the resistance must be ready for “existential battle”. In such sensitive circumstances, the Lebanese government’s decision to move towards the disarmament of Hezbollah is very strange and raises many questions and ambiguities.

Speech interest

Following the illegal invasion of the Zionist regime in Iran during the six -day war, the Americans’ pressure on the governments of Baghdad and Beirut to disarm the resistance groups has increased increasingly. This security threat aims to change the balance in the Eastern Arab region and create the necessary platform for the implementation of strategic projects such as the Development Road and the Davood Corridor.

Linking to the economic-security interests of the regional countries in the aforementioned plans is a new American plan to change the traditional order of the region and build the new Middle East. Under such circumstances, the stoppage of this process will be provided not through the course of self -restraint or diplomatic conversations, but through the full alert of the resistance forces and the hands of the troops on the trigger. The experience of Israel’s adventure in year 6 proved that Hezbollah’s new initiative in the military could change the end result of the most difficult military campaigns and force Tel Aviv to retreat behind the occupied Palestinian borders.