Iran is an essential pillar of the future map of the region; Yemen surrendered the West – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International Group: Yemeni Presidential Advisor Najiba Mohammad Motahar in an interview with Mehr News Agency reporter Verde Saad answered a series of questions about the latest developments in Yemen, especially on the Gaza support Front, which you read the full text of this conversation;

Operations of the Yemeni armed forces against the Zionist regime have intensified in recent weeks. What is the reason for this?

The volume of Israeli occupation crimes in the destruction and destruction of homes and displacing the Palestinians and restricting Islamic sanctuaries has increased. International, Arabic and Islamic silence is strongly condemned.

Operations of the Yemeni armed forces against Israeli ships continued in recent weeks. On the other hand, these operations also include firing supersonic missiles and drones against Zionist targets in Vafa and Naqab and Umm al -Rashrash. In this regard, precise military operations were carried out to attack commercial ships that violated the Zionist naval ban, which resulted in the closure of the port of al -Rasharash (the tribes).

This tension shows that Yemen does not only exist for media support for Gaza, but also in the field of war and siege against itself.

Why can Sanaa always be surprised in the field, whether in terms of tools and strategies, or in terms of goals?

The speech of Sayyid Abdul Malik Badr al -Din and the analysis of Western reactions and the strategic results of the remarks are as follows:

Sayed Abdul Malik al -Houthi, referring to the high volume of Zionist regime’s crimes in Gaza and the Arab and Islamic and international humiliation in the face of this rape, examined Yemen’s constant stance on supporting Palestine despite the war and siege, and emphasized that last week the operations were in place. He emphasized that four companies affiliated with companies that violated maritime ban and maritime interaction with Zionist ports were targeted, which resulted in the closure of the port of Eilat. He emphasized that Yemen would not interact with any decision to oppose its approvals.

The Yemeni national discourse also reflects widespread popular movements in support of Gaza. Over the past week, more than 5 marches and demonstrations were held in various areas, indicating the depth of Yemeni faith and will in support of the Palestinian issue despite economic and political sanctions and pressures.

In the international arena, the discourse also revealed that there is a clear contradiction between the Western and the United Nations; Because, on the one hand, he ignores the crimes of the Zionist occupation, and on the other hand, it launches a wide media blackmail on Yemen’s attack on Israeli sanctions. Western discourse in this area is not only a media reaction, but also reflects strategic developments and accurate perceptions of the interests of Western national and economic security.

Yemen is currently a major threat to the Zionist regime, which culminated through Yemeni naval operations that sank four ships of Majik Siz and International City after rejecting Yemen’s demands in banning the interaction with the Zionist regime.

The operation was carried out when Western countries and the United Nations ignored the crimes of the occupation, and UN envoys Hans Grundberg in Yemen was silent about the aggression of the Zionist regime, but immediately and quickly complained to Yemeni operations. This reflects their obvious inability to the Zionist regime.

The analysis of these positions shows that the attack on Israeli ships is carried out within the framework of Yemeni decisive deterrence against maritime cooperation with the Zionist regime. But the decision does not include ordinary commercial ships that have nothing to do with Israel, and international intelligence reports show that the target was targeted by Zionist ports.

Western forces, on the other hand, claim that the challenge endangers international sailing and is therefore used as an excuse to strengthen military presence in strategic areas such as the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz. They say that these measures lead to the formation of US and NATO -led maritime coalitions and increased pressures and sanctions and media propaganda, and may even move towards limited military operations.

They claim that if the tension continues, Western countries will have to act on redirecting or investing in other land options, which will increase diplomatic and economic pressure on these countries and will have a huge impact on ship insurance and shipping freedom.

The statements and positions of US and European governments and the Zionist regime’s cabinet could be used as a pretext to increase Western military existence in sensitive areas (such as the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz and the South China Sea) under the pretext of supporting freedom of shipping. The US -led international coalition may also be formed or new missions may be formed.

If the risks of the Yemeni armed forces against the Zionist shipping increase, Western countries may seek to replace marine routes or invest in ground routes (such as the Central Asian railroad). This trend increases diplomatic pressure on these countries and forces them to show more clear positions on these threats. As a result of these measures, economic costs are becoming more intense, such as the cost of insurance of ships passing through the disputes, increasing the indirect economic pressure on these countries.

Governments influenced by these attacks may even seek to strengthen their offshore capability, which will increase tensions between Western and other international camps, including Russia and China, and the axis of resistance, providing grounds for expansion of direct maritime tensions.

If the West wants to expand its military presence without parallel political understanding in the region, it will increase risks.

Some media outlets in the Gulf state believe that a possible agreement in Gaza will focus on Yemen and Iraq, which is part of the US and Israeli regime to hit the resistance forces to open the region’s map, what do you view?

The view, which the Persian Gulf media has also addressed, consistently in accordance with wider strategic concepts on the opening of conflicts after several months of war in Gaza and its regional consequences. This analysis is not far from reality and should be examined at the level of basic hypotheses and possible consequences.

Washington insists on organizing the Gaza Front before reaching autumn. At the same time, Israel needs an alternative strategic victory to compensate for the failure of Hamas. Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon, on the other hand, are a future deterrence environment, especially in the light of the continuation of their attacks on the interests of the US and the Zionist regime.

As a result of these data, the United States has been trying to separate the Gaza Front from other areas, including Yemen, Lebanon and Iraq for several months.

The Middle East is currently witnessing a war in Gaza that has had profound consequences in the regional field, and approaching it can lead the clashes to the opening of influence maps, especially on the Yemeni and Iraqi fronts. In this regard, there are many indicators of the highlight of the constant and central role of resistance, led by Iran.

The Gaza war, on the other hand, has been a fundamental point in the process of regional conflicts and proved the amount of fragility of power balances in the region. Thus, as it approaches, the views focus on the re -form of influence in the Middle East, and the Yemeni and Iraq fronts top the priorities of the US and the Zionist regime so that they may reduce the influence of Iranian leadership resistance.

To what extent has the stability of Iran’s step and the breaking of the enemy’s awe by the country’s bilaterals?

Iran plays a key role in disrupting regional balances that will form a new approach in regional realities in the coming stage. These facts can be mentioned in the following:

1. The axis of resistance views this stage as the stage before the “Great War”.

2. The reactions to prevent a widespread war will be calculated and have longer strategic effects.

1. Washington and Tel Aviv have counted on the breakdown of the conflict, but the existing reality shows that the axis of resistance is attacked on one side, and on the other hand reacts to the meaning that there is unity between the active fronts. In other words, Iran and its strategic resistance at the heart of regional developments will be a central factor in the opening and disruption of regional and international monuments.

The stability of Iran’s step has broken the awe and deterrence of the Zionist regime and proved the shakeness of Western defense systems.

Iran has played a role in these areas in recent months:

1. Iran has not been brief over US policy.

2. Despite all the dangers and influences, Iran has continued to support its allies.

1. Tehran has responded directly or indirectly to attacks.

1. In April, Iran fired its missiles and drones into the occupied territory in response to a missile attack on its consulate in Damascus.

1. Iran has played a major role in the opening of regional developments.

1. In the new developments in the region, the Zionist regime is no longer the only actor in the region capable of deterrence and domination over the Middle East.

1. In these developments, the United States is more in a defensive position and has to protect its bases in Iraq, Syria and Yemen instead of attack.

1. The Gulf states have revised their calculations. Some are seeking convergence with Iran, and others have paused to join various coalitions to attack Iran.

Iran has been able to stand up in recent developments and consolidate its presence in the field of developments and prevent its isolation and consolidation of the war in favor of the enemy. This is changing the calculations of enemies and a new future in the region.

Recent developments have proven that Iran and the axis of resistance will be a key factor in drawing the future influence maps in the region, and no other party can create unilateral domination in the region regardless of this fact; Therefore, regional and international decision -makers must recognize new balances based on the presence of resistance in the region’s equations and refrain from entering the unlimited war with the axis that can capture the region in a wave of violence and turmoil.