Julani, Israeli attacks and the reasons for Erdogan’s silence – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: The widespread Zionist attacks on Damascus and other areas of Syria have been widely reflected in Turkish media and newspapers. Many of today’s Ankara newspapers responded to the attacks and headlines on the fro page, such as “Israeli Attack on the Dinner” and “The Killer Transfer the War to Syria”. The Turkish newspaper Gazette, close to the ruling party, also quoted Ahmad al -Shara, the leader of Syria’s ruling terrorists, saying that he had not left his coury and remained in the capital. But Turkish Preside Recep Tayyip Erdogan did not take a firm stance and preferred to talk more about the importance of new economic agreemes he has signed with the United Arab Emirates.

Ahmed Davut Oglu, the leader of the future party and the former Turkish prime minister, is the first politician to respond to Zionist attacks against Syria, citing Sweda’s eves, stimulating ethnic and sectarian groups. Davutoglu believes that the division of Syria io the Sunni, Alavi, Kurdish and Druze areas is Netanyahu’s most importa goal in Syria, and he has modeled the French classical colonial goals. Davutoglu, by proposing an eight -story strategy for Ankara, called for Syrian sovereigy to be a Turkish security priority, as well as explicit dialogue with the United States, support for peace, mediation for Kurdish militias, or the Syrian forces, and the establishme of the National Army.

Inaction in the presidency, reaction in parliame

Evaluating Türkiye’s positions on the Zionist regime’s attacks on Syria reflects some kind of division of labor. This means that Rajab Tayyip Erdogan, as preside and leader of the AKP, apparely has special considerations to take a decisive position against Netanyahu. But in order to respond to conservative public opinion within Türkiye, as well as with the aim of managing media propaganda in the Muslim world, he urged parliame to respond limited to this issue. For this reason, Naaman Kurtolmush, a close to Erdogan and the Speaker of Parliame, made a proposal to parliamearians. The plan has described and condemned the Zionist attacks against Damascus. In this coext, it is emphasized that “Türkiye is standing next to the Syrian people and these attacks are unacceptable”.

In a note approved in the open court of the Turkish parliame, the following is used: “Israel violates the UN Charter, the joi commitme of the iernational community, and the rules and principles of iernational law, violate Syria’s territorial iegrity, while at the same time distracting the world’s minds. The attacks are aimed at destabilizing Syria and the region, and the silence and passion of the iernational community make Israel more bold. ” It is also meioned that the Turkish parliame supports the territorial iegrity and sovereigy of Syria. It is noteworthy that the Party of Democracy and the Equality of the Peoples (Samppers) affiliated with Ocalan abstained and did not accompany other Turkish parties.

The Turkish Foreign Minister’s two -sided actions

Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and former head of the Turkish ielligence service is recognized as one of the main architects that led to the empowerme of Ahmad al -Shara and al -Sham al -Sham in Damascus. Fidan’s actions have shown that he is currely taking a kind of two -way diplomatic play to show Turkey as a supporter of the Gaza people in the world, and on the other hand, to persuade Netanyahu to stop attacks with the US, Qatar and others.

“Israel’s blind attacks on Palestinian civilians are genocide and more than 5 million people in the Gaza Strip are indescribable,” said Fidan. Because even food aid distribution pois are attacked. The fact is that in Gaza, hunger is used as a weapon of war, and after 5 years, the world is once again witnessing mandatory labor camps. “

Fidan further highlighted the crimes of the Zionist regime in other geographical areas, including Lebanon, Iran and Syria, and said, “Now, the fact must be clear to us that Israel does not wa peace and does not seek stability.” The Turkish Foreign Minister’s remarks were published in the Turkish and the region, according to Al -Arabiya reports that Fidan has conveyed Ankara’s message to Mossad through the Mate Ielligence Service, and his talks with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Syria, as well as consultations with Syria, were ongoing with US foreign ministers. So it can be clearly seen that Fidan condemns Netanyahu’s crimes in Gaza. But behind the scenes, there is no need for iermediaries, and Mossad and Mate’s relations are so running, and Hakan Fidan seeks to deal with Israel in the curre chaos, not with a decisive approach, but with compassion and pragmatism.

What are Turkish priorities in Syria?

Over the past few mohs, with the launch of Tom Barack as Trump’s special envoy to Syria, which has been led by the US Embassy in Ankara, there have been objective changes in US -Turkish relations. These changes indicate Erdogan’s full satisfaction with Trump’s special envoy to Syria. Because he has established warm relations with Ahmad al -Sharah and has also commeed on the situation of Kurdish militias in northern Syria, in accordance with Ankara’s demands. Barack is the first US official to formally acknowledge the militas called the “Syrian Democratic Forces” (SDF) extending the PKK organization and must be merged io the ranks of the army under Ahmad al -Sharia as soon as possible. So so far, Türkiye’s two importa priorities in Syria are 1- Maiaining power in the hands of Golani and his comrades. 2. Restricting PKK -related Kurdish movemes

Trying to seize the eire Syrian consumer market, while at the same time, the activities of Turkish coractors in multi -billion dollar coracts are another importa goal of Türkiye. Another importa priority of Türkiye in Syria should be assessed on the issue of energy. In rece weeks, Turkish diplomats have met with Azerbaijan Preside Ahmad al -Shari in Baku, and initial preparations for exporting gas from Baku to Syria and through Turkey have been agreed. Also, Turkish officials are not relucta to plan in the eastern Mediterranean to create a natural gas pipeline from the occupied territories to Europe, and the success of the project requires Ankara to never take a stance against the Zionist regime and to express its protests. A review of the above goals and priorities shows that Erdogan’s governme has practically put itself in a special situation and cannot take a strong and firm position against Netanyahu.

By reviewing the eves of rece years, it can be seen that Türkiye has firmly eered the scene in some cases and has even used military ierveion and exercise. For example, Turkish -backed militias fought against Erdogan in Libya, and even some of the Turkish security officers died there. During the Nagorno -Karabakh war, Erdogan had no military support, and in the Syrian crisis, not only arrested nearly two hundred thousand extremist forces, but also occupied parts of Syria, including western Euphrates. But evidence suggests that in any case in the United States and the Zionist regime, Türkiye prefers to carry out the war only in the media field and publish Twitter messages.