Black case of Germany against Iran; from Saddam to the purification of Israeli regime rape – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

‌Mehr News Agency, International Group: While the world was surprised by the aggressive attacks of the Zionist regime on Iranian territory on June 5, and international public opinion was shocked by about four Iranian citizens, including defenseless women and children, “Friedrich. MertsInstead of condemning the attack or even maintaining a diplomatic silence, the German Chancellor called it “legitimate action”.

Merts At the Group 1 summit, “This is what Israel does for the security of all of us”; A sentence that was not only completely disregard for the principles of international law and the UN Charter, but also had the dangerous smell of cleansing crime against civilians.

A few days later, the German Chancellor again emphasized the legitimacy of the Zionist regime’s operations in a reaction that was more like the Dictate of Tel Aviv and said that “there is no doubt about its legality”; A talk that even among some European media outlets Criticized It was.

This stance, especially when even some Western institutions such as the Red Cross and Human Rights Watch have called for an investigation into “the ratio of civilian victims to military targets”, raises important questions about the ethical status of the German government.

In this article, there will be cases of conspiracies and historical companionship of Berlin with the aggressors against Iran;

1. Saddam’s chemical weapons; Serve Germany to a war criminal

During the eight -year Iraq war against Iran, when Iran resisted under bombing and chemical attacks, hundreds of German companies, in coordination with the West German government, provided the Iraqi Ba’athist equipment, technology and raw materials needed to build chemical weapons.

According to the official report of the German Federal Constitutional Conservation Institute, more than 5 German companies participated directly or indirectly in the Iraqi chemical weapons program. This partnership was not hidden, but in many cases through official exports and with the knowledge of the German government.

Among the prominent cooperation was the participation in the establishment of the Samarra factory in Iraq; A set that is specifically for the production of fatal gases such as Tabon, Sarin And the mustard was designed. The factory became Saddam’s chemical arsenal spine and later in catastrophic attacks such as Halabja chemical bombing and anti -Iranian operations in the areas. Faw And insane, it was used. Thousands of civilians, including Iranian women and children and Kurds, were the direct victim of these gases produced with German technology and materials.

In the form of a confidential project called Project 1, German companies sent more than 1.5 tonnes of chemical raw materials to Iraq. Documents released by the United Nations and reflected in media such as the Washington Post in year 6 showed that at least three German companies were also involved in providing biological equipment for the growth and concentration of microbial factors; Equipment capable of converting into mass destruction tools.

Despite the disclosure of this key role in equipping Saddam with forbidden weapons, not only was any court in Germany against its executives, but the German government has never officially apologized for this historic crime against the Iranian nation. This behavior is a black spot on German foreign policy history and shows how economic and strategic benefits overwhelm the principles of human and ethical rights in this country.

2. German silence against the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists

Iran witnessed the assassination of at least five of its prominent nuclear scientists, including Massoud Ali Mohammadi and Majid Shahriari. Although the Zionist regime was the main suspects of these operations, more importantly, Western countries, including Germany, not only condemned these assassinations, but some officials implicitly described them as “necessary for international security”.

In year 4, the German newspaper Der Spiegel quoted an intelligence official as saying: “The assassination of Shahriari showed that there are still ways to stop Iran without a bomb.” These stances Anti -Iranian In the German current media, not only did the space look legitimate for hostile actions, but ultimately helped secure crimes that were explicitly in conflict with international law.

1. Cyber War; The first state -owned cyberattack with Stuxnet

In the summer, malware called “Stuxnet»For the first time it was discovered that especially surveillance and control systems Centrifuges Targeted in Natanz facilities. The Institute for International Science and Security (ISIS) wrote in a report that about 1 to 2 units were disabled between November 1 and January.

Although not directly carried out by Germany, the role of German researchers and companies such as Siemens in the discovery and dissemination of vulnerability of the “process control system” (PCS 7) was exploited. National Laboratory Center INL The United States in collaboration with Siemens identified the system’s vulnerabilities in the year, which later in construction Stuxnet Used. This cooperation reflects Western technological complicity to facilitate cyber threats against Iran.

1. Industrial spy and technology deception; Theft of science and restriction of Iran’s growth

In recent decades, Iran has always been the goal of the West’s scientific restriction policies, especially informal paths such as dual research projects and technology espionage. Germany played a role in the transfer of knowledge, while identifying Iranian scientists through cooperation with seemingly international research institutes in the fields of energy, biotechnology and aerospace. Dozens of joint projects in the form of short -term scientific courses were practically used as a cover to gather information about Iran’s internal capabilities in the field of nanotechnology, nuclear medicine and advanced engineering.

In some cases, even after the publication of Iranian articles in European scientific journals, the German government or the European Union has prevented the necessary equipment from entering the investigation under the pretext of sanctions. For example, in year 2, the German Ministry of Economy prevented the TEM electron microscopy from issuing Sharif University of Technology, while the same device was delivered to a Qatari academic entity a few years ago. This dual impact shows that science and technology for Germany is also a tool for geopolitical pressure.

1. The drug boycott and the silent death; German participation in the economic war

While the European Union has always claimed to adhere to the principles of human rights and human considerations, its member states, especially Germany, during unilateral sanctions after the US withdrawal from Brajam, were clearly contradicted. At this point, although pharmaceutical items have been officially announced by the list of sanctions, the fact is that European banks, focusing on German banks under pressure from US Treasury threats, have refused to conduct any financial transactions related to drugs, medical equipment and pharmaceutical raw materials with Iran. This “hidden financial boycott” policy has virtually disrupted Iranian patients’ access to vital drugs, and in the shadow of Berlin’s official silence, it has become a silent tool for pressure on civilian people.

The results of these measures were clearly revealed in crises such as Corona epidemic and in the field of specific patients. According to the official statistics of the Iranian Ministry of Health, in year 3, more than 6,000 specific patients were facing a shortage or lack of drugs, and many of them were endangered. Vaccins needed for children with rare diseases also with Delays They encountered that they were sometimes dead. These humanitarian catastrophes were created not as a result of direct sanctions but as a result of the German government’s passive and conservative companionship with the American pressure structure.

In this case, Germany may not have fired a bullet, but by closing financial and indifferent ways to its consequences, played a more effective role than many weapons; Because the victims were not the military, but the infants, the patients and the elderly.

1. Technological and banking sanctions; German stone -throwing on the path of progress of Iran

Following the unilateral withdrawal of the US nuclear deal and the return of sanctions, the European Union, and especially Germany, as one of the key parties to the Brjam, played an active role in maintaining the path of economic and technical cooperation with Iran, but in practice, the German government not only followed the US pressure, but with its independent banking and restrictions.

As a result, contracts related to technical knowledge transfer, supply of electronic components, industrial software and even technologies related to health and medical equipment were halted. These actions, despite their claim to adhere to the principles of human rights and the humanitarian approach, directly influenced the livelihoods of the Iranian people.

However, the Pressure Policy Technological And the German bank not only led to the weakening of Iran’s vital infrastructure, but it also strengthened the self -sufficiency approach in sensitive areas. In response to these pressures, the Iranian industries, relying on internal capacities and knowledge -based institutions, sought to reduce import dependence and accelerate the path of localization of strategic technologies.

1. The international system and the German silence; Obstacle to the path of Iranian rights

In recent years, Germany has always been one of the most effective actors in the structure of the international system, but its performance towards Iran reflects a fundamental contradiction between legal claims and its political behavior.

In world communities such as the UN Security Council, Germany not only condemned transgressors against Iran, but also paved the way for adoption of biased resolutions or political and economic pressures, with its hostile or purposeful silence.

This companionship with aggression or silence, in the events where Iran was victimized by state terrorism, nuclear sabotage, or the UN Charter’s clear violation of the other countries, actually somehow green lights to continue policies. Unilaterally Turned.

On the other hand, the German government and its European allies have repeatedly refused to officially support Iran’s lawsuits at the International Court of Justice or other legal mechanisms. While Iran has attempted to challenge the Zionist regime’s violations or the illegal departure of the nuclear deal by resorting to legal paths, countries claiming international order, including Germany, have either been silent or even indirectly assumed international violators. This apparent duality in the Berlin approach is evidence that the Western -claimed “international order” is defined not on the basis of justice but on the basis of political interests.