Netanyahu’s goal of war with Iran was to retain power; Decline of American Power – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International Group: Argentina’s geopolitics analyst, Orsola Asta, views the Zionist regime’s actions as part of a broader project to preserve the West’s hegemony and prevent the decline of monopoly order led by the United States. Emphasizing Israel’s political fragility and the bold role of neoconservatives in the US political structure, he believes that warfare and targeted assassinations against Iran, not by security concerns, but to prevent the strengthening of resistance and prevent Tehran from joining global multilateral order. In this conversation, Asta also criticizes the dual standards of international institutions, the West’s silence against war crimes, and the role of the mainstream media in distorting facts, and emphasizing the need to form an independent front to counter the Western domination project. Below, you will read the full text of a dedicated conversation with this Argentine analyst;

In recent days, the world has witnessed the obvious aggressive acts of the Zionist regime against Iran and its people. In your opinion, why does this regime commit such crimes against defenseless civilians in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran? What causes it to continue these aggression, including targeted assassinations?

It can be said that Netanyahu has a variety of reasons to start the war with Iran; The war that has also engulfed the United States, a country that has previously played a role in defense of Israel, but has now entered into military action directly. Among these reasons, Netanyahu’s political and even legal weaknesses, as well as the fragility of his political coalition. From this point of view, Netanyahu seems to regard war as a vital element for maintaining his political power and survival.

On another level, Iran is a serious obstacle to the dream of “Great Israel”. On the other hand, the Trump administration in the United States is facing severe domestic crises, and the bold presence of Zionist and neo -conservative factions in its structure has provided Israel; Because these American currents see the control of the West Asian region as a strategic goal and see Israel not only as an ally, but a key point in achieving that goal.

The Zionist regime claimed to target Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, but in practice bombed hospitals, infrastructure and media centers and were victims of many women and children. How can this contradiction be explained? What is the real purpose of these actions?

Israel has always strived and is still seeking to prevent Tehran and Washington from reaching a nuclear deal in any way possible. Evidence of the sixth round of negotiations that was going on confirms this fact. In addition, it is noteworthy that Israel later tied the claim of preventing Iran from accessing nuclear weapons with the aim of changing the political system in Iran.

Western countries continue to support the regime politically and militarily, despite the documentation of the Zionist regime’s war crimes by the United Nations and human rights institutions. In your opinion, why is the West silent against these crimes?

Netanyahu is well aware that there are neo -conservatives and Zionists who support the “Greater Israel” plan in the Trump administration. Therefore, the main purpose of neo -conservatives in the “New American Century” project is to control West Asia. By realizing this goal, it is possible to rebuild the world’s global superiority. This intention was evident during the Bush administration during the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq and other similar actions.

Pope Francis once said, “We are experiencing World War III, but as part, season -by -season.” To better understand the global situation, it may be necessary to contemplate how these Western circles we are talking about understanding the current changes in the Aphro-Arasia area; An area where the balance of power is gradually changing to the detriment of the West’s geopolitical interests. In such a context, Israel acts as a strong West fortress in the region.

Western media usually reflects the Israeli regime’s actions, while ignoring civilians in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran, as well as assassination operations. How do you evaluate this media bias and what is the way to deal with it?

The legendary iron dome has proven not invincible. Now a strange paradox is formed: those who claim to have won the war cannot celebrate in their land and face pain and mourning instead.

The media cannot be understood outside this field of struggle. Where I answer, South America is a hemisphere dominated by American and British narratives. However, despite the dominance of large media, there are always alternative media sources that participate in a different perspective and are looking for information more accurately to balance the mainstream media.

Perhaps because of the advancement of information and communication technologies, we now have more access to the news of mass killings that are being published on social media. Some of the narratives that deny these events, especially when consider the severe human crisis of people like the inhabitants of Gaza, seem very nasty.

In your opinion, what is the long -term goal of the Zionist regime for these aggressive and developmental policies? What is the threat of these ambitions for its neighbors in the region?

As mentioned earlier, the balance of power in the Middle East is changing to the detriment of Western geopolitical interests. The region is increasingly inclined to the emerging world, such as the Brix Group, which is a challenge for Israel, a country that pursues offensive policies.

For example, the importance of the Iranian -Saudi diplomatic agreement and the prominent role of China in facilitating it is significant. Also, Iran, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates have joined the Brix group, and Saudi Arabia is determining its position on the group. Türkiye is also active as one of the Brix partners. In addition, there is a comprehensive strategic agreement between Iran and Russia as well as Iran’s contracts with China on infrastructure, industry and oil. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) also plays a role.

For this reason, the region, which has always been one of the world’s vital logistical centers and a major producer of hydrocarbons and oil, seeks to play a role in the structure of the modern world order. On the contrary, Israel, which is in line with the Western neocons, seems to be determined to move towards the war to stop these trends.

What is your reaction to this regime’s recent attacks on Iran and the killing of civilians? What message do you have for people?

I condemn the killings, and I believe that when discussing geopolitical events, focusing on human aspects is critical because here is talking about human lives and each of them is valuable. The moral dimension of any regional redevelopment in the strategic calculations of those seeking war is absent, and the counting of human victims continues at the same time. As such, huge hypocrisy is clearly revealed.

As it happened about the death of civilians in Iran, the catastrophic and genocide situation in the Gaza Strip must cause a global reaction. Israel’s decision to block human aid is another form of war. Even many reporters have been killed again to hide information and distort the true narrative.

The United States is constantly vetoing UN resolutions that condemn the crimes of the Zionist regime. Do you think US policies are the basis for the continuation of these aggression? How can both regimens be held?

Israel acts as the stronghold of the Western political geography in the region. The full understanding of the dynamics of vetoes in the United Nations is not possible regardless of this wider image; An image that illustrates the reality of the decline of US economic and military power. It also helps to explain US policies such as tariffs, increased tensions with China, dramatically increasing military funding, and trying to expand the budget within NATO.

If we start with the hypothesis of a hybrid and scattered World War, there are key elements that are in line with the logic of the decline of American hegemony, and Israel’s support is in fact the United States itself. Multiplayer is no longer just a wish, but now an operational reality. America -led monopoly order is collapsing not only because of the emergence of competing powers but also because of its internal contradictions and the extent of the imperialist that has been identified in recent decades.

The Zionist regime has illegal nuclear weapons outside the International Atomic Energy Agency’s supervision, but is attacking Iran by claiming nuclear concerns. Isn’t this a clear example of dual standards in global norms? How should the international community deal with this hypocrisy?

Iran has been the main enemy of Israel in the region since the Islamic Revolution. As mentioned earlier, Israel is determined to prevent the nuclear deal between Iran and the United States at any cost. In fact, in year 2, the United States withdrew from multilateral negotiations that included other countries on Iran’s nuclear development policy. Obviously there is a significant contradiction; Israel is not under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, while other countries are under surveillance.

At this stage, it is imperative that the performance of the international mechanisms created after World War II. The new era that is being formed from current geopolitical issues directly refers to this issue and should not be overlooked.

I re -raise this last point because of its importance in any serious debate about the international community and its hypocrisy. In this regard, at least 5 large areas in the world are witnessing major clashes that are somehow related and are all located in Eurasia.

As mentioned earlier, key developments are in line with the general logic of the decline of American hegemony. This includes all the things we have said about West Asia or the Middle East, Ukraine and NATO’s confrontation with problems in the war with Russia and the increased tensions between the US and China over Taiwan. Although important developments are taking place in Africa and Latin America, focusing on Eurasian areas is due to the direct involvement of the great powers and their importance in the formation of the future world order.