Netanyahu’s goal of war with Iran was to retain power; Decline of American Power – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: Argeina’s geopolitics analyst, Orsola Asta, views the Zionist regime’s actions as part of a broader project to preserve the West’s hegemony and preve the decline of monopoly order led by the United States. Emphasizing Israel’s political fragility and the bold role of neoconservatives in the US political structure, he believes that warfare and targeted assassinations against Iran, not by security concerns, but to preve the strengthening of resistance and preve Tehran from joining global multilateral order. In this conversation, Asta also criticizes the dual standards of iernational institutions, the West’s silence against war crimes, and the role of the mainstream media in distorting facts, and emphasizing the need to form an independe fro to couer the Western domination project. Below, you will read the full text of a dedicated conversation with this Argeine analyst;

In rece days, the world has witnessed the obvious aggressive acts of the Zionist regime against Iran and its people. In your opinion, why does this regime commit such crimes against defenseless civilians in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran? What causes it to coinue these aggression, including targeted assassinations?

It can be said that Netanyahu has a variety of reasons to start the war with Iran; The war that has also engulfed the United States, a coury that has previously played a role in defense of Israel, but has now eered io military action directly. Among these reasons, Netanyahu’s political and even legal weaknesses, as well as the fragility of his political coalition. From this poi of view, Netanyahu seems to regard war as a vital eleme for maiaining his political power and survival.

On another level, Iran is a serious obstacle to the dream of “Great Israel”. On the other hand, the Trump administration in the United States is facing severe domestic crises, and the bold presence of Zionist and neo -conservative factions in its structure has provided Israel; Because these American curres see the corol of the West Asian region as a strategic goal and see Israel not only as an ally, but a key poi in achieving that goal.

The Zionist regime claimed to target Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, but in practice bombed hospitals, infrastructure and media ceers and were victims of many women and children. How can this coradiction be explained? What is the real purpose of these actions?

Israel has always strived and is still seeking to preve Tehran and Washington from reaching a nuclear deal in any way possible. Evidence of the sixth round of negotiations that was going on confirms this fact. In addition, it is noteworthy that Israel later tied the claim of preveing Iran from accessing nuclear weapons with the aim of changing the political system in Iran.

Western couries coinue to support the regime politically and militarily, despite the documeation of the Zionist regime’s war crimes by the United Nations and human rights institutions. In your opinion, why is the West sile against these crimes?

Netanyahu is well aware that there are neo -conservatives and Zionists who support the “Greater Israel” plan in the Trump administration. Therefore, the main purpose of neo -conservatives in the “New American Ceury” project is to corol West Asia. By realizing this goal, it is possible to rebuild the world’s global superiority. This ieion was evide during the Bush administration during the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq and other similar actions.

Pope Francis once said, “We are experiencing World War III, but as part, season -by -season.” To better understand the global situation, it may be necessary to coemplate how these Western circles we are talking about understanding the curre changes in the Aphro-Arasia area; An area where the balance of power is gradually changing to the detrime of the West’s geopolitical ierests. In such a coext, Israel acts as a strong West fortress in the region.

Western media usually reflects the Israeli regime’s actions, while ignoring civilians in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran, as well as assassination operations. How do you evaluate this media bias and what is the way to deal with it?

The legendary iron dome has proven not invincible. Now a strange paradox is formed: those who claim to have won the war cannot celebrate in their land and face pain and mourning instead.

The media cannot be understood outside this field of struggle. Where I answer, South America is a hemisphere dominated by American and British narratives. However, despite the dominance of large media, there are always alternative media sources that participate in a differe perspective and are looking for information more accurately to balance the mainstream media.

Perhaps because of the advanceme of information and communication technologies, we now have more access to the news of mass killings that are being published on social media. Some of the narratives that deny these eves, especially when consider the severe human crisis of people like the inhabitas of Gaza, seem very nasty.

In your opinion, what is the long -term goal of the Zionist regime for these aggressive and developmeal policies? What is the threat of these ambitions for its neighbors in the region?

As meioned earlier, the balance of power in the Middle East is changing to the detrime of Western geopolitical ierests. The region is increasingly inclined to the emerging world, such as the Brix Group, which is a challenge for Israel, a coury that pursues offensive policies.

For example, the importance of the Iranian -Saudi diplomatic agreeme and the promine role of China in facilitating it is significa. Also, Iran, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates have joined the Brix group, and Saudi Arabia is determining its position on the group. Türkiye is also active as one of the Brix partners. In addition, there is a comprehensive strategic agreeme between Iran and Russia as well as Iran’s coracts with China on infrastructure, industry and oil. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) also plays a role.

For this reason, the region, which has always been one of the world’s vital logistical ceers and a major producer of hydrocarbons and oil, seeks to play a role in the structure of the modern world order. On the corary, Israel, which is in line with the Western neocons, seems to be determined to move towards the war to stop these trends.

What is your reaction to this regime’s rece attacks on Iran and the killing of civilians? What message do you have for people?

I condemn the killings, and I believe that when discussing geopolitical eves, focusing on human aspects is critical because here is talking about human lives and each of them is valuable. The moral dimension of any regional redevelopme in the strategic calculations of those seeking war is abse, and the couing of human victims coinues at the same time. As such, huge hypocrisy is clearly revealed.

As it happened about the death of civilians in Iran, the catastrophic and genocide situation in the Gaza Strip must cause a global reaction. Israel’s decision to block human aid is another form of war. Even many reporters have been killed again to hide information and distort the true narrative.

The United States is constaly vetoing UN resolutions that condemn the crimes of the Zionist regime. Do you think US policies are the basis for the coinuation of these aggression? How can both regimens be held?

Israel acts as the stronghold of the Western political geography in the region. The full understanding of the dynamics of vetoes in the United Nations is not possible regardless of this wider image; An image that illustrates the reality of the decline of US economic and military power. It also helps to explain US policies such as tariffs, increased tensions with China, dramatically increasing military funding, and trying to expand the budget within NATO.

If we start with the hypothesis of a hybrid and scattered World War, there are key elemes that are in line with the logic of the decline of American hegemony, and Israel’s support is in fact the United States itself. Multiplayer is no longer just a wish, but now an operational reality. America -led monopoly order is collapsing not only because of the emergence of competing powers but also because of its iernal coradictions and the exte of the imperialist that has been ideified in rece decades.

The Zionist regime has illegal nuclear weapons outside the Iernational Atomic Energy Agency’s supervision, but is attacking Iran by claiming nuclear concerns. Isn’t this a clear example of dual standards in global norms? How should the iernational community deal with this hypocrisy?

Iran has been the main enemy of Israel in the region since the Islamic Revolution. As meioned earlier, Israel is determined to preve the nuclear deal between Iran and the United States at any cost. In fact, in year 2, the United States withdrew from multilateral negotiations that included other couries on Iran’s nuclear developme policy. Obviously there is a significa coradiction; Israel is not under the supervision of the Iernational Atomic Energy Agency, while other couries are under surveillance.

At this stage, it is imperative that the performance of the iernational mechanisms created after World War II. The new era that is being formed from curre geopolitical issues directly refers to this issue and should not be overlooked.

I re -raise this last poi because of its importance in any serious debate about the iernational community and its hypocrisy. In this regard, at least 5 large areas in the world are witnessing major clashes that are somehow related and are all located in Eurasia.

As meioned earlier, key developmes are in line with the general logic of the decline of American hegemony. This includes all the things we have said about West Asia or the Middle East, Ukraine and NATO’s confroation with problems in the war with Russia and the increased tensions between the US and China over Taiwan. Although importa developmes are taking place in Africa and Latin America, focusing on Eurasian areas is due to the direct involveme of the great powers and their importance in the formation of the future world order.