British security and military advisers against Iran and Russia

According to RCO News Agency, Fiona Hill, a British defense adviser and one of the three authors of the Strategic Defense Document, claimed that Russia had entered the war with Britain, the United States is no longer a reliable ally for its country, and London should be more coherent and flexible to respond to threats.

“We are plagued by a relatively big problem,” said Fiona Hill, who was a senior adviser to Russia’s strategic document in Russian affairs. “We have been caught in a predicament between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, who is extremely unpredictable.”

“Russia has become a more stubborn competitor in ways we probably did not fully predict,” the London government adviser said, saying, “Russia has become a more stubborn competitor. “Vladimir Putin has looked at the Ukrainian war as a starting point for Moscow into a dominant military power throughout Europe.”

“Russia has threatened Britain in the context of a long -term effort, including poisoning, assassination, subversive operations, all kinds of cyber attacks and infiltration operations,” he said.

He also accused Russia of “implementing sensors around the vital pipelines and trying to destroy submarine cables.”

Russia has entered the war with the British

The British defense adviser once again claimed that “Russia has entered the war with us, noting that he had made a similar alleged alert in his book on Putin. We had already said that Putin had declared war to the West. At that time, other experts opposed it, but events showed that he did so and we didn’t pay attention to it. “For the Russian president, the war in Ukraine was part of a proxy war with the United States, and in this way China has led North Korea and Iran to join the war.”

“Putin believes that Ukraine is now abandoning relations with the United States,” said Fiona Hill about the policies of Donald Trump’s administration. “Trump is really seeking to establish separate relationships with Putin aimed at concluding arms and business control agreements that may make those around them richer, though Putin no longer needs to become richer.”

Hill continued in the interview that the parasite could no longer rely on the US military umbrella, like the Cold War, the next generation, and at least as before. In his view, “Britain has to manage its number one allies, and the challenge is not to react strongly because it does not want to cut off relations.”

According to the Guardian newspaper, Fiona Hill’s thinking is reflected in the British Strategic Defense Review Document published a few days ago; The document stated: “Britain’s long -standing hypotheses about the structures and balances of global power are no longer sure.” This is a rare acknowledgment in a British government document that the phenomenon of Trumpism has affected reliable foreign policy hypotheses.

The consultant also said that Britain needs “more internal cohesion” to protect itself. “We can’t rely on anyone exclusively,” he said. “Britain needs a different mentality that is equally based on traditional defense and social flexibility.”

Iran and Russia are looking to exploit disputes in the West

Meanwhile, another British government security adviser claimed a similar hostile position against Iran and Russia, claiming that the two countries were paying money to “criminals inside the UK to take violent, espionage and intimidation.”

Jonathan Hall, senior adviser to the British Government in the field of terrorism and government threats in an interview with the New York Times, claimed that the case filed in British courts confirmed that “Russia and Iran seek to exploit disputes in the West to hire a social media officer.”

“Iran -Russia’s efforts to commit hostile actions on British soil have created an extraordinary level of threat, but it is harder to understand the threat to the general public than to understand terrorism,” he said, noting that he cannot argue about these criminal cases.

“Terrorism is something that attracts public attention to death, and destruction and chaos, but for the general public it is much harder to understand government threats,” he explained.

Jonathan Hall, a former lawyer and prosecutor specializing in international crime and security, was employed by the London government to review the British anti -terrorism laws and was designated as a consultant in government threats.

Last October, the British Internal Intelligence Service claimed that Russian intelligence agents had a mission on the British and European streets last October.

The British Foreign Intelligence Service Richard Moore, the British Foreign Intelligence Service, recently said Russian intelligence services were “wild.”

“The most prominent trend in recent years is the use of criminal groups organized by foreign powers because various waves of diplomats were fired from the UK, so these governments can no longer use diplomatic intelligence officers to strengthen and coordinate,” Jonathan Hall said.

While accusing Iran and Russia of “paying money to domestic criminals to carry out violent acts, espionage and intimidation on British soil, he claimed:” Russia and Iran also use the Internet to find unhappy people in Britain and the United States, hire or influence them, while each country is in space. »

The end of the message