Iran’s complai of IAEA baseless allegations
Iran has rejected the agency’s claims about “espionage” by publishing a legal note. Tehran believes that the agency goes beyond its authority and is acting on fabricated evidence against Iran.
According to a legal note that was distributed a few days before a key meeting in Vienna, Iran has iensified its treatme of the UN nuclear monitoring body by accusing agency inspectors of slandering and providing unnecessary evidence.
In this regard, the Bloomberg News Network wrote in a report: “This note shows that tensions between Tehran and the Iernational Atomic Energy Agency are on the eve of the June 6 meeting, where Western couries may refer to the Security Council for failing to comply with iernational sanctuaries.”
According to the report, the tension comes as Iran -US negotiations to resolve the Tehran nuclear issue have been “barrier” due to a major dispute over the Islamic Republic’s legal right to enrich uranium.
In the first detailed analysis of the IAEA inspection report on May 5, Iran Rafael Grossi accused the Agency’s Director General of distorting Iran’s activities with inaccurate and repetitive information.
According to Iran’s 2 -page analysis on June 6, inspectors have used the slander language and claimed that Iran has recorded confideial documes belonging to the Agency inspectors.
The agency, in a secret report by Bloomberg, sparked Iran’s anger: “Curre evidence of the active collection and analysis of highly confideial documes belonging to the agency by Iran raises serious concerns about Iran’s cooperation morale and may effectively impleme the sanctions in Iran.”
According to the US media, a spokesman for the agency refused to provide further details about the nature of “missing documes” or their coe.
Meanwhile, former head of the agency’s nuclear policy -making policy, Tariq Royof, said: “It is unprecedeed for the Agency to admit in a report that it has lost corol of information. “Now it seems that Iran has increased its protest and says the Director General has gone beyond its authority.”
“The deteriorating relationship between the agency and Iran is a negative sign of diplomatic reconciliation,” Bloomberg writes.
IAEA inspectors coinue to visit Iran’s announced nuclear sites daily and will have a key role in the verification of Iran if agreed between Iran and the United States.
In the absence of progress in the IAEA research, European couries have announced that they are ready to return Iran to the UN Security Council, where widespread iernational sanctions could be re -imposed against Iran before the end of October. Iran has warned that, if referred to the Security Council, it may be withdrawn from the Nuclear Weapons Corast (NPT).
“If these couries decide to abuse Iran’s patience and insist on their wrong path, Iran will have to make appropriate decisions in accordance with the conditions and actions of the other parties,” Iran wrote in a note to the agency members.
Earlier, Sayed Abbas Arakchi, head of the Iranian diplomatic apparatus, emphasized that “IAEA reports should be technical and non -political,” said “I announced my displeasure with the agency’s rece report in Cairo.”
The head of the Iranian diplomatic apparatus further urged the region to support Oman’s mediation for negotiations aimed at achieving a diplomatic solution. “If the Americans insist on zero enrichme, we will not be able to agree, but if the goal is to fail to access nuclear weapons, it is possible,” Arakchi said.
The end of the message
(tagstotranslate) Rafael Grossi (T) Iernational Atomic Energy Agency (T) Iran
