A Hamas Leader: We did not reject the “Steve Whitakaf” offer

According to RCO News Agency, al -Miyadin Network reported, Bassem Naeem, one of the leaders of Hamas, emphasized: Witcaf proposed the other party’s response to the proposal. This response did not match any of the things we agreed and did not meet the demands of our people at least.

Bassem Naeem added: “However, considering the horror of our people, we dealt with it positively and with a lot of responsibility and responded to him to minimum fulfill our desires.”

The Hamas leader emphasized: “We demanded guaraees for the enemy to respect the temporary (6 -day) ceasefire and allow sufficie humanitarian aid.”

Naim said: “We called for the guaraees that lead to the end of the war and the withdrawal of enemy forces.” Why is the Israeli response always considered the only answer to negotiation? This violates the iegrity and fairness of mediation and is completely biased in the ierest of the other party.

Bassem Naeem added: “What Witcaf has in response to our proposal that we agreed with him about a week ago is the temporary ceasefire for 5 days, but without any guaraee that the enemy adheres to it (because he was to deliver his captives in the first week).

“The occupiers wa humanitarian aid to eer their own schedule, not as before March 5, according to the January 9 agreeme (we are obliged to legitimize militarization of aid and help the occupiers in their displaceme plan),” the Hamas leader coinued.

According to the Hamas leader, the occupiers wa to negotiate with their new military presence (which supports the corol and authority of the occupiers in the Gaza Strip) about the retreat plans agreed on January 5.

Bassem Naeem emphasized: There is absolutely no guaraee for the ceasefire and the withdrawal of enemy forces at the end of the negotiations (because it is about re -establishme and security arrangemes in the Gaza Strip)

The end of the message