Sullivan: A possible Tehran -Washington agreement will be very similar to Brajam

Former US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan praised US President Donald Trump’s strategy of engaging with Iran on its nuclear program and predicted that the Trump administration would reach an agreement that would be “very similar to the Year 2 nuclear deal” (Brajam).

Joyish Insider News reported that Sullivan, who had a background in nuclear negotiations with Iran, attended the podcast in response to how Trump’s diplomacy with Iran after leaving Brajam in his first presidency, cited Trump’s worst in the past.

Sullivan said: “The humor is not hidden for me that they are now negotiating for an agreement that will be very similar to the brigade.” I haven’t talked to any of the Trump administration officials and I don’t know if they are in contact with other designers or negotiators of the Obama era. Part of this is because, although they are partially followed by the Brjam pattern, they want to get rid of it and say, “Any agreement Trump has achieved will be much better than the Obama agreement.” Seeing how they want to make this claim will be very interesting to me.

Iran and the United States have so far conducted five rounds of indirect talks with Oman’s mediation and have agreed to continue the negotiations. However, the details of the sixth round of the talks have not yet been announced.

The parties generally evaluated the process of the negotiations and said Muscat has made suggestions in this round of negotiations to resolve disputes in the positions of the parties.

The US president recently said of an agreement with Iran: “I think we are close to the agreement with Iran and I think this will happen in the not too distant future.”

The problem of uranium enrichment and disputes within the Republican Party

The former US national security adviser said that it is monitoring the public developments of current talks on the issue of uranium enrichment, saying that the issue “has brought the negotiations to a deadlock and explicitly created a major war within the Republican Party.”

“I have always thought that a diplomatic solution to limit Iran’s nuclear program is the best way,” Sullivan said, referring to the danger of “possible retaliatory action against Israel and the US in the region”. In this case, unlike many other foreign policy issues, it seems that Donald Trump and I are competing.

US officials, especially after the third round of negotiations, claimed that Iran had no right to enrich and if it wants to use nuclear energy, it could import the fuel needed by its reactors from a third country.

Although Iranian officials have emphasized that Iran’s possession of peaceful nuclear energy and the right to enrich Iran is not negotiating, and Iran will strongly defend its peaceful nuclear program against any transgressor.

Trump’s approach to the Zionist regime and regional partners

Responding to why Trump did not go to the occupied territories on his recent trip to West Asia and whether his overall approach to the privilege of Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shows that former US President Joe Biden’s government should also have a strict stance on the regime.

“Donald Trump is interested in peace and deal,” he explained. This is his main approach in the region. He looks at Netanyahu and asks, “Does the BBC allow me to make peace or deal? No. Does Mohammed bin Salman (Saudi Crown Prince) do this? Yes. Does Muhammad ibn Zayed (the Emirates President) do so? Yes. Even the Iranians may do so. Or may the Houthis (Yemen Ansarullah) refuse to deal. So I think he has actually come to the conclusion that Netanyahu can be a partner in his goals, namely reduced tension and transaction. And since he has seen the answer negatively, he preferred to act independently.

Sullivan continued: “This means that he is willing to sign an agreement with the Houthis that at the same time puts them in a position to continue to attack Israel and threaten Israeli -related ships.” It may also agree with Iran despite Israel’s concerns. And of course, it seeks huge economic deals with Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Biden and Trump’s approach to the Persian Gulf states

Referring to the partnerships of the Biden government with the Saudis and the Emirates, Sullivan argued that the Biden government “provided the ground for strengthening relations with the Persian Gulf”.

“In some cases, such as artificial intelligence and technology issues, for example, on the restrictions on chips sent to these countries, our approach was different,” said a former US national security adviser. But in essence, the idea of ​​creating technology participation between the United Arab Emirates and the United States, or between the US and Saudi Arabia, was also part of the Biden’s approach. So I don’t think there is much difference in this regard.

Netanyahu’s opposition to Trump over Iran’s nuclear issue

Responding to a question about what the possible Zionist invasion of Iran’s nuclear program without Trump’s approval of Iran’s nuclear program, the US National Security Adviser rejected the possibility that Netanyahu wanted to act contrary to the US president’s will.

Sullivan said: “I doubt that the Prime Minister Netanyahu will take action, unlike Trump’s desire.” In my opinion, it is very unlikely that an Israeli prime minister would order an attack while the US president has explicitly forbidden him, especially for the president, and at this time, when the United States is in diplomatic negotiations with Iran to reach some kind of agreement.

Recently, Axius news agency quoted a White House official as saying: “Trump, in his contact with Netanyahu, told him that he did not want any action to prevent a diplomatic solution with Iran.

The official told the American news site that Trump’s message was that he did not want to hostile to Netanyahu when he was trying to solve problems.

The end of the message