Sullivan: The Trump administration will not miss the opportunity to agree with Iran

Former White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan spoke in an interview with an UAE media about issues related to Tehran-Washington negotiations as well as the Ukrainian war and the West Asian region.

Sullivan, who spoke to the National Magazine, responded to the question of how much Iran is ready to reach an agreement with the United States on the nuclear issue, saying that Iran is in any way possible that it wants to reach an agreement. The main question is what the form of this agreement will be, especially the state of Iran’s enrichment. I think there will be intensive talks between Iran and Trump and intensive discussions in the Trump administration.

In response to him, in response to whether this would cause a dispute among Trump’s republican and troubled Republicans, he explained that “in recent weeks we have seen a number of Republicans opposed any agreement with Iran that do not include its nuclear program,” which would not be a tribute to Iran. We have to wait for the result, but I think this government has been flexible to some of the hard -line Republicans. “

In another part of the conversation, Sullivan, referring to the impact of regional developments on OPEC and world oil prices, said: “We have seen a decline in oil prices, which I think will be lower if agreed with Iran.”

Responding to what the deepest lessons of Iran’s agreement was to know what time was really in our favor, according to the White House official, in response to what a deepest lesson process for Iran’s agreement was to know. Iran is really under pressure and we do not have to rush to reach an agreement. On the other hand, there must be a balance between this and taking advantage of the opportunity. Maintaining this balance is the most important issue. If they could reach an agreement with Iran, I will support it, as I would support the previous agreement that Trump left.

Iran and the US have so far conducted four rounds of indirect talks with Oman’s mediation to address the issue of Iran’s nuclear program. The parties generally evaluate the process of these negotiations well and say that useful ideas have been discussed during the conversations and that the negotiations have gone away from the generalities.

In the meantime, US officials, especially after the third round of negotiations, claimed that Iran, as the only nuclear country without a nuclear weapon, has no right to enrich the nuclear weapons, and that if it wants to use nuclear energy, it could import the fuel needed by its reactors from a third country.

Iranian Foreign Minister Sayed Abbas Arakchi said yesterday that “we have seen positions from the Americans in the past few days that are not compatible with any logic and that negotiations are having trouble”, saying that this is why we have not yet determined the next round of negotiations. A history has been proposed for negotiations, but we have not yet accepted.

Russia is looking for time!

In response to the question, Sullivan responded to the question of what the best scenario can be found for Ukraine in the worst circumstances? Come.

In an interview with the National Emirati newspaper, Sullivan did not reject the issue of Ukraine’s territorial privileges, and said: “I think this is possible, although there may be talks on territorial issues between Ukraine and Russia.” The United States must put more pressure on Russia to achieve this result, as Vladimir Putin thinks this war is victorious.

Asked whether he wants Putin to prolong the war and how he is going to accompany US President Donald Trump, he said: “If Putin could put his talk, he would continue to put in the forefront of Ukraine’s missile and missile attacks.”

“On the other hand, he does not want to lose and back Trump,” he said. He has to declare somewhat for peace and has done so with Istanbul’s talks. I think he is going to tell President Trump, “I also want peace but conditions that have to be fulfilled”, that is, the impossible conditions they set for Ukraine, then he will take time with diplomatic process and continue the battle on the other hand, but he will succeed.

Responding to a question about Ukraine’s deterrence on future Russian attacks on any peace agreement, Sullivan said: “This is really the case, but not in the form of security guarantees (NATO) that President Trump (threatening) has refused, but in the form of continuous Western support for Ukraine.” This is possible.

“The agreement was more symbolic and indicative of the current president’s emphasis that the United States was receiving anything in exchange for assistance to Ukraine,” he said of the US mineral agreement with Ukraine, where Kiev could offset the cost of US military and financial assistance to Washington. I think this agreement is not much to be related to the future of Ukraine or the United States.

European and Ukrainian leaders had previously offered a 2 -day -old ceasefire. Russian President Vladimir Putin rejected the proposal and made a proposal to begin peace talks in Türkiye. They had warned of widespread and coordinated sanctions against the United States against Russia if the ceasefire was not implemented.

The Ukrainian and Russian delegations in Istanbul on Friday, May 5, resulted in an agreement on the widespread exchange of prisoners of war and the exchange of proposals for ceasefire and peace.

Trump leads his agenda without coordination with Netanyahu

Sullivan said about how he assesses US President Donald Trump’s recent trip to the region, saying that his performance was “bold and fast”: I disagree with some of his actions but I agree with others. For example, I agree with his attempt to promote indirect talks with Iran on a nuclear deal that will probably look like an agreement that President Barack Obama made. But another issue that was really interesting to me was part of his remarks that “I do not enter the region through Israel, but I enter it through the Gulf states because I see peace partners in these countries, but I do not see much in Israel.” It was an impressive and unexpected moment for me.

The White House official said in response to the question of whether we are seeing a change in power in the region in a way that the Persian Gulf states would be superior to the Zionist regime, saying that he did not comment on the balance of power, but in his view, the Gulf states, such as the Gulf, are in the field of economic growth.

Responding to another question about Saudi Arabia’s prominent position on the trip, especially when Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was honored by Trump, he said: “I think President Trump’s method in diplomacy is very personal, and this is clearly related to the Saudi Crown Prince. He (Trump) was honored with the official ceremony and somehow offset it. The point is that we are confronted with two persons whose performance is based on personalized diplomacy.

Sullivan also responded to Zionist Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, according to this trip, saying: “I think he has basically told BBC” Whatever you want to do in Gaza in Gaza, “said Sullivan. But I think his main message is, “You’re not going to do what you want to do, and I don’t necessarily have to listen to me when you make advice on different parts of West Asian politics.”

Sullivan’s statements, while the Biden government is accused of assisting the genocide in Gaza by the Zionist regime.

Responding to a question about whether US negotiations with Iran and Hamas, former US national security adviser, said: “I think his message is that he is advancing his agenda on Syria, Iran and the Gulf states, and if Israel wants to be part of it, there is no problem.” I think the deal is not the right word in the bottleneck, but I think his clear message is that he is going to continue his work without having to feel in harmony with the Israeli prime minister.

The need to exert pressure on Tel Aviv to continue humanitarian aid to Gaza

In another part of the interview, Sullivan has claimed that the Zionist regime had been prevented from coming to the area after the first phase of the ceasefire and the exchange of prisoners in the past weeks after the end of the first phase of the ceasefire and exchanges, claiming that there was a lot of work to do so in the previous US administration. It is necessary to put pressure on the Israelis to allow human aid. You have to see if these aids are going. “

Responding to what the US government’s “direct” negotiations with Hamas concluded, the former US national security adviser pointed out that the release of US citizen Adhan Alexander from Gaza over the past few days has been the result of the negotiations that have been held in Biden’s government, and he seems to be the result of direct negotiations with Hamas.

Serious damage to Trump’s government policy to the US alliance network

“There is no doubt that the government has damaged the US alliance network, which was the foundation of our sovereignty in the world,” said a former US national security adviser in response to the fact that the Trump administration had damaged the country’s defense hegemony. This is a real and significant damage, especially in the field of transcontinence. A year ago we were talking to Europe about the decline in China’s dangers, but now they are talking about reducing American dangers, including in the field of defense industry. This is a real damage and we have to face it, because if it was only one thing Beijing has been hope over the past few years, it would have been the weakening of American alliances. Unfortunately, without Beijing, US policy has helped this problem.

The end of the message