Influencers that support US agreement with Iran

According to RCO News Agency, Ben Armbrosts, editor -in -chief of the Rispanibele Stit Kraft analytics base, Queen’s Thought, reports on iernal opposition to Donald Trump’s approach to resolving the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, written by Neokans and their allies in the Nonokan and their allies. Its nuclear is raised, but there is really no reason for Trump to pay atteion to them or take them seriously.

The analytical report, referring to the rece Republican Congress letter to the US Preside and calling for any agreeme that does not include Iran’s nuclear program, said: “Andrew Dei, a senior secretary of the American Conzroto Analytical Base, says” all Republican senators have been appoied by the Republican. It is Iran. “They know that this request is unacceptable for the Iranian governme, and they are hoping to sabotage Trump’s diplomatic efforts.”

Sina Tusi, an expert in the Iernational Politics School, described the letter as “negotiation trap”.

“The request for zero enrichme, permane restrictions and complete dismale of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure after the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal is not the stance of negotiations,” he said.

The ideas of the ai -agreeme coalition with Iran do not wa outside Washington and Israel

The other oppones of the agreeme say Iran can maiain its peaceful nuclear program for the goals of nuclear energy production by not enriching its uranium. The good News for Trump and the rest of those who see the negotiations as an opportunity to limit Iran’s nuclear program and avoid war is that the ai -agreeme with Iran outside Washington and the occupied territories does not wa to ignore their request by the US preside or at least a political cost.

For example, a rece poll in collaboration with the University of Maryland has shown that most Americans prefer a 5 % “agreeme with Iran to limit its nuclear program to peaceful goals with stubborn surveys” to military action. But perhaps most importaly, the 5 perce of Trump’s represeatives agreed with the idea.

Oppones of diplomacy with Iran are trying to disrupt this fact and complicate the situation. For example, Zionist Lobby CEO Mark de Bowitz, a “Defense Defense Foundation, who has been trying to change Iran for about two decades, conducted a poll last week showing” 5 % of Americans believe that Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities should be destroyed. “

However, here we find that Iran does not have atomic weapons or nuclear weapons program, and therefore does not have a nuclear weapons, it is a fact that the American ielligence community has acknowledged in its numerous reports.

Support for agreeme with Iran

Armbrusters wrote: Only the American people or the Republican Party do not support Trump’s agreeme with Iran, but some of the promine figures of the Maga moveme with the slogan “First America” ​​and “Great to America” ​​are also supported.

Trump’s senior adviser Steve Benn, who is now supporters and close to him, described the support of the US agreeme with Iran as “rational”.

In addition, Marjari Taylor Green, who has a significa influence on Trump’s supporters’ base, has recely taken a strong stand against the war with Iran. “There is no gap between the supporters’ base and the preside,” he said. “The gap between Congress and the Conservative Republicans is on the agenda of the preside.”

Tucker Carlson, a promine conservative media figure, like Bennin, has a close relationship with Trump and influenced by Trump’s supporters, has criticized Neok and others who wa to destroy Trump’s diplomacy and move toward war. “Thousands of Americans are killed,” he said last moh. We lose the next war. Nothing will be more devastating for our coury. Everyone is looking for a conflict with Iran, it is not an American ally, but is an enemy.

“There are people in Washington, in the Peagon and within the governme who wa to attack Iran,” said Charlie Kirk. Often, they say it will be easy; Only one attack and then exit. But how many times have they been right about “fast attack and exit”? Has that happened at all?

“Preside Trump has significaly consolidated his power in the Republican Party and can certainly sign a good agreeme with Iran without political damage,” says Brian Di. The supporters of the supporters still love him, and the conservative lawmakers and media are afraid of him. The elites also surrender to the fears of the Maga Moveme.

Change the view of regional partners towards agreeme with Iran

Referring to the approach of the regional couries towards Tehran-Washington negotiations, the author said: Another poi that may be overlooked but as importa is the change of regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, which was heavily promoted at the time of the nuclear deal in Barack Obama’s governme, but now in the governme.

“Gulf leaders have generally supported the negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran, because they do not wa to exchange possible fires if they fail,” said Ali Vaez, an expert in the Iernational Crisis Group expert. This support does not necessarily mean success in the negotiations, but it is a change of time.

In the final part of the report, the Calci Dionport of members of the Arms Corol Association recely wrote “Zero enrichme” stance not only brought Iran out of the negotiating table, but does not require any effective agreeme and does not address all parts of Iran. “The dismaling of nuclear infrastructure does not destroy the knowledge that Iran has acquired in enriching uranium.”

Iran and the United States have so far conducted four rounds of indirect talks with Oman’s mediation to address the issue of Iran’s nuclear program. The parties generally evaluated the process of these negotiations well and said that useful ideas were discussed during the conversations and that the negotiations were out of the general. According to Iran, the fourth round is set and will be confirmed after some investigations and will be announced soon.

Iranian officials have emphasized that Iran’s possession of peaceful nuclear energy and the right to enrich Iran is not negotiating, and that Iran will strongly defend its peaceful nuclear program against any aggressive action.

In the meaime, US officials, especially after the third round of negotiations, claimed that Iran, as the only nuclear coury without a nuclear weapon, has no right to enrich the nuclear weapons, and that if it was to use nuclear energy, it could import the fuel needed by its reactors from a third coury.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baqaei said in a news conference on the issue of enrichme on Monday: “We are not allowed to enrich inside Iranian soil, and the United States is not in a position to issue a license on the right of a coury in the prohibition treaty.” It is a conscious and distorted public opinion that every coury is seeking enrichme is seeking unnecessary goals, because there are couries that do enrichme but do not have nuclear weapons.

Baqa’i reiterated that “Iran’s nuclear program is completely peaceful and the issue of enrichme is also recognized in the prohibition treaty,” Baqa’i said, “On the other hand, you cannot, while your ally in the region has no weapons of mass and nuclear killings and takes no occupation. Have to close its nuclear program. This is an irrational and illegal request.

The end of the message