According to Mehr corresponde, Dr. Khadijeh, apart from the 25th anniversary of the Iranian Science Promotion Association, referring to the institutional divide in science policy in Iran, said: “In planning, manageme and evaluation and promotional activities, we are faced with the structural absence of women, and this is not just a statistical vacuum.
He added: “If we accept that promoting science is part of the public policy of science and not only look at education and culture, we should consider why part of our scieific community that play a decisive role in many social situations but does not have an effective presence in the structure of science and promotion.”
“In rece years, the presence of women has been really good, but we do not see it in the decision -making and promotional layers and policy structure,” said the Vice Presideial Technology Adviser.
“Women are always abse in the discussion of promoting science and policy -making discussions, and if they play a role, unfortunately, the executive role is not very effective,” she said.
Poiing to women’s life experience, he said: “The experience and communication role of women has shown that women can be natural and medium actors between the structure of society and science; But this role is unfortunately ignored.
“In our society, especially in the areas of health, the environme, optimal energy consumption and so on, there are things that women can play an importa role,” she said.
According to him; The national programs we see are not statistically analyzed by the status of women and their role, or systematically evaluating the actual participation of women in scieific projects. For example, the Ministry of Science, the Foundation of Science, etc. all report separately.
Vice Presideial Technology Advisor, Presideial Technology, referring to the challenges of the institution of science, said: “The science institution with various challenges, including the level of social acceptance, public credibility and cultural resistance to some technologies; Consider promoting science and eer io a real conversation with society.
“The Society of Science Promotion can be a bridge to this conversation with differe social groups and the role of women there, and iernational experiences have shown that women working in promoting science are more influeial in differe segmes of society,” he said.
Apart from saying that we do not have a professional and clear path to the activity of science and this role is not defined in our administrative and policy structure. Women ierested or specialists in this field, either attract educational structures, do scattered or voluarily work.
“Lack of accurate data on the quality of women’s participation in promotional programs is another challenge, and without our data we cannot make optimal policy,” she said.
According to the advisor of the deputy of science; Another challenge is a policy view of the issue of social diversity in designing science promotional programs. Most of the coe produced use elite patterns.
“One suggestion is to have a national plan to discuss women in our field of science,” she said. The program can be formed through a ceer or official network in collaboration with the Association in collaboration with the Science Foundation in Science and qualified universities.
She added: “In this program, the training and empowerme of scieific female propaganda should be created, designing a tool for assessing the actual participation of women in scieific programs and creating a network of scieific and community -based national and regional scale with a specific mission.”
(Tagstotranslate) Science Promotion Association (T) Vice Preside of Science and Economics of Presideial Science (T) Scieific Research
