Back to Kissinger’s style? Rubio dualism in Trump’s foreign policy

US Preside Donald Trump’s sudden changes this week made Marco Rubio, the first person in the past five years to have two main national security positions in the US governme, according to ISNA. The peak poi for a route began by Trump’s presidency and ended with one of his most promine consultas.

The Bloomberg News website said that Marco Rubio’s climb hides a bigger question, who is Trump’s main adviser?

Rubio’s ascension as the Secretary of State and the Provisional National Security Adviser coincided with the fall of Mike Waltz, who has raised concern for Trump’s loyalist base called the Maga Moveme.

Waltz was dismissed at the White House after unieionally added a reporter to the Chat Chat Group on military operations and is due to be nominated as Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations.

Apparely, these developmes show the skill of the former Florida Senator – Rubio – in the doubts about his late loyalty to the world of Trump and his emergence as a passionate messenger of the US preside. However, who has become a beloved Trump or fell out of his eyes, hides a reality; Neither Rubio nor Waltz have led the importa foreign policy issues to Trump, and their influence has never been tried.

While Rubio is the highest -ranking US diplomat, he plays a major role in ending the Ukrainian war and confroing Iran’s nuclear program, and Steve Witekaf, a longtime friend and real estate activist, is a pioneer.

In Africa, Trump has appoied his daughter’s father Tiffany’s father, Masad Bulus, to oversee talks on the Democratic Republic of Congo and other issues. Rubio’s rival Richard Grennel for the Secretary of State and the Special Envoy has been negotiating with Venezuelan Preside Nicolas Maduro and sometimes disputed with Rubio.

These are separate from other people who have influenced Trump; Including Ilan Musk, which dissolved the US Iernational Developme Agency and other governme agencies, Trump’s son Donald Jr., Tucker Carlson, and the right -wing extremist Laura Lumer, who described himself as a previous clearing in the US National Security Council.

“The presence of Rubio has now expanded, but what the opportunity is making is still unclear,” said Justin Logan, director of defense and foreign policy studies at the Kato Institute, who has the most libertarian tendency.

“The National Security Adviser usually plays an importa role because of his proximity to the preside, but the White House may be less importa because power in this governme is strongly concerated,” he said.

Rubio’s actions in the coming weeks will clarify how much his extensive set of powers will add to his influence. But this will not be easy, as the White House has not yet appoied or nominated many senior positions at the State Departme and the US National Security Council. Rubio may not maiain these two sides for a long time. The last person to have both posts was Henry Kissinger in the 1980s.

The White House is investigating options to permanely replace Waltz. Candidates include Grennel, Steven Miller, Vice Preside of the White House Bureau, and active English-American-American media ierpreter Sebastian Gurka.

A US State Departme official, who asked not to be named, said on Saturday, “The preside has brought together a global team that is coordinating his policies.”

He claimed: “There is no selfishness and everyone is in the same path.”

The Bloomberg news website writes that although Waltz’s departure gives Rubio more power, he leaves him alone in some issues without alignme in Washington. He and Waltz were aligned with many of their public positions; In accordance with the traditional conservative tendency that was in line with the decades of Republican policymaking. This view is not in line with the supporters of the Maga Moveme, such as US Vice Preside JD Venus, Carlson and other members of the Trump administration.

On issues like Iran, Logan said, “Will Rubio try to affect such a decision -making process?”

“I think he does, but if he sees the preside confros, will he retreat or go?” This is a question for Marco Rubio. “

Rubio’s climb is one of the amazing changes to Trump’s second era, as he has abandoned many of his earlier views – about Vladimir Putin, NATO and US value – to make a faster tone in accordance with Trump’s demands.

He denied concerns about the dissolution of USA and silenced reporters who criticized the cancellation of dozens of iernational studes in the United States. Also, he was a staunch defender of Trump’s action to dismiss Kilmar Armando Abrigo Garcia; A citizen from Maryland, who was mistakenly deported to a prisoner in El Salvador.

A few hours after Rubio’s appoime as a temporary US national security adviser, he appeared in an ierview with Sean Haniti in Fox News and responded to JD Venus’s joke about the speed of his ratio soon. He also praised and admired Trump’s first 7 days of foreign policy.

“The question is, the only leader in the world who can talk to both parties and hope to reach an agreeme,” he said of the Russian -Ukraine war. And that person is Trump’s preside. “

The statemes were remarkable only for his speaker at the curre White House, Bloomberg writes.

Rubio, who was a rival to Trump in the Republican in -house competitions, he strongly criticized former Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson and Trump’s first option for the State Departme for refusing Putin as “war criminal”.

He is also a previous one before, and many of the programs that are now being dissolved at the US State Departme have praised.

“He was once opposed to the authoritarian governmes and critics of Vladimir Putin,” said Corey Shake, a senior member of the American Institute of Ierpur. And none of these positions are neither the choices of the curre governme nor the views that the Secretary of State still adheres to. “

The end of the message