Medvedev: It is time to have a replacement for the Hague Tribunal

According to RCO News Agency, Dimitri Medvedev, the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, who was formerly president, said in a statement: “It seems completely possible to develop a concept at the regional level (for example, within the Brix framework).

Medvedev wrote in an article entitled “Illusing, or how the International Criminal Court became no one,” in Pravnandiyah, “This new judicial body in Brix can make its members’ joint commitment to the principles of the UN Charter, including the immunity of foreign independent states from any foreign jurisdiction.

According to Medvedev, the International Criminal Court must be “forgotten in its current” inefficient “state.”

“If the Hague Tribunal is currently uncomplicated, interested countries will find the opportunity to establish another international criminal court to protect them,” the prominent Russian politician wrote. Its statute must be based on all the world -renowned rules of international law, including the principle of complete immunity of senior officials. Its competence can include genocide crimes, war crimes, crime against humanity, and terrorist attacks. Such attacks are often designed and implemented in the territory of two or more countries. “International cooperation within the framework of this new institution will be able to prevent these attacks.”

Medvedev added that the International Criminal Court has also shown “discriminatory blindness and deafness” against some prominent war criminals, while paying much attention to less important cases.

“Some of the people in the courts were actually condemned and imprisoned, mainly direct criminals in several limited countries that were testified against them,” the official added. However, a number of high -ranking war criminals remained without punishment … The question is here; Are these “warlords”, tribal leaders involved in Africa and other criminals really “international criminals” that national judicial systems cannot confront? “Was it really necessary to establish a huge and expensive institution like the International Criminal Court to control and account for them?”

The Deputy Security Council of the Russian Security Council also accused the International Criminal Court of favoring and acting in favor of the West; Because it has refused to prosecute NATO member states. According to him, all of these measures have led many countries to withdraw from the Rome Statute, which is the ICS Foundation.

“As a result, the judicial procedure of the International Criminal Court sparked legal questions, not just by jurists,” the Russian official said. Over time, the court has become more and more dependent on political and ideological factors, factors that should actually be eliminated from its work process. A clear tendency for condemnation or exemption is merely based on the interests of what is called “collective West”, relying on their dual standards of interest. However, it seems strange, this trend led to a kind of flattery to some countries (primarily US); “Countries that had a humiliating deal with ICC and its performance.”

In recent years, the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest for several world leaders, including Russian President Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, the Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. These decisions have been criticized. Some countries, such as Hungary, decided to leave ICC, while US President Donald Trump signed a boycott against the court for his actions against Washington and its allies, including the Zionist regime.

The decree said that the United States will take significant steps against those who are “responsible for violations of the International Criminal Court”. Some of these measures include blocking property and assets as well as suspending the entry of ICS staff and their family members into the US.

The end of the message